-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
GHG
Member
Wait... This was done by saber...?
The same saber that is doing the Witcher 3's next gen upgrade...:
Saber Interactive to manage Witcher 3 next-gen port, freeing up CDPR to handle CP2077 in house
Source: https://www.tweaktown.com/news/74981/saber-interactive-is-developing-witcher-3s-ps5-xbox-series-port/index.html Saber Interactive, part of the Embracer Group has been tasked with porting The Witcher 3 to next gen consoles. They did the Witcher 3 backport to Nintendo Switch hardware...
Fake
Member
Wait... This was done by saber...?
The same saber that is doing the Witcher 3's next gen upgrade...:
Saber Interactive to manage Witcher 3 next-gen port, freeing up CDPR to handle CP2077 in house
Source: https://www.tweaktown.com/news/74981/saber-interactive-is-developing-witcher-3s-ps5-xbox-series-port/index.html Saber Interactive, part of the Embracer Group has been tasked with porting The Witcher 3 to next gen consoles. They did the Witcher 3 backport to Nintendo Switch hardware...www.neogaf.com
Yeap. Saber plus Crytek.
Even at High settings (albeit with Ray Tracing set to ‘But Can It Run Crysis‘) this game, at 4K, looks better than a lot of contemporary games.
No way on earth does the original game look better. That’s just crazy talk.
Fake
Member
Matter of taste. PC original indeed looks better to the PC remaster.
Dunno why they change the color palete, but looks a very bright game now. In fact looks more Far Cry 3 than Crysis to me.
And don't matter the resolution here. We're talking about comparisons to be made with the original. I already check out some comparions and even the remaster lack some tree vs original, tree animations run at 30 fps and HDR is broken.
BTW, saying 'looks better than a lot of contemporary games' is a very low argument with can be used pretty much in any game release.
Last edited:
Yeesh. Tell us where on the benchmark graph the mean old YouTubers touched you?
Wait?!?!.... so you’ve brought your pitchfork out against two Internet personalities because their fans — again, their fans — made stupid claims (like fans often do).
BaneIsPain
Member
The remastered is literally and figuratively in..... Crysis.
smallpotatosan
Member
Oh my. Glad to see drs in action.
captainraincoat
Banned
Ai is just as shit on pc...I rolled into a camp and I found 2 soldiers running in a corner
there was no gay stuff going on so I put it down to a glitch
I later found a soldier tbagging a chicken
Fake
Member
There are some sound bugs thats can only be found on the PS360 version (no sight on PC version), but somehow is present on this remaster...
Last edited:
pawel86ck
Banned
Crysis Remastered is not based on the original PC 2007 version, has worse PC controls
Before benchmarking the game, we've decided to re-install the original Crysis game and compare these two versions.
www.dsogaming.com
thelastword
Banned
22 fps on a Titan RTX and 31 fps on a 3080........Someone was just telling me that these cards are overkill for everything...
Dampf
Member
Post like these make we want to leave this board. How can you be so disrespectful? Grow up, kid.
Last edited:
GHG
Member
Crysis Remastered is not based on the original PC 2007 version, has worse PC controls
Before benchmarking the game, we've decided to re-install the original Crysis game and compare these two versions.
Fucking knew it.
It's a console port of a console port.
The original Crysis with mods is still the definitive way to play this game.
Hope that Epic money was sweet.
RedVIper
Banned
Maybe a poorly optimized game isn't the best benchmark to use.
There's way better looking games that run way better than this.
Fake
Member
Crysis Remastered is not based on the original PC 2007 version, has worse PC controls
Before benchmarking the game, we've decided to re-install the original Crysis game and compare these two versions.
Sigh. Pathetic the Crysis fanboys defend this piece of junk.
Bruh 'can you run Crysis', my ass. They're using this joke as an excuse.
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Well good thing i am moving from Titan RTX to 3090 : D
Hostile_18
Banned
I've just picked this up on the PS4 Pro. While I hope it gets fixed, I can live with some jank.
Beer Baelly
Al Pachinko, Konami President
thelastword
Banned
Going by these framerates, you might two of those in SLI.......
ethomaz
Banned
Não don’t know what to say... while some modern effects takes places and texture are a bit better the Remaster is less detailed, has no shadows in a lot of places, the water is bad, and the color pallete is out of pace.
There is a lot of comparisons on YouTube already.
Last edited:
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
I am not going to game on it, so I was just messing up. Just machine learning and crypto mining : )
thelastword
Banned
Maybe so, but according to Alex do you see these godrays? Who cares about framerate if we have pure voxel GI, raytraced shadows, proper water caustics and tesselation......
Tbh, the graphical features Crytek put there are pretty demanding if you go the bruteforce route........My issue here are the bugs lighting breaking up behind certain rocks or tall grass and many inconsistencies.......I'm not even sure Crytek would have bothered if people did not make noise after the first gameplay showing which looked really bad......I expect much better from them...I know they are not the same as they used to, but surely hitting a remake out the pack for a Crysis remaster or trilogy would have put Crytek in good stead for a Crysis 4 or better adoption of Hunt and it's other games......Tbh, I would love a new Ryse and I love the Crysis games, but they should have done better.....They knew day 1 that people want the games to be playable on their rigs....That "can it run Crysis meme and e-peen pull" does nothing for Crytek, just for extreme gloating fans like that famous Crysis and Star Citizen Shrine guy, who worships tech moreover a game's playability.....13 years is too long for "can it run crysis BS".....I bought a 6800 ultra new for $700 USD, just to play it back then, you mean games still have to struggle to play this after all those years at our preferred resolution, I call bollocks....
xpresstuning
Member
It's a shitty remaster that doesn't function well on any platform and while looking better in some cases thanks to modern graphical features (the Remaster can indeed look great), it also looks worse such as in the examples given in the article above. One step forward, two steps back.
Also it's not based on the original PC version, but on the PS3/360 port which was a heavily gutted, modified version to begin with. That explains why environmental effects were gutted as well in the "Remaster", compared to the original.
It doesn't include the Crysis: Warhead expansion, which is a great, meaty piece of content.
The controls are worse, less complex and less responsive than in the original.
This "Remaster" is painfully devoid of the slightest reason to exist in its current iteration. It is lazy, buggy and poorly optimized.
If you want an example on how to do a remaster for the consumers, then look at Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition or Command & Conquer: Remastered Collection.
Also it's not based on the original PC version, but on the PS3/360 port which was a heavily gutted, modified version to begin with. That explains why environmental effects were gutted as well in the "Remaster", compared to the original.
It doesn't include the Crysis: Warhead expansion, which is a great, meaty piece of content.
The controls are worse, less complex and less responsive than in the original.
This "Remaster" is painfully devoid of the slightest reason to exist in its current iteration. It is lazy, buggy and poorly optimized.
If you want an example on how to do a remaster for the consumers, then look at Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition or Command & Conquer: Remastered Collection.
Last edited:
SkylineRKR
Member
Game is shit on Pro. Stay away.
Its based on the console version with the nerfed suit controls. Quality mode looks awful. Performance mode has higher framerate and seems to be the best choice. RT mode looks more vibrant I guess.
Gameplay is bad. AI is bad. Missing a lot of shots for whatever reason. Shotgun feels good. My first experience with Crysis was the OG PC version and thats still far more fun to play than this shit.
Its based on the console version with the nerfed suit controls. Quality mode looks awful. Performance mode has higher framerate and seems to be the best choice. RT mode looks more vibrant I guess.
Gameplay is bad. AI is bad. Missing a lot of shots for whatever reason. Shotgun feels good. My first experience with Crysis was the OG PC version and thats still far more fun to play than this shit.
LaughingStock
Member
This is ridiculous. I just requested a refund.
OneBigPuss
Member
WHAT?Really?Wow....
I’m not sure what you’re trying to show here? In this video virtually every comparison has the re-mastered version looking superior.
The person who wrote the captions is an idiot.
diffusionx
Gold Member
I actually like the look of the original game a lot more. It looks distinct, unique, and realistic, the new one just overloads all the effects we have seen this entire generation.
I went back and looked at some pictures I took when I was in Costa Rica, Mexico, Miami, etc. The original Crysis actually does look more like those photos than this new one. The leafy jungle type areas seem spot on as opposed to the overblown bloomy look of the new one. Pretty surprising. Bad job all around from Crytek.
Last edited:
thief183
Member
The "can It run crysis" is an overkill setting supposed to be out of reach for some generation. The attitude of some ppl in the forum is the reason why many devs avoid this type of settings.
Omg! a 3080 can't run it at 4k! Omg omg omg!!
They could have locked the setting out and noone would have said anything.
Some ppl really can't enjoy the small things.
Omg! a 3080 can't run it at 4k! Omg omg omg!!
They could have locked the setting out and noone would have said anything.
Some ppl really can't enjoy the small things.
thief183
Member
I can assure you that It may depend by the hdr that is a mess... The game is outsatnding from a technical point of view....
You’re not making sense here?
On the one hand you’re saying you don’t like the aesthetic of the re-master, that you prefer the look of the original, which is a perfectly valid opinion.
But then, suddenly, at the end you take a swipe at Crytek and say ‘bad job all around’.
Sorry? - what are you talking about... they did a bad job because they re-mastered the game? They did a bad job because of the performance? I don’t see how your conclusion is supported here?
No it does not. This is just, objectively not true.
That's a good question. Why not release on next gen only. These games would have gotten a lot more attention otherwise
Last edited:
Amaranty
Member
No one can now say that it only runs 30 fps on consoles.
Hostile_18
Banned
The enemies have the best eye sight and reaction time ever. I feel like they would have no problem pre ordering a 3080.
Fake
Member
There is no true or lie in that statment my random internet friend. As I said, a matter of taste.
Last edited: