You haven't corrected me on anything lol! Why do live in some alternate reality?!
If you can compare the CPU and GPU, then you can also compare the SSD and I/O, but yeah, who knows, maybe Epic decided to cap their PS5 next-gen showcase demo to match the speeds of the XBsX...
Sounds like a great way to prove your point, or lack there of, hence deflection....
Even when pci drives become more common, it is the i/o overhead that will hamper the theoretical speed. Moving and decompressing data takes work, a lot off work at next gen speeds. Pc relying on the cpu to do it must come to an end otherwise the cpu will be saturated streaming data instead of processing the game.
Apparently you do. You remind me of the Joker with the uncontrollable continuous laughter at everything and your refusal to acknowledge reality. Its right there in quote i corrected you in the other thread, you refused to acknowledge it and carried on with your argument. Likewise in this thread i did it again. Current gen games are using same techs used in those Unreal Demo and lot of games are using better techs. Tomorrow Children uses better form of global illumination than Unreal Elemental demo. Lots of games have higher detailed characters and just as impressive lighting and techs than the Infiltrator demo. Go on put your Lol reaction.
Classic
Why would the Xbox or PC need to scale down? You can't answer how big the assets, textures, demo size, etc were. So why couldn't pc and Xbox run at a higher resolution and framerate? You can't tell me why it couldn't, since you are clueless on the previously mentioned stats. Not sure why you have dodged this over and over and over again.Demo can run on all platforms because the engine is highly scalable. The question is, can this demo run on the PC/XSX at the same/worse/better fidelity than what was shown the PS5? (That's not a question you should answer, so please don't.)
Now, can describe to me why a Gen 4 PCIe NVMe M.2 drive performs no better than a SATA3 SSD drive in gaming related task on a PC. Maybe if you can answer that you can answer your own question regarding latency.
Or you can continue to dodge that. Doesn't make a difference to me
The power difference between the PS5 and XSX is not that wide, yet its able to pull off that demo in 4k/60 fps.
Because I didn't respond to you, means I was proven wrong?! Lmao what are you, 5 years old?! Maybe you don't post with much intellect, and it's a waste of time replying to. Especially as it's off topic, and adds nothing to the topic. Imagine if i get a strike or get banned from arguing with a fool?Apparently you do. You remind me of the Joker with the uncontrollable continuous laughter at everything and your refusal to acknowledge reality. Its right there in quote i corrected you in the other thread, you refused to acknowledge it and carried on with your argument. Likewise in this thread i did it again. Current gen games are using same techs used in those Unreal Demo and lot of games are using better techs. Tomorrow Children uses better form of global illumination than Unreal Elemental demo. Lots of games have higher detailed characters and just as impressive lighting and techs than the Infiltrator demo. Go on put your Lol reaction.
A lot of FUD that goes against what the Engine developer said.
That’s right. It’s tough love to make things better. But because it’s consoles bringing the innovation and pushing the envelope, aka a high tide raising all ships, some will bite their nose off to spite their face.
You must be on the spectrum... For the billionth time, post factual data. Not FUD. Unless you can specifically quote where a dev said the Xbox and pc would run at lower fidelity, you don't have a leg to stand on.A lot of FUD that goes against what the Engine developer said.
Classic butt hurt denial
It was already quoted dozen of times to you but you seems to not want to read for whatever reason.
I provide the facts, huge graphics nerd here. I have the character model for a lot of games on my laptop and i can pull them and render a texture less variation for you. I know what i'm talking about, you don't and that drags the quality of conversations in this forum down because you are wrong all the time yet other wrong people like your comment and it makes you think you are right.
I've been on this forum way longer than you (2012) and I have never been banned once and neither am i worried about being banned. That should tell you i strive to keep the quality of my post high, i try to be respectful of others and i try not to post misinformation. When I'm wrong i will admit i am wrong and move on. I like to learn so go explain to me what AA is.
I don't recall where the devs started it would run decreased quality on pc or Xbox. I've asked you to show them, yet you still haven't posted anything. Running around the question only shows you have no clue what you are talking about.
Maybe a basic YouTube analogy can help?
Well it not our issue you can’t read or see the quotes... maybe you should ask for help.
Again, you claimed that he was saying that no other device could run the demo, which is false. He even explicitly states that the tech is scalable to less capable hardware.
Yeap but in that case is not the resolution the affected but the number of triangles/detail on screen.
You're not gonna try and reverse this around on me, nope, sorry. Until you can come back from posting those aliased images, we have nothing more to talk about. Especially as you are trying to quiz me now, after you nose dived into the sand, over and over with those horrible pictures.
Killzone does not need 16x AA.
I said him and others. Without being so quick to circle jerk each other, you could easily spot all the naysayers over the past 16 pages, and numerous threads. If course since you like that agenda, you pretend to not see it.
JareBear: Remastered
am I lying here?
No. Discs are too slow. They are even slower than hard drives.
You are right... it is NAND now.
HDD are disc based.
Guess you never changed after everyone called you out in the Forza thread for not being able to prove a point. Nothing has changed with the childish antics.
That is really the issue here
Well if you are capable of common sense and logic, you'd be able to see that you are not posting what the devs have said, but an unintelligent fallacy. Everyone else has read the quotes and easily dispute what you have said, yet you keep repeating it, as if it'll come true after saying it 20x. It hasn't though. And it won't.That is really the issue here
Anybody will take you serious if you keep denying what Epic said lol
They said pc, which had supposedly lower end hardware than ps5, performed the same demo pretty good. No reduced quality or anything. As matter a fact it probably performed better than ps5. Xbox series X also has the game running on it's hardware. With no decline in quality or performance either. The devs never said anything about either hardware having any problems or decreases in anything.
For the sake of argument I'll answer your question...but you're not going to like the answer...
You are the true sisyphos simulator. Constantly changing your narrative and contradicting yourself - it's impossible to establish any kind of reasonable discourse. I will give this a rest... for nowI said him and others. Without being so quick to circle jerk each other, you could easily spot all the naysayers over the past 16 pages, and numerous threads. If course since you like that agenda, you pretend to not see it.
It's almost like this happens every time to sell people on consoles and feed them marketing so they think their plastic box has a bigger penis than their other plastic box.Look what i found
I said him and others. Without being so quick to circle jerk each other, you could easily spot all the naysayers over the past 16 pages, and numerous threads. If course since you like that agenda, you pretend to not see it.
No...I wouldn't. The kind of sporadic random reads and writes of real world usage, including asset streaming, just don't lend themselves to taking advantage of that bandwidth difference. Unless you're doing prolonged sequential reads or writes, which just don't happen in games...or any application really, the performance difference will never become apparent. There's a reason that anyone who is being honest will tell you that unless you're explicitly trying to wave your dick around you should probably go for a SATA3 SSD. I have an NVMe and I will fully admit the value proposition just isn't there.
But your close friend Tim Sweeney just contradicted you with his tweets???! Must’ve forgot to check with you first.
