Well, that's simply not true
yeahh pretty bad phrasing.
I guess he's just saying calories are calories.
Well, that's simply not true
This agenda is just ridiculous.
Also, 2 minutes of google research showed me that the iron claim is wrong.
Also, vitamins?
Ingredients in an American can of Coke: Carbonated Water, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Caramel Color, Phosphoric Acid, Natural Flavors, Caffeine.
Ingredients in an apple: apple
"Calorie for Calorie"
*Snip*
I would make the fair assumption from the OP's post that they are trying to lose weight. A calorie deficit is of exclusive importance in this sense, so actually having two apples (190 calories) is actually worse than a can of coke (144 calories) for weight loss.
.
How is it ridiculous? I am well acquanted with the field of chemistry and so I am using my scientific knowledge objectively to battle common misconceptions within food.
Admittedly, Coca-Cola loses the vitamin battle, but it's a good job that literally no diet is composed of exclusively soft drinks, and that multi-vitamins exist.
Coke and vitamin pills, the diet of the future!
Well, that's one way to look at it.
Numerically, yes we see that two apples amounts to more calories, but part of weight loss is also developing the healthy life style that comes with it and that means finding healthier replacements for the bad things.
And I have a Master's degree in biology, I'm a licensed personal trainer and nutritionist, so what?
Quest Bars.
Why are you a nutritionist and not a dietician?
I think it's pretty clear that the dieticians within our society are nowhere near reaching a consensus as to what constitutes 'healthy' and what doesn't. There is so much misninformation within the world of food.
Calories In vs Calories Out, whilst trying to balance Protein/Carbs/Fats in a reasonable proportion is probably the best you can safely do.
WHAT DIET COMPANIES DONT WANT YOU TO KNOW
Shocking secret inside
My man.
Noone is saying fruit doesn'T have sugar or calories, but some fruit is great for satisfying those cravings in a better way than chocolate etc.
Calories In vs Calories Out, whilst trying to balance Protein/Carbs/Fats in a reasonable proportion is probably the best you can safely do.
lol. Well, I disagree...that consensus was reached years ago. Natural whole foods will always trump processed foods.
And no simplifying to calories in vs calories out is how one acquires deficiencies in minerals and vitamins.
Generally the micronutrients in most fruit are in very small amounts (not enough to be relevant for moderate consumption) and your body's ability to absorb said micros through fruit isn't that great so eating fruit for its micronutrients isn't as useful as old sentiment would have you believe. This is based on recent-ish research.
I'm not 100% on the details and I have to read the research more extensively, but this is my understanding.
Oh yeah, sorry.
When it comes to breakfast/lunch/dinner, I will without fail recommend whole foods. However for base level snacks I consider the difference to be relatively slim ant not worth obsessing over, it's usually helpful for people to keep these things in their diet for a while whilst cutting down, lest they want to be miserable.
Tbh though, even with processed food you'd have to try quite hard to be deficient in vitamins and minerals.
I guess he's just saying calories are calories.
Protein bars, working-out-bars, sportbars etc are designed for that purpose. Not for laying on the couch. That's not working out, brah
That's exactly what I'm saying lol, but yeah, you got it.yeahh pretty bad phrasing.
I guess he's just saying calories are calories.
Why not fruit? Bananas, apples...
Because they're pure sugar.
You heard it here folks. Whole fruits are bad for you because dey got sugar in them!
The Truth About Sugar
An interesting documentary on sugar by the BBC, I think this might help some people in the thread.
I lost a lot of weight when I switched out fruit for protein bars... which are pretty much candy with protein
I... what? I'm not saying you're lying and something tells there's more to your story than just this detail but... what? Can someone explain this please?
Did you replace 6 apples with one protein bar or what?
Was thinking this as wellQuest Bars.
I... what? I'm not saying you're lying and something tells there's more to your story than just this detail but... what? Can someone explain this please?
Did you replace 6 apples with one protein bar or what?
"Calorie for Calorie"
I would make the fair assumption from the OP's post that they are trying to lose weight. A calorie deficit is of exclusive importance in this sense, so actually having two apples (190 calories) is actually worse than a can of coke (144 calories) for weight loss.
Neither.
I'd recommend Chicken Breast/Milk/Fish/Seeds.
They'll go further in terms of satiation too.
Assuming you are a fellow chemist and this is in fact, a joke.
![]()
A good opportunity to spread this awareness photograph for those who do not get it.
It's missing amygdalin, a substance that is metabolized into hydrogen cyanide by the body and is lethal.
(found in apple seeds)