Leyasu
Banned
lol says the guy that is only not banned because the mods want to keep you for comedy value.Give him time... the results will come and it will be proved one or other side.
lol says the guy that is only not banned because the mods want to keep you for comedy value.Give him time... the results will come and it will be proved one or other side.
Where I have said that? I simply explained to you how things work but nope you are just solely interested in console war.GTFO. So are saying with a straight fact the Dirt 5 maxed the XsX? Yes or no?
Guy... you makes no sense at all.lol says the guy that is only not banned because the mods want to keep you for comedy value.
?? That is exactly what you are implying. SO answer the question.Where I have said that? I simply explained to you how thing work but nope you are just solely interested in console war.
No it's not what I'm implying. And the clown it's you because you barely get it of what I'm talking about and the xbox 360 car models comment shows how childish you are because no one has ever substained the lower poly car was a performance issue?? That is exactly what you are implying. SO answer the question.
Because if they had had to cut corners and optimise the game to hell and back for it to run the higher detail models, then following what you and clowns like ethomaz are trying to say, they would have had to drop the 120hz mode entirely. The game was already having trouble running xbox 360 car models @ 120hz, so following your line of thinking, 120 hz would be absolutely impossible.
He keep posting unrelated replies to what you wrote.No it's not what I'm implying.
Ok, I’ll play your game.No it's not what I'm implying. And the clown it's you because you barely get it of what I'm talking about and the xbox 360 car models comment shows how childish you are because no one has ever substained the lower poly car was a performance issue
That is false.Ok, I’ll play your game.
I reckon that the XsX is running dirt 5 120hz at 720p dynamic. Mostly averaging 668p with dips down to 540p.
Yeah, but now it’s running higher detail assets. Cuts will have had to have been made right!?That is false.
Seires X runs Dirt 5 at DRS 900-1440p very close to the target 120fps before the patch.
I don't know what you are trying to say yet.Yeah, but now it’s running higher detail assets. Cuts will have had to have been made right!?
Of course we don’t. But I was under the impression that the lack of cache scrubbers, split memory and too many CUs per cluster had bottlenecked the system.I don't know what you are trying to say yet.
There isn't performance tests for the new patch... they chanced the level of detail on the profile config file to match what PS5 had... so it is indeed rendering now more polygons on screen but we don't know how it affected the performance.
That is your assumptions lolOf course we don’t. But I was under the impression that the lack of cache scrubbers, split memory and too many CUs per cluster had bottlenecked the system.
So it stands to reason right, that to maintain the frame rate, compromises elsewhere will have to be made.
I don't know what you are trying to say yet.
There isn't performance tests for the new patch... they chanced the level of detail on the profile config file to match what PS5 had... so it is indeed rendering now more polygons on screen but we don't know how it affected the performance.
The reality is, running the settings xbox had would've lead to the same result.None of anything you said changes the fact the PS5 had the worst frame rate of the two anyway in 120fps mode. You're dealing in what ifs, the DF comparison showed clearly on one track in particular the PS5 frame rate tanked hard.
Plus no VRR.
No not at all. I am just going along with you and the others. That is why you are clamoring for a perf testThat is your assumptions lol
I'm not sure about that... I'm replying correctly with facts to all his weird questions and wrong assumptions.You're starting to give Thelastword a run for his money
Bullshit.No not at all. I am just going along with you and the others. That is why you are clamoring for a perf test
Ok. I believe you.I'm not sure about that... I'm replying correctly with facts to all his weird questions and wrong assumptions.
Bullshit.
I never assumed the performance after the patch is lower or equal to before the patch lol
We indeed need a new performance test.
You created too much things in your head.
Well now it turns out that PS5 has a performance issue on one of its modes. I guess the XSX version is the best now. Now lets see what conclusions you draw from that.
Well, now it cooled down on Xbox, but got hotter on PS5.The game was rushed to launch and obviously came in hot.... A lot hotter on the XsX than the PS5. They have spent the last 6 weeks working on it. You can also bet that they will be still "patching" this in Jan and Feb next year.
The reality is, running the settings xbox had would've lead to the same result.
Even so it was 120fps most of the time but sure it tanked at the start of races. Series x also had dips despite running vastly inferior settings.
You know how the series x fares now its running similar settings?
I'll wait....
Its probably the variable clocks and smartshift technology, unlike them consistently more powerful sustained clocks.Well, now it cooled down on Xbox, but got hotter on PS5.
Still performing worse than PS5, but looks similar.
Yeah, I saw that their tinkering introduced some problems on the PS5. They will fix soon enoughWell, now it cooled down on Xbox, but got hotter on PS5.
Why you need to be so childish? WTF it's your point? The level of stupidity of your reply is unbearable and you act as you was legitimate to have such idiotic attitude.Ok, I’ll play your game.
I reckon that the XsX is running dirt 5 120hz at 720p dynamic. Mostly averaging 668p with dips down to 540p.
Every game as...? We can be a bit more specific?It will be interesting to see how much better the xbox series x version is than the ps5 version.
Seems like every game that has been patched on the series x is now performing better.
The tides have definitely turned!
Every game as...? We can be a bit more specific?
Does MicroSoft or some Television company pay you each time you mention VRR?Do I know! No I don't, but since my Xbox supports VRR it doesn't matter to me anyway.
Hmm.We cannot
EVERY game, Sony might as well give up. Got it?Every game as...? We can be a bit more specific?
Plot twist; Sony pays Riky to market VRR for their upcoming TVsDoes MicroSoft or some Television company pay you each time you mention VRR?
Hmm.
Last post because you have started to pull out the big guns now calling me childish... Your warrior comments and history is available for all to see. You and a few others are in every thread talking with conviction about a bottlenecked system without the first clue of anything, then trying to claim that cross gen software is maxing the system. But when you get called out on it, you get angry and defensive, and pretend that that is not what you are claiming....Why you need to be so childish? WTF it's your point? The level of stupidity of your reply is unbearable and you act as you was legitimate to have such idiotic attitude.