Lucifers Beard
Member
You’re right, it’s not a bad game, it’s a fucking terrible game. A turd that won’t flush.It's not a bad game...That an OPINION.
You’re right, it’s not a bad game, it’s a fucking terrible game. A turd that won’t flush.It's not a bad game...That an OPINION.
I thought Fallen Order was leaked as coming out and Apex Legends is still running and receiving updates.
Hyperbole…this is why I trust industry reviews…and metacritic, they are more accurate than the average user spewing this BS. Yes the game has problems but it actually is a fun game. It needs patches.You’re right, it’s not a bad game, it’s a fucking terrible game. A turd that won’t flush.
The maps are horrible, that's one of the main reasons why i disliked this game.
We are progressing, step by step.Yes the game has problems
Not sure what you mean mate. Fallen Order came out 2 years ago. Yes Apex is getting updates regularly too. It's more the forward thinking e.g. fallen order sequel, TF3 (I want that campaign so bad). Respawn have been killing it, I don't know why you'd task a studio head to another studio/franchise and risk that wonderful formula at all.
Yes, let's hope he has all the weapons at his disposal to get his way, and it's not just an empty title.Having a COD guy like Zampella is a big move depending if you liked COD2.
Not sure what you mean mate. Fallen Order came out 2 years ago. Yes Apex is getting updates regularly too. It's more the forward thinking e.g. fallen order sequel, TF3 (I want that campaign so bad). Respawn have been killing it, I don't know why you'd task a studio head to another studio/franchise and risk that wonderful formula at all.
In short, the fate of all of those games was written before this change.
Apologies if I misunderstood you thinking you implied that those games were left aside in favour for BF.
I just don't want to spread a good thing too thin. Respawn/Vince have made some of my all time favourite games in the TF series, Apex & Fallen Order, I suppose I'm cautious about them shaking that up.? Well its likely cause he alone doesn't make those games by himself, he can run the BF series and still head other projects.... Think about what you are even saying, he was running things at ReSpawn while the did both Apex and Fallen order....did you not realize that when you posted?
So I think their studio will be just fine as he alone doesn't just make all things there, Fallen Order 2 is likely deep enough into development where his input has already shaped the game
Fair point mate.
I just don't want to spread a good thing too thin. Respawn/Vince have made some of my all time favourite games in the TF series, Apex & Fallen Order, I suppose I'm cautious about them shaking that up.
BF games are 3 year projects.
Well, now that was fast.
I don't think he can't save it though.
It already has this.BF with crisp gunplay? Would be enticing.
If COD is 10/10 then BF is a 6.5/10. For my taste anyway.It already has this.
Not for my taste.If COD is 10/10 then BF is a 6.5/10. For my taste anyway.
If COD is 10/10 then BF is a 6.5/10. For my taste anyway.
I need dem mechs in the next BF aka 2143 lol
That's pretty much the crux of itWell it depends on taste tbh.
I feel BF has crisp gunplay and COD is more of a arena thing. I like the feel of measuring bullet drop, leading shots etc. To me that is more fun so I'm sure its a each his own type thing.
Wow, omg, it has Santa, ima need to buy this asap!!!"expanding the narrative, storytelling, and character development opportunities in the Battlefield series"
Oh and I want to meet the guy on the team that though "22 weapons in our game is enough, right?"
Is this your "certain type of players, not casual":
I've been playing BF since I was 15 and 2042 isn't Battlefield. It's R6 Siege meet Warzone with a little bit of recent BF elements added in the mix. It is a shitty entry and months of bugfixes won't change the core of the game, which is NOT a Battlefield.
Enjoy it, but don't come with this statement.
Accepting that a game can have problems and still be a good game…We are progressing, step by step.
Soon: acceptance come on I believe in you!
It’s not hyperbole at all and you’re trusting industry reviews where most of their experience with the game was held by EA and the experience was tightly controlled by them then I don’t know what to tell you.Hyperbole…this is why I trust industry reviews…and metacritic, they are more accurate than the average user spewing this BS. Yes the game has problems but it actually is a fun game. It needs patches.
2042 has nothing to do anymore with BF games that were so popular
most matches last for 20-30 minutes though? I know because they are timed...lol.Battlefield is going to need to figure out how to move on from 20 second gameplay loops and 15 minute matches.
That formula is going to have a hell of a time competing over the next 5+ years.
If the game/server don't crash of course.most matches last for 20-30 minutes though? I know because they are timed...lol.
If the game/server don't crash of course.
And then at the end of the match, go back to main menu to find a new game... because we can't stay on the serv. No automatic map change while we all stay on the server.
Because this is probably too hard to do and this wasn't in EVERY fuckin Battlefield right?
I'm not playing this game anymore, I put a few hours in it, it was shit, I uninstalled. Now I play Dishonored II/Halo/It Takes Too if you wanna know.Oh dear child...
I have never had a server crash in game. I have had them not connect me though. The server browser should definitely return. You seem real butthurt about 2042, maybe go play something else?
most matches last for 20-30 minutes though? I know because they are timed...lol.
What a strange response. I’d be upset with BF2042 if I had paid the price EA are asking for. It’s clear that a huge amount of people are playing something else since the player base just fell on its face.Oh dear child...
I have never had a server crash in game. I have had them not connect me though. The server browser should definitely return. You seem real butthurt about 2042, maybe go play something else?
have you played breakthrough? Lots of lengthy engagements in that mode if you are good. Conquest is in a bad state with this game honestly. The maps are too big and too barren. The map issues are less noticeable in breakthrough.Yeah, it's probably more the 20 second gameplay loop that's going to have difficulty moving forward.
You don't want to answer when someone has actual arguments?have you played breakthrough? Lots of lengthy engagements in that mode if you are good. Conquest is in a bad state with this game honestly. The maps are too big and too barren. The map issues are less noticeable in breakthrough.
I know you are a big BR fan, how do you reconcile the 20 second engagements in those games? Are you wanting BF to become more arena like? Guess I am not sure how to fix your beef.
I didn't respond because you are just an over emotional child (and you type like one) and that "rebuke" wasn't worth my time. You put a few hours into a game? I put 100+ into it. I don't think BF 2042 is in a good place, I have been very critical of the game. When I rebuked your arguments initially you didn't listen to anything I said and doubled down on stupid...just like a spoiled child would.I'm not playing this game anymore, I put a few hours in it, it was shit, I uninstalled. Now I play Dishonored II/Halo/It Takes Too if you wanna know.
Anyway, first, act like a grown up person and don't call other "child" if you wanna be taken seriously
Second, you quoted me on the first page, then I responded and... you disappeared. You don't have anything to say?
Finally you don't have problem (well you do but whatever) ≠ there isn't problems.
Now I'm waiting your response on this.
Oh sorry my lord but you will learn that English isn't my main language. We can talk in French to see how you doing? I'm sure I have a lot of fun.I didn't respond because you are just an over emotional child (and you type like one) and that "rebuke" wasn't worth my time. You put a few hours into a game? I put 100+ into it. I don't think BF 2042 is in a good place, I have been very critical of the game. When I rebuked your arguments initially you didn't listen to anything I said and doubled down on stupid...just like a spoiled child would.
I never said there weren't problems with servers crashing, just in my 100+ hours I've never had them, ergo they can't be that common. That said, the common server issues I got A LOT of and they were super annoying (unable to connect, or joining servers that wouldn't start).
I am not apologizing for DICE's mess but when I see bullshit being thrown around I am going to correct it. Saying BF2042 isn't a BF game because of superfluous features is just dumb. That doesn't mean I don't wish those features where in the game.
have you played breakthrough? Lots of lengthy engagements in that mode if you are good. Conquest is in a bad state with this game honestly. The maps are too big and too barren. The map issues are less noticeable in breakthrough.
I know you are a big BR fan, how do you reconcile the 20 second engagements in those games? Are you wanting BF to become more arena like? Guess I am not sure how to fix your beef.
I see and you make a good point. One of the things I dislike about 2042 is the 128 player matches. In 64 player matches a single player could wipe a squad and survive. In 128 player matches that same player can only kill 2 people before the 6 others down him. This is exactly what you are talking about and it is caused by the player count, breakthrough does not help this at all it just keeps you in the "action" more with less running.So when I'm referring to "20 second gameplay loops" I'm referring to "spawning - run to action - engagement - death". If you're good, the loop lasts a bit longer. If you're bad, it may be a bit shorter.
Traditional style Call of Duty multiplayer always had the least interesting and shortest gameplay loop to me. Why it was wildly popular I don't know, but it looks like that's fading quickly now.
I also think in terms of engagements (time you spot or are spotted by enemy, to someone dying) BR has the longest, most interesting engagements. I've recorded numerous Fortnite clips where engagements last 3+ minutes because the game gives you longer distance engagements, higher TTK, and a wider variety of game mechanics to play with.
In Battlefield, CoD, Halo etc...the engagement time (spotting enemy to someone dying) is, I'm guessing, an average of ~3.5 seconds. In BRs, that number is way longer.
Right now, Battlefield is really struggling with drama and repetition. It lacks drama because death is near meaningless and player performance isn't tied to match outcome. Who cares if you got 5 kills in a row, it had very little impact on a 64 v 64 player match. It also looks pretty repetitive from the gameplay clips I'm seeing. Run towards action - shoot sh**.
The market has now grown up playing BR. Battlefield needs to figure out how the lessons of BR can fit into the Battlefield franchise. Right now, it's a war game that doesn't move players emotions.
PS: I'll check out some Breakthrough to see if they're headed in the right direction.
And why would i post it here?Oh boy a user with no pfp as usual.