yet even there, you don't just have 1 type of person.
You can get hired to do moderator stuff literally all over the US as many of those jobs are remote lol
To my understanding, more then half of Twitter works remotely, but that isn't really shocking tbh.
I don't even understand where this shit comes from where people think 100% of any company MUST believe in some concept based on the location of the main headquarters.
So you have people that work for Home Depot that are not conservative, you have people that work for Walmart that are not Christian...i'm shocked I even needed to fucking say that lol I don't know how you'd ever get any company to have 100% all people agreeing with the same shit, you can't even have that in any party, you can't have that even in a religion, but hey a company will magically do the unthinkable and have 100% staff that all believe the same things, verbatim? Unlikely friend..., like massively unlikely.
Shit, for all you know most of them are not even based in the united states lol Never mind "San Francisco", they might not even be in the US at all bud. Not everyone really cares about this shit....
It clear you have never worked in tech in San Francisco.
I’m sure out of the millions who work in tech there, maybe 2 per company aren’t crazy batshit SJW. To deny the culture in that part of the country isn’t influencing their corporate decisions is pure denial.
I mean sure, but not to this degree. I've worked at Home Depot back in 2012-2016, I've never been given some guideline to ignore theft, criminal activity, harassment, etc if the person that did do the crime was conservatives JUST cause the person that owns Home Depot is...
So even if someone comes to me and is like "well of course they won't arrest the thief and press charges they agree with him cause how he votes" , i'm going to call BS. Look...someone owning a company doesn't automatically mean all issues come down to those views and that 100% of all staff, employees etc all agree with those views full stop.
Can someone have a guideline to ignore certain people with some concept of protection or something? Sure, but this Jason person isn't some massive entity that they'd lose business over or can break the company or anything weird like that.
Moderating is not like working at Home Depot.
Most moderation is done via algorithm, that scrub your data, looking for certain keywords and data points. Twitter can easily create a profile, run filter comparing real users to that algorithm, and have their moderators segregate certain users based off that profile.
It’s not a secret that certain accounts are allowed to get away with bloody murder based off certain attributes. For example blue check marks are allowed to troll more heavily, post sensitive stuff and essentially operate with more immunity than non blue check marks.
As other users have previously pointed out in this thread, this is targeted harassment, but is Jason getting trouble for that? Of course not, because in the Twitter profile he is a journalist, employed by a corporate entity, and not pushing any controversial opinion. Try doing that as a random schmuck, and see how fast your ass is flagged.