You didn't easily list 20 games, if you could then you would have easily been able to list 20 games for every year (which is what you implied you were going to do but stopped short)
The issue is you are now arguing emotionally or/and for points instead of on the subject. You can search moby, GS, Faqs, MC, and see that by year, which you can organize them with, you'll find many AAA games, especially retail but the rule applies to digital too, are mostly these type of games (chunk of Nintendo games excluded). You're not actually looking at games you're arguing with nothing, if this response was made after you looked at the game releases since 2013 till now, by year, that I'd find you're argument possibly true, but you didn't you only responded just to respond.
The fact you know a few games that don't met these two caused you to oddly believe that 10% isn't a lot of games, that's still a good amount of games, like I said you're underplaying how many games have actually released.
I'd recommend looking at games lists on MC, which have it by year, it's not all games, some are missing, but it'll give you a pretty clear idea that it's most of the games released. You'll easily see that the few dozens of games you're thinking of are at best 10% of the market. Then come back.
Aight, let's go, 2016!
DOOM, Uncharted 4, The Last Guardian, Overwatch, Inside, The Witness, Dishonored 2, WoW Legion, Pokémon Moon, Ratchet & Clank, Overcooked.
Short year that year (because of WoW Legion, of course), but do you know why it was so easy for me to do that? Because I didn't have to pick and choose anything. I didn't have to go to a website, I had to open an excel file and literally just listed the
only new games I played that year, hence some notable exceptions. I could've cheated and listed something like Titanfall 2, but I didn't play that until this year (my mistake).
Not one of those games was broken/incomplete at launch. Again, am I just magically only playing the 10% of games that are fine, year after year?
You can't disprove me because your argument has absolutely no basis in reality. It's why you've yet to provide
any evidence whatsoever other than "dude just go to Metacritic and do all the work yourself!" If your argument is that every year we get a ton of shitty shovelware, then it's no argument at all. Those games that tiny pockets of idiots buy have basically no bearing on the industry and are not representative of it as a whole. And even then, most of those games are just poor. Your entire argument is that
90% of games launch broken or bare-bones. If that's the case, you shouldn't have had any trouble providing actual evidence of that.
I've wasted enough time trying to bring you down to reality, I'm out. You're talking absolute gibberish. At least this one didn't get locked, right?
