I'm sorry but here's the user making a pretty definitive statement here:
Again, I am completely understanding that some folks just want to buy into this without any evidence.
But for something this user has said multiple times they won't reveal for security/livelihood reasons, they sure keep talking about it in definitive ways.
What would you have me do ? I am reserving my judgment and trying to be as impartial as possible. However at every given turn I'm being quoted and told to accept what the user said because they may or may not have good rapport here.
And on top of that, the user has since themselves said they don't have any proof that their original accusation from 3 years ago is still valid.
It's an open and shut case here as far as I'm concerned. The user believe they were given some information, none of us have seen it, there is 0% evidence to back it up and now even said user has exclaimed they can't prove it anymore.
That's the thing, almost every other topic about DF has the same bad faith actors using the same bad faith "but DF are MS shills" arguments.
It's .. tiring .. to say the least.
-
I absolutely hate that I'm bringing up Heisenberg over and over, I'm sure they're a great poster otherwise, but this half-baked 'evidence' kerfuffle has just been a shitshow.