It’s not 37% growth people. Growth itself is up 37%. Holy
how is this being misunderstood.
Let me explain.
If they were at 18 million subs and actually had 37% growth over a year they would land at 24.6 million.
If they had 18 million subs but growth had been 1 million a year in the previous year and THAT number actually went up 37% (which is what actually happened) they would have grown by 1.37 million for a total of 19.37 million. This is almost the exact total number speculated, meaning total growth is actually a smallish number. Even if it goes to 100% growth that will only be 3 million subs over a year. To hit 23 million. It’s going to need to hlike 1000% increase in growth to hit this 50 million in two years that some here are speculating.
At the current rate it won’t hit 30 million by the end of this gen. A large uptick in subs needs to happen and there can’t be a lot of churn.
That is the reality of the currently released numbers and percentages.