Chuck Berry
Banned
Didn't even recognize him. Are those contacts he's wearing? Is that his real hair?
well, he is a Facedancer, aka a shapeshifter, so wouldn't surprise me if that look is supposed to be a little artificial.Didn't even recognize him. Are those contacts he's wearing? Is that his real hair?![]()
One big problem of a lot of 'modern' adaptations is they feel this irresistible urge to inflate the agency of every female character. So they no longer serve the story or function to drive the main characters journey, instead they become distractions or hurdles for the flow of the story. The princess isn't there to be rescued, she MUST rescue herself kinda stuff. And since modern theory tells us EVERYONE was misogynist back in the day, then by default every female character was written to be subject to some man. So even if the female character is written in a perfectly normal way, they just gotta invert all her motivations to say "see how independent she is!" or to create new drama to fill screentime because they have some obligation to give the side characters equal time.As far as Hollywood goes, this is a pretty good adaptation.
But it's very much an adaptation. The first film is great and pretty close to the first book. The second is still good, but tries to do too much of its own thing.
Not that the books are that great to read. Herbert was shit at writing dialogue. My last reread was painful and I gave up.
It's the world building that Herbert was great at, and weaving the stories in. This film trilogy does a similarly fantastic job at world building but the story has lost its course.
One big problem of a lot of 'modern' adaptations is they feel this irresistible urge to inflate the agency of every female character. So they no longer serve the story or function to drive the main characters journey, instead they become distractions or hurdles for the flow of the story. The princess isn't there to be rescued, she MUST rescue herself kinda stuff. And since modern theory tells us EVERYONE was misogynist back in the day, then by default every female character was written to be subject to some man. So even if the female character is written in a perfectly normal way, they just gotta invert all her motivations to say "see how independent she is!" or to create new drama to fill screentime because they have some obligation to give the side characters equal time.
It felt like I was watching the trailer for Marriage Story: Space Edition, rather than an epic scifi movie.Honestly, the revisionism for this bothers me more than Nolan's Odyssey.
As expected after Part 2's nonsense, now the central conflict is Paul vs…Chani?
And it's just so weak to explicitly remove the Jihad and Messiah themes so as not to upset people.
Bad fanfiction.
Still looks cool otherwise and I'll see it, but be sure to read the books.
Maybe this conflict written for Part Three is the reason why Chani was so much propped up in Paul's prescience visions in the first movie.As expected after Part 2's nonsense, now the central conflict is Paul vs…Chani?
It's because womenBut for some reason we allow the conversation to only flow one way.
Now this will blow your mind:Didn't even recognize him. Are those contacts he's wearing? Is that his real hair?![]()