• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Dirt 5: Digital Foundry Console Comparison - PlayStation 5 vs Xbox Series X/Series S + Performance - Every Game Mode Tested

sircaw

Banned
Their standards aren't dropping, though; did it ever occur to you that maybe the reason places like DF have scaled back on some of that needless bashing and tearing-apart of game and hardware performance (while, btw, still letting people know exactly where things are performing well and where they aren't)...is because they're at least partially aware of the incredibly toxic state of online console discussion among large swathes of fanboys/fangirls who genuinely raise hell and act like some of the worst scum on the face of the Earth?

These outlets don't want to feel like they're contributing to that terrible element of the gaming community, so maybe if more gamers were mature, acted their age, and didn't go on insane hate-filled trips like even what we're seeing directed towards DF by some folks in this very thread (at least no one is sending them death threats I guess :S), then perhaps these outlets could feel more comfortable getting a bit more nitty-gritty with the tone of their criticism.

I am always surprised, and hate to admit it, but average discussion among gamers with new console hardware is NOWHERE near the levels of maturity you can get with, say, the average fan of two different music bands, or a few different films. This is even towards stuff that's actually considered widely divisive in those mediums too, take Alien 3 for example; I've never seen disagreements between proponents for/against that film show anywhere near the vitriol I see some gamers show towards PlayStation or Xbox. There's a problem there, it's widespread enough to be something of a presence, and we should be honest with ourselves as gamers to acknowledge it exists and that maybe such is why outlets like DF don't do what you want them to do, to the level you apparently feel is required in order to bring a nuanced, factual analysis.

If anything, the fact they aren't tearing platforms apart on stuff like this means they don't inject too much of a subjective, personal preference (or bias) that could erroneously convince people to make too much of an emotional read on what they're saying versus a more preferred logically-balanced read. Let the audience decide for themselves to what degree the problems being listed are important to them and their playing experience, they don't need middle-aged men yelling and screaming at them in fits of rage to help them make rational, informed decisions.



This sounds like the kind of fanboyism these type of outlets aren't exactly interested in engaging with. Look, there's no point thinking about a parallel universe where the results were reversed: John was on the DiRT 5 video and in case people are blind, John has (seemingly) a preference for PlayStation, at least IMO. So maybe the reason he isn't gushing with throwing in all the stuff you say they're throwing in, is because he's a...professional? Why the need to bring up the things you point out, when that stuff is relatively commonly understood and known, and touching up on them the way you describe would not bring forth any new amount of information on that front? OTOH, touching a bit more on the possibilities of dev environment issues (which would match up with persistent rumors throughout the year) would at least bring a new element of discussion to the proceedings, and also be the rational thing anyone in the situation would want to do.

It might've also been gut instinct on their part, considering there are PS4/XBO racing games with better LOD levels and track density/geometry than what is seen in parts of DiRT 5 on Series X in 120 FPS mode, as an example, so they probably aren't going to assume it's a fault of hardware design limitations (and if such a thing were present on the PS5 versions, theyd do the same). Moreover, everyone who keeps trying to imply DF are in MS's pockets, they literally must not be very smart, because I don't see why any developer essentially associated with Sony would do an hour-long interview with them discussing their PS5 games...yet that's exactly what Bluepoint Digital did for Demon's Souls (an interview conducted by John no less, who as I said earlier, seems to lean PlayStation, but it's as a balancing act: John/PlayStation, Richard/Xbox, Alex/PC...but it's not like they DON'T like the other platforms. And it works as a checks-and-balances type of approach).


No, i am not excepting this, you making excuses here and diverting, deflecting, trying to come up with a whole flock of bizarre reasons to fit some sort of narrative.

We are done chatting, stop with the damage control.

this is very simple to follow.

Don't release products for review that are not ready.

Digital foundry needs to do better, if they are all offended and butt hurt over a few people on twitter giving them shit, then ban them or take a break from it for a while.

People need to start having a bit more grit and stop acting like victims all the time.

There are no excuses trying to hide,conceal or just not say something is worse because they are afraid of backlash, what kinda of bullshit is that.

They are a business, that portrays its self as impartial, then act it and stop with the kid gloves.
 
Last edited:
People are talking about whether DF are biased or not. Just my two cents. Honestly, I think if you can't see that DF is obviously biased for MS, that probably says a a lot about your own biases. Or maybe your needless want to not to appear bias yourself.

During the 360/PS3 era it was all positives for 360 in comparisons. Looking at any fine detail on PS3 games to show how they were inferior. When the PS4 was on top we got excuses for the XBO, questioning if resolution was really that important. An ever slight frame or two advantage on the XBO was more important than a increase in resolution from 720p/900p to 1080p. Usually ending each comparison by saying you'll be happy on either console, when before they were saying which console they recommended to get the game on. The 2nd the XBO X came out, it was here to "save the day."

Now we jump to this gen. DF were helping spread the FUD about PS5's variable clock rate, even having a flawed comparison using RDNA1 chips. When MS showed off their poor looking flagship title, Halo Infinite, quickly they had an excuse vid out, claiming most of the problem was a lack of raytracing. When people pointed out many other things, Alex said he was just too tired to go into it all. Keep in mind, this was just after zooming in really close on PS5 footage to show the raytracing reflections were lower quality or were missing objects. And now after we've had a few next-gen comparisons where they seemed pleasantly surprised about PS5 outperforming XSX, in this video they sound more troubled by it. It's almost as if they either realize that they shouldn't be excited by a system punching above its weight or they were told it's something they shouldn't seem excited by.

Just ask yourself, where are any of the videos making excuses for the way any game performs or looks on PlayStation?
 
Last edited:
Kinda of curious why he feel the need to exposure himself to the most stupid insult but when they accuse them to be too much partial in some attitude "they are all fanboy, all the same, fuck them "

He called out a specific poster on Twitter (without saying his name) because apparently that poster has been accusing DF of being shills for an entire decade (sad life ngl). The tweet is about one poster.
 

Mr Moose

Member
Then you're a fool
a7d6ea9610e5623f3ccf7a1bd6050ea6.jpg
 
I don't understand the excuses coming from the Xbox side anymore. How could MS's tools/devkits not be ready for the launch of this generation? What else were they doing for the last 18 months except getting the series X and S ready for launch? They even had 'optimized for' marketing deals attached to some games such as AC: V.

Sony was pumping out two massive exclusives to finish the PS4 generation in June/July, and they had their new console ready to go with great games showing off its capabilities straight away.

Only one company has itself organized to deliver, that's just truth. MS is going to lose customer confidence with all this marketing BS.
 

Tripolygon

Banned
Do you have proof it's SMT enabled on all consoles, or is this an assumption?
I talked to the technical director on the other forum. Cool dude.

Also
Inside Xbox Series X Optimized: Dirt 5 | NeoGAF

I love that features like the fast SSD and the ray-tracing capabilities of the GPU are some of the more talked about but I am very impressed with the power of the new Zen 2 based processor.

The CPU is very powerful – and its simultaneous multi-threading is very impressive! We’re used to dealing with the concept of running multiple threads on PC CPU cores and sharing the resources of that processor across multiple threads but actually, the SMT in the Series X processor is far more capable than usual CPUs. We found that the Dirt 5 engine was able to easily make great use of this and sprang to life across the 16 hardware threads available to us on Series X.
 
Last edited:

assurdum

Banned
He called out a specific poster on Twitter (without saying his name) because apparently that poster has been accusing DF of being shills for an entire decade (sad life ngl). The tweet is about one poster.
Ok. But I'm not new of Dictator attitude in this stuff. He likes to moke the most stupid messages in the net. but he has the bad habit to be generalist and ignore when someone point out something of more controversial and tough to debate. Indeed I prefer a lot more John, seems more genuine to me but sometimes he appears too much oppressed and obscured to the Leadbetter narrative and it's quite evident in the last video. I'm really sad for him.
 
Last edited:

The_Mike

I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
By the way. Are DF still on Microsofts payroll, or is it only when something goes into the favor of Microsoft?

Can't keep up with it anymore.
 

ethomaz

Banned
He called out a specific poster on Twitter (without saying his name) because apparently that poster has been accusing DF of being shills for an entire decade (sad life ngl). The tweet is about one poster.
Sad.
I started show DF bias in 2013... he and Richard specifically... not a decade yet :(
 
Last edited:
People here are overlooking the fact that Sony has literally blown away MS this year in terms of exclusives for both the PS4 and PS5. They've had FF7 remake, The Last of Us 2, The Ghost of Tsushima, Spiderman: MM, Demon Souls, Astro when MS has literally given nothing for the whole year. Literally every game there was a critically praised AA/AAA title and has an 80+ on Metacritic topping out at 93 for TLOU2. On top of that, Sony was able to get the PS5 SDK and kit in the hands of devs before MS and seemingly is very easy to develop than XSX resulting in better-looking launch titles. Oh and don't forget the advancements they've made on the controller front as well! Maybe it is Sony killing it but MS needs to get their shit in order.
 

The_Mike

I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
Considering John and Rich were one stutter away from saying "sorry, forgive us please, we aren't responsible for these results", I would say DF is still very much in the "watch what you say about Xbox" camp.

I havent seen the clip, but I saw the god awful pictures where I could count all the polygons like a ps1 game.

If they were on Microsofts payroll then I doubt they would even analyse this game as Microsoft would have said skip it.

Nice try. But it's PC, XbSX, PS5, from top to bottom. :messenger_tears_of_joy:

Don't do drugs kids.
 
Last edited:

Greggy

Member
There is a lot of things to be fixed on PS5 too... so they need to make the game better.

In other words you and other Sony "enthusiasts" are in this thread declaring the XSX flawed and inferior because of a game that you know is broken across the board?
And the moment you ask for PS5 fixes is coincidentally just after the devs announce that they fixed the XSX version.
Now you're trying to be a black ops warrior. Remove the camouflage, it's fine.
 

assurdum

Banned
In other words you and other Sony "enthusiasts" are in this thread declaring the XSX flawed and inferior because of a game that you know is broken across the board?
And the moment you ask for PS5 fixes is coincidentally just after the devs announce that they fixed the XSX version.
Now you're trying to be a black ops warrior. Remove the camouflage, it's fine.
Who said Xbox is inferior? Really now? Why we need to be so extremist in every discussion?
 
Last edited:

Elog

Member
Just read my reply above to geordiemp; it's a bit ironic that literally only a few weeks ago, many people here were calling DiRT 5 visually trash from the released IGN footage (even ignoring the better DF footage), and nothing like a next-gen looking game at all. Now however, because the PS5 version looks a lot better, it is a valid item to use in hammering a half-baked narrative that it just must be design flaws in the Series X as a whole?

It's quite a jump, isn't it? Especially considering, in what I posted above, we have racing games on prior-gen systems that have higher rates of LOD model quality, texture quality and the such, on systems not only much weaker in raw TF, but in all other architectural and memory I/O aspects as well.

I hope you are right - I am far from certain myself. MS has made a few design choices with the XSX that will limit the efficiency of the platform (hardware based BC, scalable design across XSS and XSX and that the same platform also acts as the server arch design).

Your point regarding textures etc is not true however. This happens at 120 FPS@higher resolution compared to last gen - that is a huge difference and makes the comparison you are making invalid. At last gen resolutions and FPS the XSX correctly and currently dominates the last-generation platforms - as it should. The problems arise when the system is pushed and when pushed the XSX does not keep up with the PS5.
 

assurdum

Banned
Do you really believe the xbox can't render this game every bit as good as the ps5? They are practically identical.
No but will be interesting how much the performance will be impacted because obviously you can't have the same FPS with more taxing graphic setting
 
Last edited:

MetalAlien

Banned
No but would be interesting how much performance will be impacted because obviously you can't have the same with more taxing graphic setting
You are not even thinking about this right... the ps5 isn't magic and the xbox isn't crippled. This is just a development issue and when they patch it it will run just fine at the same settings as the PS5.
 

assurdum

Banned
You are not even thinking about this right... the ps5 isn't magic and the xbox isn't crippled. This is just a development issue and when they patch it it will run just fine at the same settings as the PS5.
Even Xbox is not magic. You can pretend to have higher details and the same FPS because it's a bug who causes lower setting.
 
Last edited:

Rheon

Member
Are DF taking the piss with the resolution of this video? I'm trying to watch but holding off until it's in 4K.

It's been over 24 hours now...
 

MetalAlien

Banned
Even Xbox is not magic. You can pretend to have higher details and the same FPS because for a bug uses lower setting.
I'm not going round and round over this. You guys can think what you want. If these two machines were people they would be twins. This is mircosofts crappy development tools... it will be fixed and you guys can go march with your pitch forks over something else.
 

assurdum

Banned
I'm not going round and round over this. You guys can think what you want. If these two machines were people they would be twins. This is mircosofts crappy development tools... it will be fixed and you guys can go march with your pitch forks over something else.
The hell you are talking about now. You don't even understand the simple logic around this stuff? Good Lord how much victimisation.
 
Last edited:

thelastword

Banned
thugstools vs professionaltools


1qrka2.png
Imagine if Series X had this big a lead in graphical detail, with better performance and less tearing as well...

Richard: It's pretty extraordinary really....Yes the uptick we expected was about 20%, but this is way beyond that ballpark....This is almost a generational leap for the Series X over the PS5....Microsoft has really delivered on the promise of the most powerful machine here......It's really transformational....
It only has a frame rate advantage in 120fps mode and that is mainly because the graphics are severely downgraded in that mode compared to PS5 version.
No it does not......PS5 has significantly better settings and performs better in 120Hz mode too.....DF says the game feels better with VRR on XBOX. They are actually using VRR to say "that the odd times on one track where the PS5 drops some frames at the beginning of a race, is why they need VRR so much, yet beyond the beginning of that one track it's locked at 120hz....Yet XBOX framerate dips more on all tracks and it tears more in all modes, but they use VRR to say it feels better because they don't feel the framedrops or see the tears, so PS does not have VRR to combat some odd dips and tears.....This is the most disingenuous BS I've ever heard and seen......I mean, if people can't see through this BS, they must be frankly blind....Not talking about you directy btw...

You realize, they didn't even show how XBOX performs in the 120hz mode, Dark10X simply said it performs better, so why didn't he show it with lower settings and better framerate.....No receipts, just his words, they just said it's better with VRR....People need to take notice of DF's absolute wanking now....Look around the 19:07 mark, he never showed the XBOX version performing better at 120Hz mode......Perhaps he wanted to avoid the massive gulf in detail and settings.....Also, if the PS5 was running in Series X's low mode in the 120HZ mode, it would probably do 240 frames, even with it's higher settings it looks like it can go over 120Hz most of the time as it's locked pretty much 90+% of the time...

Yet, where the bias is evident and quite glaring.....In every aspect of that video when the XBOX was deficient, it was the tools not ready, it was puzzling or not normal or propping a feature XBOX has to combat bad performance and tearing (VRR), pretty much excuses.....Richard is adamant, I'll contact the devs, they are all on twitter, they will fix it on the XBOX guys don't worry. Why don't you call this faceoff as it is now and if it's patched later you go back..........

In truth, PS5 has significantly more detail over XBOX, higher resolutions especially on race startups, in their very video they said that.....Yet in the 120hz mode pushing all this extra graphical grunt, they never said the odd times the PS5 has framedrops on race startups on very select tracks is because of the higher detail + the higher resolution, or perhaps a BUG....because just after he showed the track that drops frames at the beginning of a race, they show a next race startup with no issues, with all the cars at startup on PS5, locked 120fps....They never suggested the dev could fix the odd race startup with the other track on PS5, did they tweet the dev about that....Surely devs can only fix things on XBOX.....If the PS drops frames, it's the PS's fault, if XBOX drops frames, it's tools, the dev didn't have time to optimize on XBOX, wah wah, Phil call the dirt guys.....This is not a tech channel anymore, this is a straight MS PR house....and Dark10X is no different than Alex or Leadbetter...

Is VRR something Sony can implement via firmware? Or would the have to wait for a mid-gen refresh?

Seems like some pretty important tech...
Yes it can, it's part of the 2.1 spec. It's coming to firmware very soon. Sony is probably waiting when there's more than a few TV's that support the spec, same for TV's pushing 8K 60Hz 12bit HDR 4:4:4.....

Well, when Bayonetta was running at 30fps on the PS3, Richard never said "devs still need to get used to the Cell", let alone dismiss any glaring differences as a bug. Not to mention, how ridiculous it would have been for him to say "but the fact that the PS3 has a Blu-Ray player and the Xbox 360 doesn't". In fact, he always mentioned the PS3 "limitations" throughout that entire generation.

There are some obvious double standards at play here.
If you watch some of their recent videos, they still mock Bayonetta on PS3.....As if it was the PS3's fault that the port was done by a Z team.....Then Vanquish comes and the PS3 is just as good as the 360 version, both done by platinum this time, PS3 has less tearing too....Not a word not a word not a word...
A lot of overreacting in this thread but not surprising.
Dirt 5 isn't that demanding a game. Forza Horizon 4 looks at least as good and is stable 4k60 on XSX.
Dirt 5 looks better than Horizon, has better textures, better simulations, mud, dirt, foliage, water etc...More cars on screen....Forza has very poor background textures and lots of looping assets, especially background assets and especially poor textures in the background.....Forza's LOD is so aggressive, go drive on those yellow fields that look like a tarpaulin that turns to flowers just before you drive over them. go look at all the low rez almost untextured backgrounds, on the hills in the forests, go look at the spectators, foliage quality, the way foliage is lit, the shadows they cast, go look at side track ground textures, stone wall quality, it's very low rez and unambitious rendering, it's why Forza was so performant on XBOX ONE. In truth Forza is way below the rendering of Dirt 5...Forza Horizon is a last gen game and it shows....Aesthetically you might like it's looks, but technically it's not in the same ballpark and the compromises are quite evident...A shame too, because Vega cards was running this at 4k with ultra settings, but the Series X can't even push 4k 60fps at XBONEX high rez mode settings, which was nothing close to ultra PC, lots of settings were below ultra...Instead, the Series X can't even hit 4K 60 locked with performance settings from the XBONEX mode...That's the reality...
Because devs have had no time with either platform? They are pushing out updates and games with bugs all over the place just to meet deadlines. And a handful of games got pushed back because of the pandemic

The dev literally said they barely had any time with the platform and its not the final result. So you are comparing unfinished products, which is stupid.
So a game is on shelves in a released state, people can go buy and play. People can go buy and put up comparison videos, but you are telling me it's unfair to compare a product that's on a store shelf, disc pressed because it's unfinished? So many hoops...I wonder what your stance would be if the Series X won this faceoff and PS5 had the low settings in the 120hz mode, generally lower resolutions, and still a worse framerate with more tearing, would you be so kind?
 

Rien

Jelly Belly
You are not even thinking about this right... the ps5 isn't magic and the xbox isn't crippled. This is just a development issue and when they patch it it will run just fine at the same settings as the PS5.
shouldn’t it run better since it’s the more powerful console?
 
Last edited:

longdi

Banned
He talks about SmartShift prior to the part of the video you linked. He mischaracterized it though. He said it was related to thermals and overclocking. That isn't correct though from what Cerny said. Cerny said it was all part of the power budget transferring power between GPU and CPU. It isn't related to thermals and doesn't "overclock" anything.

I think most of us have heard and know of smartshift.

The context in David speech was not about the smartshift imo, but he kinda slipped up and acknowledged their current cross gen game have tons of cpu headroom, which allows them to allocate to the Gpu and thats how PS5 is punching above its specs.
It is pretty clear, because the question posed to David earlier was, along the line: 'specs of SX is more powerful but why is DF finding games hiccuping on it, can you clue us in etc'

David for most part, tried to play it netural and adds some positivity wrt to codemaster work culture in the face of covid. It is the overclocking part he let slipped.
 

Self

Member
So, if a couple of puny, outdated GCN-based consoles released seven years ago (or even their mid-gen refreshes released 3-4 years ago) can provide racing games with even more impressive visual details than DiRT 5 (Forza 7, Gran Turismo Sport, Driveclub etc.), what makes you think an RDNA2-based next-generation console with a lot more performance and features built into it...can't?

It depends on the game engine itself. A game hasn't necessarily to look good in order to fry a gpu. PC guys know this stuff to well. Just to be clear, I'm sure the XSX version will be cleaned up.

Their standards aren't dropping, though; did it ever occur to you that maybe the reason places like DF have scaled back on some of that needless bashing and tearing-apart of game and hardware performance (while, btw, still letting people know exactly where things are performing well and where they aren't)...is because they're at least partially aware of the incredibly toxic state of online console discussion among large swathes of fanboys/fangirls who genuinely raise hell and act like some of the worst scum on the face of the Earth?

A very good and salient point.
 
Top Bottom