No thanks, I think I'll stay and continue to shit on secret sauce theories.
"Secret sauce" is a straw man argument.
The sauce isn't a secret, it's there for all to see.
Are there fanboys going overboard? Yes.
Is the XSX more powerful in Compute? Yes.. Are there people such as myself making technical arguments as to why that gap is
somewhat mitigated by differences in design approach? Also, yes.
Conflating everyone to serve your narrative doesn't help anyone.
A fast SSD doesn't make up for the compute difference, but any well-reasoned posts I see around GAF, REE or B3D are saying they feel the relatively small compromise Sony made in raw power is worth it for the gains made elsewhere.
While there are of course outliers I see very few people on the Sony side of the fence saying "the SSD directly makes up for the lack of teraflops" or "the PS5 is as/more powerful than the XSX" but I see plenty of people on the MS side countering these points which are barely being made, if it all..
Regarding both of those points, what I see more often is "the SSD is more of a priority for Sony than teraflops; and for me too" or "the PS5 is less powerful than XSX but design differences mean the real world gap is smaller than the teraflop gap would suggest".
People are literally making up extremes or amplifying rare extremes to support their own extremes. While most discussion is happening in the middle and anyone trying to make a nuanced case is caught in the crossfire, mistaken as a fanboy.