Doesn’t matter PS5 will never compete with a 3090 never in any scenario ever
Ok Pipe down PC elitists. Nobody with any common sense would suggest the PS5 has the raw horsepower and capability of an RTX 3090. That's obvious. BUT what you can say is that the overall experience of playing
this game on a PS5 compared to a 3090 is on par. Why? Well fundamentally, because as is the case 99% of the time the 3090 and its additional horsepower is largely underutilized in this title. This engine is designed to run well at 60fps on an Xbox One. So there is only so much further you can go (i.e. only so much scalability). The reality is that 90%+ people are still gaming on 60hz displays (TVs or Monitors) anyway. So ability to lock to stable 60hz (minimum) is more meaningful than running with an
average of 120fps that will largely go unnoticed by most.
NXGamer's point is that if this were a blind test with no prior knowledge of the resolution and frame rate, most people could not perceive the
differences (i.e. advantages) of the 3090) while actually playing the game (which is true in like 95% of all of these comparisons anyway). What we have is a case where PS5 is running essentially with a min FPS of 60 (even in high action and cinematics) while the 3090 actually drops below 60fps at times at native 4K ultra. So which one is more desirable? PS5 delivers IQ indistinguishable from native 4K with graphical settings that are close enough to ultra that many won't be able to tell the difference, and a more consistent frame rate
in this game. So the overall experience would be pretty close. Considering that 3090/5950 PC is probably at least 5x more expensive than the console, I'd say it's a pretty compelling story.