ShortDarkAndUgly
Neo Member
How different is this version of Crusader from the PSX version? I already played that version quite a bit and I'll just get Alpha Centauri instead if Crusader looks exactly the same
The pad support is a little shaky in Sands of Time but it's otherwise a great port. Very unlike the Beyond Good and Evil port.Htown said:Yeah, can't speak for the shooters, but Sands of Time is amazing. Unless there's some kind of problem with the PC port, it should be recommended.
ShortDarkAndUgly said:How different is this version of Crusader from the PSX version? I already played that version quite a bit and I'll just get Alpha Centauri instead if Crusader looks exactly the same
No, but they did have a pretty nice spring sale last year where you could get up to 50% off some of their top selling games.LovingSteam said:Does GoG usually have a summer sale like Steam?
ShortDarkAndUgly said:How different is this version of Crusader from the PSX version? I already played that version quite a bit and I'll just get Alpha Centauri instead if Crusader looks exactly the same
HK-47 said:Also Minsc, you should mention to play Ur Quan Masters in place of SCII on the master list.
Zefah said:Anyone else unable to get Alpha Centauri running on Windows 7 64-bit?
It shows the Firaxis loading screen, then crashes with a "terran.exe has stopped working" pop up. Running in compatibility mode doesn't seem to help, either.
Will you play the game right now? If no, just wait.LovingSteam said:I'm trying to decide if it'd be smart to just wait for the big sale to spend. Argh.
Minsc said:Lack of bundled expansions is a growing trend with these EA releases, damn licensing issues. I think SMAX added quite a bit to SMAC too, shame, but it won't stop me either. Hopefully they bundle it in down the road.
There was no sale like that last year. Last year's "GOG.com Holiday Celebrations" promo was 50% off around 300 titles.DMczaf said:I love the Buy 1 Get 1 sale during the holidays, thats where I usually do a lot of my GOG damage.
Why would there be a legal issue for Diable Hellfire? I mean, Sierra made it, and Sierra was owned by the same company as Blizzard was at the time. Since then both were sold multiple tiles, until they ended up as part of Activision and Sierra was shut down. Where do the legal issues come in?Minsc said:Or is it a case of something like the Sierra produced Diablo: Hellfire, where even Blizzard is stuck in legal hell and can't get the rights to bundle it with Diablo? That's what I figured anyway, but if EA 100% owns the rights to them, at least that increases the chances of them surfacing later.
I'd rather just have seen it at the 9.99 price point with the expansions myself, I doubt they'll sell the expansion separately, have they done that for any title to date?
Minsc said:Do you want a true masterpiece of interactive novel (literally, 800,000 words - over twice as long as your typical Robert Jordan 600 page tomb), a classic FPS that plays like a space sim (joystick preferred, kb/m is serviceable i think), or a older but awesome puzzle/action game with a bit of a curve for controls?
epmode said:Each of those games is good. Torment holds up the best, especially with the resolution mod. And it helps that it's the best story-driven RPG ever. Descent is unique to this day although it's held back by the ridiculously low resolution of those old DOS games, and the joystick mapping is tough with DOSBox. Crusader is pretty awesome if you can get used to the controls.
cicero said:There was no sale like that last year. Last year's "GOG.com Holiday Celebrations" promo was 50% off around 300 titles.
Only times I can remember there being a Buy 1 Get 1 sale was during the initial early access closed Beta period in September of 2008, where for every purchase you got a free game from a select few from Interplay's catalog, and then the one year Anniversary of that when they did the same exact thing. December of 2008 they did do a buy 2 games for $9.99 and get any $5.99 game free deal though, maybe you were thinking of that?
Rainbow Six and Ghost Recon do not come with the expansion packs, and you can't install them from another source with the GoG versions. Not a huge deal for Rainbow Six, but a deal breaker for Ghost Recon, in my opinion.HK-47 said:Sands of Time is one of the greatest 3D platformers of last gen, while Ghost Reacon and Rainbow Six defined the tactical shooter genre before it was butchered.
Unless someone knows of something wrong with these versions, they are all highly recommendable.
You don't even know how much I love you for this post. God I love modders.Sinatar said:DXX-Rebirth adds high resolution support and makes joystick compatibility much easier. Works with Descent 1 and 2.
toasty_T said:I bought Arcanum not long ago, is there any way I can get it to run in windowed mode?
epmode said:Each of those games is good. Torment holds up the best, especially with the resolution mod. And it helps that it's the best story-driven RPG ever. Descent is unique to this day although it's held back by the ridiculously low resolution of those old DOS games, and the joystick mapping is tough with DOSBox. Crusader is pretty awesome if you can get used to the controls.
jaundicejuice said:I picked up Planescape because I need something to cleanse the palette after forcing myself through Red Faction 2. I take it I can just look on the Planescape GoG forum for the widescreen hack?
jaundicejuice said:Speaking of Planescape, I've run the widescreen patch but now everything except the gameplay occupies the upper left side of my screen at what is likely the applications original resolution. The movies, the title screen, the menus, everything but the gameplay, is this typical?
LovingSteam said:Does GoG usually have a summer sale like Steam?
Mimir said:Rainbow Six and Ghost Recon do not come with the expansion packs, and you can't install them from another source with the GoG versions. Not a huge deal for Rainbow Six, but a deal breaker for Ghost Recon, in my opinion.
What's wrong with the controls? I loved Crusader back in the day and would love to play it again after, well, more than 15 years -- I don't remember much about it.LocoMrPollock said:The controls are really hard to get used to, so much so that I'm probably gonna give up on it.
A Black Falcon said:Why would there be a legal issue for Diable Hellfire? I mean, Sierra made it, and Sierra was owned by the same company as Blizzard was at the time. Since then both were sold multiple tiles, until they ended up as part of Activision and Sierra was shut down. Where do the legal issues come in?
jaundicejuice said:Edit: This is why I love PC gaming. I'm sitting here running fan made patches to add in modern screen resolution support, patches so the user interface functions properly with that increased resolution, patches for bug fixes and tweaks for a game that came out over a decade ago.
Sloane said:What's wrong with the controls? I loved Crusader back in the day and would love to play it again after, well, more than 15 years -- I don't remember much about it.
Minsc said:Maybe they don't then. There was a time when Blizzard was selling Diablo without Hellfire, which sucked, and I found really weird. Couldn't imagine any other reason why they didn't include it, as the new classes and dungeons were neat. Now they just don't sell Diablo 1 at all anymore, shame, it was still a great game. Always enjoyed the randomness to the quest structure.
Minsc said:You should really follow this guide to a T before you get too far (as you have to start over when you change mods, and there's some amazing ones).
Stumpokapow said:I don't really care much about Diablo 1 personally, but I've also noticed that Blizzard doesn't sell WC1 or WC2 anymore. They start at WC3. Which is very unfortunate, because WC2 has absolutely seminal single player games and was really well designed. It's also an awesome relic of the time before StarCraft where it was acceptable to make an RTS game with symmetrical player nations/races rather than asymmetrical but balanced ones. Very different time.
jaundicejuice said:Err, I should probably stop playing, I've almost hacked my way out of the mortuary, and redo the tweak patch. I didn't add these tweaks...
You SHOULD install:
- Save Nordom! Tweak
You SHOULD install:
- Maximized HP Per Level for TNO and Party
- Maximized Friends Spell
- These are very minor changes.
Stumpokapow said:I don't really care much about Diablo 1 personally, but I've also noticed that Blizzard doesn't sell WC1 or WC2 anymore. They start at WC3. Which is very unfortunate, because WC2 has absolutely seminal single player games and was really well designed. It's also an awesome relic of the time before StarCraft where it was acceptable to make an RTS game with symmetrical player nations/races rather than asymmetrical but balanced ones. Very different time.
coopolon said:Huh, I thought it wasn't until SC that they started making each side distinct yet balanced. Then again I was very young when I played WC2.
mclem said:Command & Conquer had a reasonable level of differentiation, though. They don't fundamentally play differently, unlike Starcraft, but there was a good number of different units between the sides.
Minsc said:GDI vs NOD units (wow, I thought there were more, there's only like 6-7). There were similarities, but also some decent differences. NOD had faster units, GDI had better air and the Mammoth tank.
Edit: It's missing some, the basic ones, machine gun, engineers, and the sonya/commando unit. Guess it's not a complete list, but it's a nice visual reference.
Minsc said:Warcraft 2 also had the boats, which I think the third didn't?
Stumpokapow said:Yes, that's what I mean.
Prior to StarCraft, if you had two sides, they were the same*. That was balance. StarCraft changed it up in that regard. So WC2 is neat because it pre-dates that change which became almost universal after that point.
*90%+ the same.
mclem said:Edit: On that note, could C&C be part of the EA deal? I'd not really considered it, but it strikes me as a natural fit.
coopolon said:You think that's a good thing? Especially in SP? SC blew me away because all of a sudden the sides weren't just color/texture swaps.
coopolon said:That'd be awesome just to get them working flawlessly on vista/7. They've actually given away C&C and RA for free for awhile now, but they are huge pains in the asses to get running. I tried installing my old copy of RA awhile ago, I could never get it uninstalled. Didn't get rid of it until I reformatted.
Minsc said:All the copies from the Command & Conquer - The First Decade run perfectly under Windows 7 64-bit (includes C&C / Covert Ops, C&C Tiberium Sun / Firestorm, C&C Generals / Zero Hour, Red Alert / Counterstrike / The Aftermath, Red Alert 2 (omg epic intro) / Yuri's Revenge, and the oddball C&C Renegade. Was a steal and a half when I picked it up for $30 years back, even if it does eventually come out cheaper. What's nice is there's no cds for the box set, so you get an all-in-one (pack) fix.
Yeah, Blizz REALLY should still be selling Warcraft II: Battle.net Edition. They still run the BNet service for the game last I checked, why not make the game available? It uses a CD-key, so that's not an issue. And as you say it's a great classic, still one of the best RTSes ever made. People should still be able to get it.Stumpokapow said:I don't really care much about Diablo 1 personally, but I've also noticed that Blizzard doesn't sell WC1 or WC2 anymore. They start at WC3. Which is very unfortunate, because WC2 has absolutely seminal single player games and was really well designed. It's also an awesome relic of the time before StarCraft where it was acceptable to make an RTS game with symmetrical player nations/races rather than asymmetrical but balanced ones. Very different time.
I looked at the jewelcase and Hellfire was developed by Syngergistic Software and published by Sierra. I'd imagine that Sierra and Blizzard would have the rights, though, not the developer, so I don't see where a legal issue would come from... though such things do happen, look at how the Syndicate and System Shock games have legal issues keeping them off GOG even though you'd think EA wouldn't have any such problems.Minsc said:Maybe they don't then. There was a time when Blizzard was selling Diablo without Hellfire, which sucked, and I found really weird. Couldn't imagine any other reason why they didn't include it, as the new classes and dungeons were neat. Now they just don't sell Diablo 1 at all anymore, shame, it was still a great game. Always enjoyed the randomness to the quest structure.
It's so insane that they managed to fit all of those games onto one DVD... how did they do it, compression?Minsc said:All the copies from the Command & Conquer - The First Decade run perfectly under Windows 7 64-bit (includes C&C / Covert Ops, C&C Tiberium Sun / Firestorm, C&C Generals / Zero Hour, Red Alert / Counterstrike / The Aftermath, Red Alert 2 (omg epic intro) / Yuri's Revenge, and the oddball C&C Renegade. Was a steal and a half when I picked it up for $30 years back, even if it does eventually come out cheaper. What's nice is there's no cds for the box set, so you get an all-in-one (pack) fix.
coopolon said:Y
That'd be awesome just to get them working flawlessly on vista/7. They've actually given away C&C and RA for free for awhile now, but they are huge pains in the asses to get running. I tried installing my old copy of RA awhile ago, I could never get it uninstalled. Didn't get rid of it until I reformatted.