I disagree on the story, GTA IV's story was highly overrated IMO, maybe if the voice actor didn't sound like Shrek with an accent it would have come across better. I loved the two DLC expansions though, they were both very well done. I would have loved to have seen that whole collection remade though, built it up to current graphical standards and leave the physics how they were, and then make GTAV higher res, add HDR and 60fps and push out some LOD and it'd be fine.They should have remastered GTA IV instead. That was the last good GTA with a well-written story, fun physics and gameplay set in Liberty City.
That comparison was silly there were no Pro or One X upgrades for GTAVNeed to see this against vanilla PC version. Maybe my memory is just fooling me. It would be funny, if it's just a straight PC port.
For comparison, when they actually had meaningful upgrades that people would buy a new version for:
I'll be honest, not the biggest fan of tw3 but if I have to choose, 100% that instead of a 9 years old game who plays on fucking microwaves too, and kids infestedI now predict the same for Witcher 3.
There is no substantial update. If there's one they would have showed it.
That's why they showed the nearly seamless character Change Speed. What a joke.
Advertising how fast now you can change
between the characters. Pathetic.
People which support these *%#^+£$ are responsible for this shit. This Game still sells like hell and people are spending millions in GTA $Rockstar are dead.
This is what Zelnick said at a recent conference.......Remastering has always been a part of the strategy. We've done differently than the competition - we don't just port titles over, we actually take the time to do the very best job we can making the title different for the new release, for the new technology that we're launching it on. We improve the technology, we upgrade the visuals, and we make performance enhancements. And that's why I think our remastered titles typically do so well.
Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the main writers of the series leave the company? Also, when they are making recurring revenue from GTA Online, why would they waste time with DLC for a 3 year old game?It's good to see there is serious pushback on this. If there were at least some SP DLC then maybe I could see it but it's just a slightly more polished version of the PS4 game. I don't get why Rockstar is so against SP DLC. Almost every stream I saw of RDR2 wanted Sadie or Charles DLC. Why doesn't Rockstar see this?
They should have released it in 2019 and even now it would still get a lot of applause. I bet a trailer announcing a Sadie Adler DLC get way more thumbs up than down.Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the main writers of the series leave the company? Also, when they are making recurring revenue from GTA Online, why would they waste time with DLC for a 3 year old game?
I think Rockstar understands the expectations that people have for GTA 6 and that game is most likely costing tons of money and resources so they might be using this as a quick cash grab before they have to move on with the new game.
They should have released it in 2019 and even now it would still get a lot of applause. I bet a trailer announcing a Sadie Adler DLC get way more thumbs up than down.
Rockstar still does very well but something they used to have until recently was respect and credibility which is fading and once they lose that the Rockstar name won't mean much anymore.