The Fartist
Gold Member
Don't care as long as there's an easy mode and it holds my hand from start to finish. Day one if they include kittens.
I haven’t noticed any dip in quality for any of Miyazaki’s other works; DS, DS 3 and Sekiro. They’re all comparable to DeS and Bloodborne.This is actually not true, multi-platforming means less optimization on every platform, so technically a game is worse off with more platforms.
You can see this demonstrated easily by just how bad quick-buck Console to PC ports are. Less effort in = technical mess.
You're saying all exclusives are bad and are not important to consoles? Interesting.everyone who voted yes, please never call yourself a gamer ever again, and from now on refer to yourself as a cringe fanboy, thank you very much,
this has been a public service announcement
You're saying all exclusives are bad and are not important to consoles? Interesting.
?
The point is that none of that is what the poster said. You've extrapolated all this.?
Bloodborne is a Sony owned IP. Just like Nintendo's IPs. Just like Microsofts IPs. Should we expect them to suddenly be multiplatform and come to all other consoles? People who voted "yes" aren't gamers because they don't agree?
Exclusives are important to the consoles, I don't think they'd sell as many consoles if they lacked them.
There's nothing wrong with having exclusives. Some can be bad, like intentionally paying to keep it off other platforms especially when previous versions were multiplatform, but that's not the case with Bloodborne.
Guys just exposed themselves to being Sony shills lmao
"If BloodBorne sequel was announced, but was multiplat, would you care and why?"The point is that none of that is what the poster said. You've extrapolated all this.
Sony owns Bloodborne, Demon's Souls and Horizon Zero Dawn. It's like Pokémon with Nintendo for the first two (I think Pokémon isn't made by Nintendo, but a 3rd party?). Edit: I am not sure if this Pokémon info is correct, they co-own the IP with Game Freak?How does bloodborne and demon souls come to be exclusive? Do Sony but the rights in early development or something?
Horizon Zero Dawn came to PC years after release not when it was initially released. They may have sold just as many copies now as if they released it at launch on PC. So why release it on PC at launch? What is their advantage?How does bloodborne and demon souls come to be exclusive? Do Sony but the rights in early development or something?
Bloodborne should have been available on pc as well at least as I just don't believe the game would have affected playstation sales if it became available on pc a short while afterwards.
Think horizon zero dawn.
Sony owns Demon's Souls and Bloodborne.How does bloodborne and demon souls come to be exclusive? Do Sony but the rights in early development or something?
Bloodborne should have been available on pc as well at least as I just don't believe the game would have affected playstation sales if it became available on pc a short while afterwards.
Think horizon zero dawn.
I thought I had damaged my monitor somehow, but thankfully it was just the side of that poll image.At first i thought:
"No way anyone would say yes, it'd be like admiting to be some gatekeeping fanboy, whats even the point of this thread?"
Reality:
Please tell me you're all just answering ironically
Sony owns Demon's Souls and Bloodborne.
i noticed it too, but i thought it'd be eviler like thatI thought I had damaged my monitor somehow, but thankfully it was just the side of that poll image.
One of Sony's teams and From Software made DS and BB.So did Sony ask from software to make it for them as gave them the idea or something like give them money to make a game as long as they own the rights?
I'm honestly completely unsure as to how the situation is?
One of Sony's teams and From Software made DS and BB.
From wasn't owned by Kadokawa until around 2014.Is there anyway to find more information on how these two came to be as I am really interested in exactly how.
Seems like an impending purchase from Sony to be a first party studio if they're such close working organisations.
Where is the Bloodborne pro patch? We've seen older games with less users get pro patches.One of Sony's teams and From Software made DS and BB.
Remaster is likely coming alongside a PC port.Where is the Bloodborne pro patch? We've seen older games with less users get pro patches.
It's painful playing it at a juddering 22 to 30 fps, or juddering 28 to 30 fps on PS4 pro tbhXbox fans if you really want Bloodborne that much just buy a PlayStation. That's the only way you're getting your hands on it. "PCMR" too.
Not gonna happen. If they make a remaster it would not be free. Only thing they could do and should do for free, is unlock the framerate and let PS5 players play at 60 fps using the BC. That would automatic fix the framepacing issues that are still present on Bloodborne.Remaster is likely coming alongside a PC port.
Be nice if we got a FREE PS5 patch alongside a PC version but I don't know if Sony is doing this for the gamers.
Man, even Variable refresh rate on BC titles for ps5 would be a system seller for me, as sad as that sounds lmaoNot gonna happen. If they make a remaster it would not be free. Only thing they could do and should do for free, is unlock the framerate and let PS5 players play at 60 fps using the BC. That would automatic fix the framepacing issues that are still present on Bloodborne.
That is what I said.Not gonna happen. If they make a remaster it would not be free. Only thing they could do and should do for free, is unlock the framerate and let PS5 players play at 60 fps using the BC. That would automatic fix the framepacing issues that are still present on Bloodborne.
Well ya, ds3 runs @ 60 on ps5 so of course BB could do it.it's criminal bloodborne is not playable at 60 fps and those nasty frame pacing issues is still there, i would complain to sony to first fix it because ps5 is more that capable of running it at 60 and this comes from a pc gamer.
Well ya, ds3 runs @ 60 on ps5 so of course BB could do it.