What was he referencing? Can you explain? Any evidence of a DoJ coverup? No? Then we're done here. I've already gone over his post to death at this point, but you ignored pretty much everything I said about it.
.
I did listen, I just disagreed with you. You ignored my points of disagreement and are simply repeating your assertions.
He heard a description of a black male in the vicinity of a store carrying cigarillos who had been involved in a robbery. He then attempted to arrest him. This isn't racial profiling. It's following a detailed description to apprehend an individual, with a very high likelihood of this person being that individual. It did turn out this was in fact the individual referred to on the radio. You seem to have a definition of profiling that would seem to rule out the apprehension of a person based on the detailed description of a suspect.
A quick Google search couldn't turn up much on this, but in any case, it's not relevant to whether this was a legitimate act of self defense.
He assaulted a police officer, attempted to seize his firearm and then attempted to escape. These are all crimes. No, they should not carry the death penalty, but they do give a police officer a reason to shoot you.
I specifically cited the DoJ report, not the local PD reports, and referred to the testimony of witnesses other than the police officer, as well as DNA and other physical evidence. You have ignored all of this.
Also mind your language.
