• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Mass Effect: Andromeda | Review Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

marrec

Banned
The thing is Mass Effect 1 was the first of it's kind. It's pretty much one of the first game to meld rpg into a shooter and it came out great.
not to mention the graphics was ahead of it's time.

And the writing was straight up Honor Harrington awesome pulpy trash, the perfect balance of down to earthiness (lol) and epic dumb drama.

The balance was off after that though and everything went downhill.
 

lt519

Member
Oof, cancelling my pre-order, i.e. just not picking it up from Best Buy, and I even got it for $38 after taxes. Maybe they'll do a direct exchange for Horizon.
 

Wollan

Member
What is this supposed to mean to me? Wasn't Shadow of Mordor top 10 that year? Do i even need to say anything else?
2014 was a dark year... likely Alien Isolation should have won all charts due to lacking competition but it's a rather niche title i.e further down gaf's goty list.
 

RDreamer

Member
Game was great. WOuld easily be in my top 10 of that year.

It's in my top 3 or 4 of this generation.

Did it have some issues? Yes. But it also had a cast I really really loved, and gameplay that I thought was great. With the DLC that's now available it's a fucking amazing game.

MGS4 and UC4 get shit on a lot as well and yet they won GAF GOTY.
they are pretty controversial games.

GAF has a pretty vocal backlash that happens to 'popular' games.
 

TankRizzo

Banned
images

god damn lmao
 
The Order should be closer to 7, MGS V should be closer to 8.

For what reasons exactly? How does that even work? Only because you liked The Order more than most people and liked MGSV less?
Review scores in general are just stupid, rating a piece of work with numbers...based on feelings. How do you even measure your feelings? Do they not know that feelings can change over time?
When I was a kid the best game I've played was Doom 3, so that was my 10/10 at the time, Until I played F.E.A.R and Half-Life 2....my score for Doom 3 soon becomes a 7/10 (Now it's more like a 4/10 for me If I really have to rate it.)
Review scores are just dumb.
Horizon Zero Dawn got 89 on Metacrirtic while Nioh gets 88. Does that make Horizon better than Nioh, if so, in exactly what way?
 

JoeNut

Member
wow 75, i'm not shocked as it seemed like this was on the cards a little while ago, but damn, i thought maybe low 80's would sneak in.

it'll still sell good i imagine, 75 isn't bad by any means but when you think of all the great games we've had this year already this is a dissapointment.
 

Phamit

Member
Sad to see that the reception isn't as good as the previous ones. The game has some faults with the most obvious one in the animations. But the Gameplay was really fun and I also liked the story in the Origin Access Trial. Whatever happened during the the development of the game, I hope they can make another and more polished Mass Effect Game in the future.
 

obeast

Member
That's a terrible excuse. Dragon Age: Inquisition was in Frostbite also, looked great. Mass Effect is a shooter.

Also, UE3... I mean, you don't get much more "shooter-engine" than that.

While I agree that the excuse isn't great, and that DA:I has somewhat better animations than the ones I experienced in my trial of ME:A (in which a number of animations looked simply unfinished), I disagree that it "looked great." I thought that the NPCs, by and large, looked weird and a little waxy (which I eventually got used to), and that a number of long conversations were nearly ruined by the lack of effort put into the animation (I'm referring to the large numbers of conversations conducted from some random perspective at a sizable distance from the characters, with only default animations - this I did not get used to)
 

Sakura

Member
The things I'm most interested in in a Mass Effect game are the writing and roleplaying aspects, but judging from the reviews they don't sound so hot.
 

Lister

Banned
It probably means, like a lot of games shit on around here, that there's actually a pretty large fanbase that likes it, they just don't like engaging in the shit-throwing and negativity all the damned time.

Argumentum ad populum. It's almost like they don't teach logical fallacies in school anymore.
 
The engine was not very different. Bioware used it for Dragon Age Inquisition, which is even further from a shooter as Mass Effect is.
This outcome was made from incompetency, plain and simple.

And it suffers from exactly the same stiff animations. I'm literally replaying it right now to scratch my Bioware itch and wait for ME:A to drop in price a bit. The only reason DA:I (mostly) received a pass on this front is because it was a cross-gen game "held back" by last gen consoles. Everyone expected the biggest flaws to be addressed in Bioware's next game, and for whatever reason they weren't. I wouldn't be so hasty to place that blame on a lack of talent over other factors like the FPS engine's toolset.
 

killatopak

Gold Member
Haha! I feel bad for them though, being forced to work in a completely different engine that was originally designed for first person shooters. As much as I can appreciate the savings EA must make by using that one internal engine for absolutely everything, hopefully they'll finally take note of the shortcomings that will obviously produce, and realize that some game genres have different priorities that dedicated (or at least different) engines can better provide.

There's a very good chance that lead animator isn't at his desk but at his boss's desk yelling "I FUCKING TOLD YOU"

???

Horizon, Until Dawn, Death Stranding and Killzone Shadowfall uses the same engine.
 

iTehDroiD

Neo Member
Gets away with it? You mean how it's been pointed out in every review of the game?

Some games have performance issues in certain areas that encompass a few areas and a relative tiny bit of playtime. Others have a variety of technical issues that plague the entire adventure. Some games over come those issues, others don't. Understand this. Reflect on it.

I was specifically talking about IGNs review.
 

BearPawB

Banned
Dragon Age Inquisition had some amazing components.
They just tried to fill that game with too much stuff, without signalling which stuff was important and which stuff should be basically ignored. But a lot of the basic stuff in that game was REALLY GOOD.


ME: A seems to have some problems on a deeper conceptual level.
Go to a new Galaxy: Same old races
Slow space exploration
"witty dialogue"

It seems like a game that probably went back on the drawing board several times, and the completed product isn't the culmination of years of work, but the scraps of salvage they could pull out from it
 

Melchiah

Member
It's pretty easy to admit that Mass Effect looks like a huge fucking disappointment and still enjoy the hobby when Mass Effect is basically the first major bad game of 2017.

I guess it depends on how you look at it, and what you expected from the game. Based on the review snippets in the OP, it sounds like a fine game. It's not perfect, but very few games are without flaws. I'm perfectly fine, if it offers as good gameplay and multiplayer as ME3 did. I can look past the goofy animations, just like I did in ME1, which I was able to enjoy eventhough it had the worst combat in the series.



78% isn't mediocre. It's great.

So, what's 75%, where MEA currently sits at?
 
I wonder what post-launch support Bioware will provide besides the usual Multiplayer Event stuff? Will they do the bare minimum effort and simply patch the worst of the bugs? Will they fix the eye shaders on human characters? Will they fix some of the most egregious lines of dialogue sequences? Will they add alternative appearances for party members? Will they do a ME:A Enhanced Edition with tons of fixes like CDProjekt RED? Etc.

or will they simply ride the frontloaded sales, release some minor stability patches, release the planned DLC, and then move on?

I expect the bolded.

TBH, I'm kind of worried for the franchise. If Andromeda doesn't do well, we might not be getting another Mass Effect for a long time, especially since Star Wars is becoming EA's next big focus.

I'm willing to put up with a lag in acknowledgment if it means not having to enact some obnoxious title change.

fair enough
 

Jamaro85

Member
I'm gonna have to sift through as many of these reviews I can. Many have brought up the point of Meta score not reflecting how they ended up feeling about the game themselves. Higher scoring games being disappointments to them, lower scoring games being great to them.

With that being said this kind of confirms my preconceived notions that I've taken mostly from formulating my own opinions on videos over the weeks. Playing the trial gave mixed feelings, and ultimately I can get over the animation and character model jank, but the game play and overall game design didn't really hit for me. I think I'm just getting tired of the constantly rehashed philosophy of having huge open maps filled with a bunch of points to check off of a list. With as much crap as I gave ME2 and ME3 for becoming mostly linear experiences, I'm starting to miss that kind of focus. ME:A looks to be a time consuming endeavor that has way too much tedium filling that time with going from point to point rinsing and repeating the same processes over and over.

Still picking up my pre-order from BB due to getting it for $38, but I really feel like I need to go through all of these reviews before deciding whether to dip into it.
 

ChanMan

Member
Honestly from some of the reviews I read the game sounds like it will be enjoyable to me but I am still going to wait until a few months until I jump in.
 

Griss

Member
As a huge fan of the original trilogy this is hugely (mass-ively?) disappointing, but the good thing is that at least we saw it coming a mile off.

From the very moment we first saw Peebee and then saw her 'goofy running away' animation I was thinking 'hmmmm... something not right here'. And from then on it just got worse and worse.
 
Even though it's probably a design issue and most likely can't be fixed, I hope that Bioware at least fixes some of the weird animation problems.

Either way I'm getting the game!
Cause it already shipped heh heh...
 

Lister

Banned
Oh fuck off this is some subjective shit about what games people like. We're not debating climate change or tax policy up here. Jesus christ.

Your comment is bannable, by the way, I'd editi it. I won't report you, but still.

What are we discussing and debating if not what you said? It's still not ok to come in with logical fallacies, regardless of the world impacting or triviality of the discussion, and expect to be greeted with anything but an eye roll.
 

inky

Member

From a couple of reviews I've read, it certainly feels like that.

A lot of people in his first impressions thread are starting to look outright silly, considering how they went on and on about how only GAF and RPS were seeing the pretty evident negative stuff in the game.
 

-tetsuo-

Unlimited Capacity
Both of those are great games is what it is saying to you. You may not agree but that doesn't mean that everyone feels that way about them.

Shadows of Mordor isn't even close to great. This coming from someone who likes the game a lot.


It probably means, like a lot of games shit on around here, that there's actually a pretty large fanbase that likes it, they just don't like engaging in the shit-throwing and negativity all the damned time.

that it was very well received.

Popularity does not make a game good. It makes it popular.
 
IGN gives Andromeda shit for a bad framerate, while Zelda runs at 20 fps and gets away with it...

Zelda does a -lot- of things better than Andromeda does. That is immediately apparent within the first hour.

Also, if you actually read the IGN review...

Breath of the Wild's anime-inspired art style is colorful, remarkably lively, and beautifully animated, but it comes at the cost of brief framerate hiccups and object pop-in that's most noticeable when you're playing the Switch in TV mode, where it renders at 900p, and when there are a lot of physics particle effects flying around the screen. The issues are less frequent playing on in portable mode on the 720p screen, but regardless of where I played the performance problems never significantly soured my gameplay.
 

Jarmel

Banned
From a couple of reviews I've read, it certainly feels like that.

A lot of people in his first impressions thread are starting to look outright silly, considering how they went on and on about how only GAF and RPS were seeing the pretty evident negative stuff in the game.

You could tell even a number of reviewers weren't hot on this. This wasn't some blindside sort of thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom