Riven326
Banned
How is it a joke? This is fairly standard. I don't remember many 60hz cross-gen titles on PS4 at launch.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Assassin's Creed Valhalla will run at 4K 30FPS on Xbox Series X
- Thread starter Agnostic2020
- Start date
Not Microsoft or Sonys fault ubisoft is incompetent. First patty series x games will run at 60fps as will pretty much every other cross generation game. Hell a few are getting 120fps mode. There is no excuse they couldn't tune this game to 60fps on both the PS5 and series x.
Strider Highwind
Banned
People in the thread are talking like Assassins Creed is an MS first party title developed by one of their teams...
This is Ubi giving us the type lf stuff they been giving us for years smh
And I play their games...but cmon now.
This is Ubi giving us the type lf stuff they been giving us for years smh
And I play their games...but cmon now.
There was not a 4x cpu increase either.
Riven326
Banned
So what? It's not a CPU bound franchise for one, and two, 4k resolution puts all the burden on the GPU. In fact, most modern games can run in 4k res just fine on even a low end Intel processor. The G634 or whatever the fuck it's called.
Kuranghi
Member
Same as now but we remove all alpha transparencies from games, everyone will be bald from now on and fires & explosions are banned.
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
Need more flops.
darkangel-212559
Banned
I think we are making impossible judgements based on launch day cross gen titles, it's ridiculous to base that games performance and apply it to a consoles entire life span.
I'm sure people were saying the same thing when PS4 just launched, we'll only be having upgraded PS3 games. Then many games came out which blew that out of the water.
Look at Resi 2 remake, that runs on a base PS4 and I'm sure no one thought that would have been possible when PS4 first came out.
Naked Lunch
Member
60fps for everything from here on out or get the fuck out.
Ultra high resolution, hyper detailed textures, ray tracing, all that jazz is irrelevant. I was hoping next gen wouldnt be the same shit all over again.
Ultra high resolution, hyper detailed textures, ray tracing, all that jazz is irrelevant. I was hoping next gen wouldnt be the same shit all over again.
Solarstrike
Member
Wait what? No. How could they even.This is fucking. No man this isn't right.
VFXVeteran
Banned
I got trolled and trolled and trolled for telling these console gamers that next-gen games are going to look like current gen PC games at Ultra settings running at 4k/30FPS.
Of course they didn't agree because I supposedly had an "agenda" instead of actually understanding how graphics pipelines work. Oh well...
Weaker ps5 might run it at 20-25 fps.
diffusionx
Gold Member
You are putting words in my mouth, I didn't say that every PS5 game would be upgraded PS4, I said they're not going to sacrifice the graphical fidelity that comes with 30fps in favor of 60fps after shipping a 30fps game. They're just not going to do it. The fact is any dev who wants to ship a 60fps game can, but they put those resources towards other things.
Last edited:
Riven326
Banned
No. Cerny is a genius, remember? The SSD will add frames.
Kuranghi
Member
Come man, just stop it with the agenda, we all know you are getting paid here, don't try to deny it. Everytime you criticise consoles on this forum you get another graphics card in the post from Nvidia, we all know it. Your pets can't live in houses made of GTX 1650s forever, get a real job you hippie!
Explosive Zombie
Banned
We still haven't seen what the gameplay really looks like and it's one game. Your speculation is more likely to be on point than that of other people here but this doesn't necessarily prove you right.
captainraincoat
Banned
was going to say if a 2-3tf difference can only produce a 30fp 4k game...id hate to see what the ps5 will run at
JLB
Banned
Yeah, Im all for Sony and Microsoft to play a bit the store dictator's role here and mandate at least 60fps. At the very least give a low res, 60fps option. For me its almost a deal breaker.
diffusionx
Gold Member
DoctaThompson
Banned
This was informative af lol
DoctaThompson
Banned
Let's not jinx things now
Kagoshima_Luke
Gold Member
30 FPS "next gen" Assassin's Creed
ultrazilla
Member
DoctaThompson
Banned
Agent_4Seven
Tears of Nintendo
No, it doesn't have nowhere near enough power to run modern Ubisoft games in 4K60. Try running them in the same screen resolution on PC on a 1080Ti / RTX 2080.
Riven326
Banned
They've unfortunately been convinced that the XSX has the power of dual 2080 ti's. That's why so many of them are shocked by this news and jump straight to calling the developers lazy. Reality hasn't had a chance to set in yet.
hououinkyouma00
Member
Disappointing but not super surprising seeing as Odyssey is very hard to run at 4K/60. In order to not have a knee-jerk reaction, Xbox One X runs Odyssey at 1440/30 correct? I'm not a huge fan of the new AC games due to the bloat, but I was interested with them saying it'll be shorter in addition to a setting that I enjoy.
I've got some difficult decisions ahead of me. Build a PC, or upgrade to XBSX and upgrade my MacBook.
I've got some difficult decisions ahead of me. Build a PC, or upgrade to XBSX and upgrade my MacBook.
Bruno_Arrais85
Member
So many noobs here believing in 4k 120fps.
lachesis
Member
I think we need to be little more realistic here... IMHO, 2160p @ 30fps is actually a very realistic target, as long as it keeps it rock steady, I would be pretty satisfied.
For a lot of developers - visual fidelity is probably more important than framerates - because one directly affects sales, yet the other can't be really shown unless you play the game. A lot of them chosen the visual fidelity over frame rates. It really comes down to the choice of the developers, and if they tout locked 60fps or 120fps even and it looked like last gen game... it wont' appeal to the users well.
Of course I would love to see every game locked at 2160p @ 60fps - but all games push the hardware in different manner and all have different art style and skill level of doing so. I think 1440p @ 60fps or 2160p @ 30fps would be more common resolution. Then again, this time CPU has so much power, I could be very much wrong about it - and I am hopeful for 4k 60fps would be achievable with incredible visual effects all turned on, as developers get to know the system better and better, and find out more ways to churn out more fps without sacrificing the screen effects and polygons.
For a lot of developers - visual fidelity is probably more important than framerates - because one directly affects sales, yet the other can't be really shown unless you play the game. A lot of them chosen the visual fidelity over frame rates. It really comes down to the choice of the developers, and if they tout locked 60fps or 120fps even and it looked like last gen game... it wont' appeal to the users well.
Of course I would love to see every game locked at 2160p @ 60fps - but all games push the hardware in different manner and all have different art style and skill level of doing so. I think 1440p @ 60fps or 2160p @ 30fps would be more common resolution. Then again, this time CPU has so much power, I could be very much wrong about it - and I am hopeful for 4k 60fps would be achievable with incredible visual effects all turned on, as developers get to know the system better and better, and find out more ways to churn out more fps without sacrificing the screen effects and polygons.
DoctaThompson
Banned
Sell MacBook, upgrade pc, buy laptop.
Shmunter
Member
The whole thing doesn’t add up. Running native 4K is a waste of resources. Half that Rez upscaled at 60fps is a smarter target.
I’m confident there will be a choice between performance and fidelity at the least. We are no longer cpu bound, so there are a lot more options to hit frame rate targets.
Last edited:
BusierDonkey
Member
I argue my dick is at least 4 inches long.
longdi
Banned
Probably variable 4K, dropped graphics and lower fps.
Let say this game is done with jaguar 8 cores at base, at least Series X can push their Zen2 at higher clocks than PS5!
Smart designs all about!
Bogroll
Likes moldy games
On average Ps4 Pro 1440p, XB1X 1728p with some higher settings on X. Both dynamic rez so mostly around this according to DF.
Last edited:
WouldYouKindly
Banned
12 tf surely i thought it would be 60
Mr. PlayStation
Member
Ray tracing isn't supported for Series X version. At least it's not listed in the Xbox site for Valhalla. If the game doesn't feature a higher frame lower resolution (perhaps a 1440p60fps with graphical bells and whistles) if such an option isn't there, it's such a wasted opportunity. Higher frame rates offer more immersion in a game, if the hardware is capable of handling higher frame rates can developers provide options please!