Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Another bootlicker response.
Sod off.
Neither your memes nor your insults can disguise the fact you don't have any arguments. All your posts attest to is your mountainous ignorance.
You completely miss the mark on everything. The bottom line is, what the company did was 1) unethical 2) hurt the company 3) hurt their employees 4) hurt the shareholders 5) hurt their trust with industry partners 6) likely significantly and perhaps irreparably tarnished their reputation with consumers
I have already addressed all of these so-called points.
If this isn't a scenario where heads should roll, I don't know what is.
Exactly. Your ignorance is noted.
It's possible heads will roll. It's just the heads you want to see decapitated are probably involved in the process of picking which will! Can you not see the conundrum? Of course you cannot. Your childish sulk must go on.
Additionally, you simply lack the info required to make the call. You don't even know who the CEOs are, let alone the critical and at this point confidential info required to determine the who, why, when and how of the screwup.
Your childish sulk must go on.
What went down was pretty unheard of for a game of this profile. You'd be foolish to think the person that greenlit the release (or allowed it to get to the point of no return where there wasn't a better option given how firm they had held on a holiday release), should ABSOLUTELY be shit canned.
You want the board to sack themselves?
As previously explained, be careful what you wish for.
I have no doubt shareholders will be reading your posts for guidance. How could they not? They're filled with factual info, jampacked with insights. It's one rational argument after the other.
And yeah, there are plenty of people in senior management that likely DIDN'T AGREE with the decision that should probably step up for the good of the studio.
"Plenty of people in senior management"?
How could you possibly know this?
Quote and source, please.
But you're right - we don't know the EXACT specifics. That's kind of irrelevant.
How would you know the specifics are irrelevant before knowing what the specifics are?
Please.
You have already decided how you want this to play out. It's emotionalism. Pure and simple. No facts will ever change your mind, because this isn't about facts and reality.
Your childish sulk must go on.
What happened, happened, and the decision to greenlight a release comes from the very top. It's not that complicated.
Manage your bistro.
This is not your company for you to manage.
Your childish sulk shall go on.