Bro indeedWhat are you talking about bro?
i guess the ”bro gamers” still play cod all the time
- boom, headshot!!
Last edited:
Bro indeedWhat are you talking about bro?
Serious question: why is there never an Asian guy front and centre? Or an Indian guy?
Not "sexy" enough? Not TRENDY enough!
Blacks are the only ones that exist besides whites! And they only started to exist the last few years when people started complaining enough!
They're not doing it for the diversity dollar, they're doing it because they really care! Cuz the upper management aren't all rich white dudes, SUDDENLY BEHIND THE SCENES THEY ALL BECAME DIVERSE!!! They secretly transformed behind the scenes and became black dudes and white women!
Fuck your transparent bullshit and anybody too stupid to see through it.
For the record I don't actually give two fucks that they're doing this, I don't give two shits about seeing more/less white guys, I just find it so incredibly tacky and fake that they think any of this comes off as genuine. But the people who actually pretend to care about this apparently love condescension and blatant pandering since they're THAT desperate for token representation.
pathetic.gif
Is that supposed to be an insult?Bro indeed
i guess the ”bro gamers” still play cod all the time
- boom, headshot!!
What in the HOLY JESUS CHRIST am I looking at!? A black man and a woman with two 50 year old men, all without helmets by the way, in the Pacific theater of WWII? Or Vietnam? This is the gayest shit I've ever fucking seen. I never thought a company would ever make an even worse version of Battlefield V after that obvious failure.
jesusThis is why I still love CoD. They do it mostly right and are not pandering as much.
Soviet female snipers were badasses and wrecking havoc on Germans. So they include Soviet sniper which is historically accurate, not like that BFV mess. And she’s hot!
Last year Cold war trailer was revealed in WZ, they set the gameplay demo for the ps5 event right after.Seeing this it doesn't seem like it will be revealed in any Sony event.
Does that mean there won't be a Sony event?
So will there be a Sony event on August the 19th or what???
They only started putting women, blacks, etc on game covers when it became trendy.
They don't care, but they sure as hell want you to think they care.
Dont make it so obvious doing a 180.So what's the alternative?
Dont make it so obvious doing a 180.
It's like most companies catering to Pride month in June.
Check out all the company logos and I'd say about 30% change their logo to be rainbow colours when Pride month is the trend. It already passed, but next year check out Linkedin job boards where it's an easy way to see tons of job postings and logos one after another.
The second July flips over, all the logos change back to normal and you dont hear anything about supporting Pride people till next year. My company is the same. Once July rolls around, there will be zero content, company emails and memos about supporting gay and lesbians until next year around May when it leads up to it in June.
Less obvious would be making media as a whole more representative of real life demographics. But the trend lately is jam as many minorities and niche groups into a picture, tv ad or game.I guess that's my question as far as the cover is concerned. How would they not make it obvious? And a 2nd question.........is it really that bad that it is an obvious change?
Do i have to guard a van in new call of duty?
So what's the alternative?
Black Americans made up a significant number of WW2 veterans compared to other minorities. I don't see why it would be problematic to feature one on a cover for WW2 era games. I am pretty sure no matter the situation or "trendiness" there would always be someone like you that would claim it's forced diversity and fake.Like I said they can keep doing it but they have to know how fake it looks right now.
Why not focus on another race that's not so trendy? If diversity is the real reason then it doesn't need to be this transparent focus on black men/women.
Like I said earlier, give us a COD that focuses on one character, make it an Asian guy for example. Or an Indian guy.
Like I said they can keep doing it but they have to know how fake it looks right now.
Why not focus on another race that's not so trendy? If diversity is the real reason then it doesn't need to be this transparent focus on black men/women.
Like I said earlier, give us a COD that focuses on one character, make it an Asian guy for example. Or an Indian guy.
Way before it was trendy I thought it would have been legitimately cool to have an RE lead character that was black. Had nothing to do with virtue signaling or anything. I thought on my own terms as a kid that hey, we don't see this often, would be pretty cool to have a black lead. And that still hasn't happened. But you don't see me going on crying about the RE team racist or any of that shit. And yeah there were Sheva, but for some reason I specifically thought black male would be cool. And Sheva was the secondary character anyhow.
But the point is they should be doing this cuz they really want to, not because of societal pressures. What they're doing lacks any confidence. It feels entirely forced and pander-y.
Did you see anyone (except for the biggest idiots) complain about Faith in Mirror's Edge? There was no trend to insert Asian women into games at the time and it felt totally natural and like something they actually wanted to do. And nobody complained about it, nobody thought it felt forced.
That's how you do proper representation, by actually wanting to do it and making lead characters that are "minorities".