Beautiful
These are awesome. Not sure how they managed to do that.And we have more!
Beautiful
These are awesome. Not sure how they managed to do that.And we have more!
But the majority do not want her out, she DID win the elections,
The majority DOES want an impeachment, and theres legal grounds, so what bullshit excuse you got now?
You are forgeting the BILLIONS of people who stayed at home
They are doing laser projections mapped to the congress building ?
Holy shit how much money does this people have ?
³ said:UNE
MTS
CUT
CMP
Ok ... WHO LOVES SOME LORD OF THE RINGS OR BRAVEHEART ?
Because tomorrow is taking shape a huge battlefield at Av Paulista.
FROM ONEEEEE SIDEEE, 21 barracks of well eaten¹ pro-impeachment people with the Militar Police on their side²
AND ON THE OTHER SIDE, JUST 260 METERS AWAY ... Lula and EVERYONE THE MILITARY POLICE LOVES TO BEAT UP
¹ - FIESP building gave Filet Mignon for the pro-impeachment people
² - Rumors are that the Military Police will be VERY one sided
³ - images found after a fast google search, might refer to different times those groups were beaten
I feel it would be good to clarify the different ways the President can end up leaving her office before 2018 and the reasons behind them.
The first would be to renounce her position which is an unilateral action on her part.
Second would be with the Superior Electoral Tribunal (TSE) to invalidate her presidential mandate and also of the vice president. There where several different actions going on in this tribunal that were merged into one today regarding this. The main points of this actions involves what was discovered during the Lava Jato operation that illegal money from the Petrolao scandal made its way into the 2014 presidential election. This allegation grows stronger with each new plea bargain done with collaborators detailing even further the corruption scandal.
Third would be via an accusation of a common crime commited by the President. Theoretically if the allegation that Rousseff was acting with the intent of disrupting the investigations done by the Federal Justice, the attourney general could denounce her and it would go to a vote on the house of representatives. If accepted then she gets removed from office for a certain amount of time and theres a trial conducted by the Supreme Court(STF).
Fourth is the Impeachment route which requires the presence of a crime of responsability. The ongoing Impeachment request in Congress considers that her administration has repeatedly broken fiscal law when effectively public banks were giving loans to the government by paying for government expenses without receiving money from the state to conduct these transactions and only being paid at a later date in order to mask the real situation of the state finances. There also is the claim that the President has created new credit lines without the autorization of Congress which is considered forgery, which is grave since it has her own signatures on said papers and responsability can't be offloaded to the actions of her staff. This point is bound to be a problem because the Vice President has been shown to also have done this so if the President is impeached with this as one of the justifications then the VP also have the risk of suffering the same process, even if he did not have the autonomy to go against the government economic directive. Lastly there is the claim that the President as being responsible for the Executive power is not doing her job of keeping things properly under the law by keeping members of her cabinet after new facts discovered show that they have some association with the petrolao scandal. This one gets worse considering that she not only keeps people under investigation in her cabinet she even brought in the former president Lula to be part of her cabinet when not only hes under investigation but when theres an arrest warrant currently being analysed to see if it will be executed or not. If the Impeachment process goes foward in the house of representatives the process then goes to the Senate where she will be removed from office for some time and the trial will be conducted by the senators with the Chief Justice presiding the sessions.
If theres anything wrong with this summary please clarify.
I feel it would be good to clarify the different ways the President can end up leaving her office before 2018 and the reasons behind them.
The first would be to renounce her position which is an unilateral action on her part.
Second would be with the Superior Electoral Tribunal (TSE) to invalidate her presidential mandate and also of the vice president. There where several different actions going on in this tribunal that were merged into one today regarding this. The main points of this actions involves what was discovered during the Lava Jato operation that illegal money from the Petrolao scandal made its way into the 2014 presidential election. This allegation grows stronger with each new plea bargain done with collaborators detailing even further the corruption scandal.
Third would be via an accusation of a common crime commited by the President. Theoretically if the allegation that Rousseff was acting with the intent of disrupting the investigations done by the Federal Justice, the attourney general could denounce her and it would go to a vote on the house of representatives. If accepted then she gets removed from office for a certain amount of time and theres a trial conducted by the Supreme Court(STF).
Fourth is the Impeachment route which requires the presence of a crime of responsability. The ongoing Impeachment request in Congress considers that her administration has repeatedly broken fiscal law when effectively public banks were giving loans to the government by paying for government expenses without receiving money from the state to conduct these transactions and only being paid at a later date in order to mask the real situation of the state finances. There also is the claim that the President has created new credit lines without the autorization of Congress which is considered forgery, which is grave since it has her own signatures on said papers and responsability can't be offloaded to the actions of her staff. This point is bound to be a problem because the Vice President has been shown to also have done this so if the President is impeached with this as one of the justifications then the VP also have the risk of suffering the same process, even if he did not have the autonomy to go against the government economic directive. Lastly there is the claim that the President as being responsible for the Executive power is not doing her job of keeping things properly under the law by keeping members of her cabinet after new facts discovered show that they have some association with the petrolao scandal. This one gets worse considering that she not only keeps people under investigation in her cabinet she even brought in the former president Lula to be part of her cabinet when not only hes under investigation but when theres an arrest warrant currently being analysed to see if it will be executed or not. If the Impeachment process goes foward in the house of representatives the process then goes to the Senate where she will be removed from office for some time and the trial will be conducted by the senators with the Chief Justice presiding the sessions.
If theres anything wrong with this summary please clarify.
Its crazy this thread hasn't got more posts, really crazy times in global politics
Some impressive pics of parades in São Paulo
Brazil's President of the Chamber of Deputies, Eduardo Cunha, is now a defendant in the same case where Lula is being judged. The decision has been made unanimously by the Supreme Court (10 votes x 0).
http://g1.globo.com/politica/operac...dium=share-bar-desktop&utm_campaign=share-bar
It's like watching the Season Finale of a FUCKING FANTASTIC series, keep the good news coming!
You're next, Aécio!
FROM ONEEEEE SIDEEE, 21 barracks of well eaten¹ pro-impeachment people with the Militar Police on their side²
3 of March, look at the date
I just want to watch brazil burn.
Meanwhile dolar is dropping. It's R$3.62 right now. Disney, here we go.
5 gas bombs total and some water and then they let the people stay on one road and even camp on the street ... how cute !
In any barely serious country, the mere thought of appointing someone who is under heavy investigation to a top level position witihin the government would bring immediate hell to the president, who would, of course, back off and appoint someone else.
I'll admit my wrong, I did not know the issues in such good detail so probably i should have not defended my point of view like i did. In any case, I'm 100% against corruption so, if Dilma, Lula or whoever is found guilty of it i don't give two shits about them, they must pay for it. Having said that, looking at many of the protesters claims makes me vomit more than any corruption scandal. The classiest, elitist, racist and religious extremist reactions being displayed by large part of those crowds is just sickening. You should be addressing that too ASAP.
This is a fun headline :
40 of the 60 politicians in the impeachment comission received money from companies that are investigated by Lava Jato and 4 politicians directly being investigated by Lava Jato.
How do you fight this kind of internalized corruption ? =P
One step at a time. What's the alternative right now? Do nothing? Allow these criminals to remain because there are others we cant do anything about right now?
The protests in 2013 allowed the passing of a law allowing "delação premiada" ("snitching laws" lol) and that in turn helped the Car Wash Investigation become what it is and the things it has already accomplished.
Who knows what else will come from this, One step at the time. We get better a little each time.
sometimes I feel like I've being played by both sides...
Welp, time to stock toilet paper, we are going to be a new Venezuela. Where's Machado?
My thoughts exactly. Baby steps to a (hopefully) big jump in our democracy in the future.
In any barely serious country, the mere thought of appointing someone who is under heavy investigation to a top level position witihin the government would bring immediate hell to the president, who would, of course, back off and appoint someone else.
Not in Brazil, though, where the president not only appoints this guy as a top Minister, but effectively joins him in battling the investigations, criticizing the institutions that are supposed to do just that.
He may be innocent, but what sane president would simply go ahead with it instead of appointing someone else while the investigations come to a conclusion? Which sane president would deliberately tie himiself/herself to a guy who is in the verge of having his prison demanded? Which barely sane party would'd rather risk its image by appointing a potential crimminal, instead of moving away from him?
It maybe be legal - the guy has not been convicted of anything yet - but it sure is unethical and frankly just stupid. You don't do that. You don't associate your government with the biggest target in a corruption network investigation. You don't laugh on the face of the judiciary system. You don't go around ignoring the clues that tell this guy is envolved on most everything that came before - and that already lead to the arrestment of more than a dozen members of your government and combined convictions of 1.000 years in jail.
It's political suicide and it should be. There's no other way around it.
I've been looking into the situation in Brazil for the last couple of days and while I won't presume to know as much as half the people here, this post. +1
This is political suicide. Anyone with half a mind would know this, so the only reason I can assume that someone, who gets to be President of one of the largest countries in the world, would do this, is that this guys has something on her. There are only two outcomes from the President's decision that makes sense to me.
1. She gives him up. Drop him like it's going out of fashion and pray he doesn't spill the beans on any dirt he has on me. If that happens, she might just get through without being impeached. (Probably too late for that now.)
2. She escalates. She brings the Army in, declares a State of Emergency.Except she can't. I keep hearing that there is a big threat that this is all just a setup for Military Government to be installed. There is support from the population, but how big that support is anyone's guess.
This last one is the worst option and I don't think she will take it. This has gotten too far and it will be impossible to put this all onto one person. I wouldn't be surprised if a transitional government was created to keep order until new elections could be organised. This whole movement and political climate fascinates me. Am I wrong in my assumptions?
Feel free to share your views in detail. This is a discussion forum.
First, it's ridiculous to call Lula the most corrupt president of a country that, just after the dictatorship, had people like Sarney and Collor on top. And Fernando Henrique had a huge amount of corruption scandals, like buying votes for his second term as president.
The protests are not about "corruption", they are against the government in specific. They started before the Lava-Jato investigations got big (actually when Dilma won the second time) and everything is against the PT, nothing against Cunha, PSDB and other corrupt politicians.
It is a classical right wing protest since they can't take 15 years of left-wing government. It's full of people calling for a return of the military dictatorship, posters saying that Brasil must go back to being right-wing (endireita Brasil) and criticizing PT's supposed communism (which is bullshit). In interviews with protesters you also see a lot of attacks against any aid programs, with people calling poor people parasites or vagabundos (lazy bums).
One of the most applauded politicians in these protests is Jair Bolsonaro, who would make Trump and Cruz look like progressive champions.
The investigations have been quite biased against the PT, with the 1000 leaks to the big media groups (who hate the PT) and almost not touching denounced PSDB politicians.
Lula can still be judged by the supreme court which has already sent some of the historic PT leaders to jail in the Mensalao scandal. So he does not have the same immunity as a congressman. There is also a lot of ideological issues with some of the figures in the Lava jato case. Why do you go on about Marx and Hegel (meaning Engels) in a corruption case?
All in all, while Dilma's first government was weak (her second hasn't really started, since congress blocks everything), this is a classic right-wing response like there are every few decades in Latin American countries. There hadn't been one in Brazil since 64, so I guess it was time.
Lies, lies, lies, and more lies.
Everyone knows it, you know it, stop pushing it. This very thread has already categorically proven wrong every single statement you made regarding the demographics of the protests, its goals, the investigation process, and the role of the media in all of this.
This always makes me roll my eyes.
I know is ingrained in Brazilian culture to exaggerate everything, but trust me on this one, you are not even close to the awful mess that is Venezuela.
That is because the OP is over exaggerating a lotThis always makes me roll my eyes.
I know is ingrained in Brazilian culture to exaggerate everything, but trust me on this one, you are not even close to the awful mess that is Venezuela.
A squid fucking a carwash sounds exciting
It is a classical right wing protest since they can't take 15 years of left-wing government. It's full of people calling for a return of the military dictatorship, posters saying that Brasil must go back to being right-wing (endireita Brasil) and criticizing PT's supposed communism (which is bullshit). In interviews with protesters you also see a lot of attacks against any aid programs, with people calling poor people parasites or vagabundos (lazy bums).
It's funny you trying to refute OPs exaggerations and sweeping generalizations by making them yourself.
A squid fucking a carwash sounds exciting
Excuse me, but you clearly don't know what you're talking about,The situation is not like the OP express... well it is bad and of course there are a lot of shit happening but the OP is over exagerating a bit.
There are a lot of bias and class division in people opinions in Brasil too.
Dilma is not doing a good job too and that helps to complicate the situation.
The economic crisis is new for yungers but it is by fair the light economic crisis we had in the country... I have fear for worst economic crisis like we had in 1980-1990 decades.
Excuse me, but you clearly don't know what you're talking about,
"Brazil’s gross domestic product fell by a record 4.5 per cent year-on-year in the third quarter, confirming fears that Latin America’s largest country is on track for its worst recession since the Great Depression."
"Brazil’s economy shrank 3.8 per cent in 2015, putting what was once one of the world’s fastest-growing large emerging markets on track to suffer its worst recession since official records began."
https://next.ft.com/content/d2d7e33e-982c-11e5-bdda-9f13f99fa654
https://next.ft.com/content/57a3a1e8-e13e-11e5-8d9b-e88a2a889797
Sauce. Out of date, obv. Dilma should be lower by now.
The problem with trying to focus solely on one stat is that you then end up with results like this:
Sauce. Out of date, obv. Dilma should be lower by now.
now, does anyone actually think that Sarney was the second best thing to ever happen to this country's economy?