I stumbled up to this interesting picture, 46k people have answered this question on some french youtube channel. ( no idea which channel is it or is it biased to one or another, but numbers sound realistic and comparable of stuff I have seen about sony vs ms before)
I guess that Xsex powah aint sexy enough to appeal Europeans. Saw similar share of votes at Finnish gaming magazine query too.
On US this would be closer "battle" I think. Just to show how dominant PlayStation can be on many places, and being faster wont cut it.
I saw some people comparing PS5 ssd to xbox one esram.
Like wtf, they are completely different cases. Funny how far some people are fetching to prove that anything PS5 offers is poop.
If fast SSD on PS5 would be a weird/bad thing like esram, then logically xsex ssd would be 2x worse as it is slower.
ESRAM was used because ddr3 were too slow, so kind of "fix a leak with a tape" situation.
If anybody thinks that SSD (of PS5) is some kind of bad engineering or is used to "fix" something that is too slow, they must be joking or nuts.
esram tried to fix slow ram, ssd just makes things fast and removes all/most of limits of hdd. Dunno how some can even twist their mind to compare them
I guess many people still live in psychosis and think that "if ps5 ssd is faster, that can only mean that bad bad ps5 fanboys think it is faster console than xsex, not possible! RRREEEEEEEEEEEE"
This is IGN, more american site I guess