I only compared it to Zodiac in that you don't watch Zodiac as a "whodunnit". It matters more in both cases how the murders affect the detectives
Yes, but the whole
point of Zodiac is that it's about people coping with a case that seems like it should hold so much meaning but is ultimately impenetrable. That's the theme of the work and the core conflict that drives the character evolution we see.
True Detective is exploring different themes, and so it shouldn't just ape what a completely different work did.
I don't care who is killing people in 2012. I don't think -viewers- should.
That's exactly the kind of silliness I'm talking about. This is the opposite (and equally nonsensical) pole to people who just watch for "the plot" and don't pay any attention to characterization.
Truly good character work can't happen in a vacuum. When you isolate interpersonal drama from all real context, you get interminable soap opera nonsense and scenery-chewing conflict that's ultimately toothless because there are no real stakes. In the best writing, the character work and plotting are equal partners, each supporting the other -- plot gives the characters stakes, while character gives the plot meaning.
Look at a film like Heat -- the crux of the film is the character interaction between Pacino and DeNiro's characters, but the conflict and symmetry between the characters can only be resolved by resolving questions of plot: will DeNiro settle down or make a break for it? Will Pacino catch him?
True Detective is the same way. The emotional heart, and the true climax of the story, are tied up in the shifting relationship between Hart and Cohle, but the core conflict of that relationship -- in fact, the whole arc of both men's lives -- is driven by the way that the Dora Lange murder affected both of them. There's no way to actually draw that relationship to a meaningful conclusion, or to nail down the final meaning of that relationship, without simultaneously resolving the plot in some meaningful way.
- So yes, I do think the case will be solved, or as solved as it is satisfying for the audience, but not in the sense that the case is the most interesting part of the story or the part that the writer really wants to tell. It will be satisfying because I am certain that the character arcs will come to a close whether they find salvation or lose it forever. There will be closure.
Exactly.