sircaw
Banned
Their standards aren't dropping, though; did it ever occur to you that maybe the reason places like DF have scaled back on some of that needless bashing and tearing-apart of game and hardware performance (while, btw, still letting people know exactly where things are performing well and where they aren't)...is because they're at least partially aware of the incredibly toxic state of online console discussion among large swathes of fanboys/fangirls who genuinely raise hell and act like some of the worst scum on the face of the Earth?
These outlets don't want to feel like they're contributing to that terrible element of the gaming community, so maybe if more gamers were mature, acted their age, and didn't go on insane hate-filled trips like even what we're seeing directed towards DF by some folks in this very thread (at least no one is sending them death threats I guess :S), then perhaps these outlets could feel more comfortable getting a bit more nitty-gritty with the tone of their criticism.
I am always surprised, and hate to admit it, but average discussion among gamers with new console hardware is NOWHERE near the levels of maturity you can get with, say, the average fan of two different music bands, or a few different films. This is even towards stuff that's actually considered widely divisive in those mediums too, take Alien 3 for example; I've never seen disagreements between proponents for/against that film show anywhere near the vitriol I see some gamers show towards PlayStation or Xbox. There's a problem there, it's widespread enough to be something of a presence, and we should be honest with ourselves as gamers to acknowledge it exists and that maybe such is why outlets like DF don't do what you want them to do, to the level you apparently feel is required in order to bring a nuanced, factual analysis.
If anything, the fact they aren't tearing platforms apart on stuff like this means they don't inject too much of a subjective, personal preference (or bias) that could erroneously convince people to make too much of an emotional read on what they're saying versus a more preferred logically-balanced read. Let the audience decide for themselves to what degree the problems being listed are important to them and their playing experience, they don't need middle-aged men yelling and screaming at them in fits of rage to help them make rational, informed decisions.
This sounds like the kind of fanboyism these type of outlets aren't exactly interested in engaging with. Look, there's no point thinking about a parallel universe where the results were reversed: John was on the DiRT 5 video and in case people are blind, John has (seemingly) a preference for PlayStation, at least IMO. So maybe the reason he isn't gushing with throwing in all the stuff you say they're throwing in, is because he's a...professional? Why the need to bring up the things you point out, when that stuff is relatively commonly understood and known, and touching up on them the way you describe would not bring forth any new amount of information on that front? OTOH, touching a bit more on the possibilities of dev environment issues (which would match up with persistent rumors throughout the year) would at least bring a new element of discussion to the proceedings, and also be the rational thing anyone in the situation would want to do.
It might've also been gut instinct on their part, considering there are PS4/XBO racing games with better LOD levels and track density/geometry than what is seen in parts of DiRT 5 on Series X in 120 FPS mode, as an example, so they probably aren't going to assume it's a fault of hardware design limitations (and if such a thing were present on the PS5 versions, theyd do the same). Moreover, everyone who keeps trying to imply DF are in MS's pockets, they literally must not be very smart, because I don't see why any developer essentially associated with Sony would do an hour-long interview with them discussing their PS5 games...yet that's exactly what Bluepoint Digital did for Demon's Souls (an interview conducted by John no less, who as I said earlier, seems to lean PlayStation, but it's as a balancing act: John/PlayStation, Richard/Xbox, Alex/PC...but it's not like they DON'T like the other platforms. And it works as a checks-and-balances type of approach).
No, i am not excepting this, you making excuses here and diverting, deflecting, trying to come up with a whole flock of bizarre reasons to fit some sort of narrative.
We are done chatting, stop with the damage control.
this is very simple to follow.
Don't release products for review that are not ready.
Digital foundry needs to do better, if they are all offended and butt hurt over a few people on twitter giving them shit, then ban them or take a break from it for a while.
People need to start having a bit more grit and stop acting like victims all the time.
There are no excuses trying to hide,conceal or just not say something is worse because they are afraid of backlash, what kinda of bullshit is that.
They are a business, that portrays its self as impartial, then act it and stop with the kid gloves.
Last edited: