The campaign is always garbage and boring so this is good news.
The game is designed from the ground up for next gen. They are supporting 128 players in one map. There is full scale destruction. Lots of new features.Yet we only get 7 maps? You'd think with no campaign they could spend that effort on giving us more content but this just seems like we get less value.
Yes you can do that lol. Are you new here?Sorry, I come from a time when you could just buy your multiplayer focused game and be done with it.
Enjoy your live service GAAS.
Are you kidding? you'd rather have maps that only a fraction of the population has meaning long queues for maps that might still ultimately be shit. The problem is the developers not so dumb excuse like a battle pass.Why? Paid seasons are good. You get what you pay for. They did away with Paid DLC for BFV and Battlefront 2 and look at how poorly it was supported.
BF1 had paid DLC and they got 20 maps in just over 18 months after launch. BFV and Battlefront got maybe 5-6 maps.
You cannot expect developers to make 20 massive maps for free. That's not how things work. You get what you pay for.
I would rather pay for high quality maps than F2P shit that doesnt get supported. how many maps have Fortnite and CoD Warzone gotten?
What are you on about? Maps behind paywalls? No dev is doing that any more. The fuck?Are you kidding? you'd rather have maps that only a fraction of the population has meaning long queues for maps that might still ultimately be shit. The problem is the developers not so dumb excuse like a battle pass.
He was supporting pay walls for maps. You and are on the same page.What are you on about? Maps behind paywalls? No dev is doing that any more. The fuck?
The fact the maps are so massive is pure insanity. Like multiple battle royal maps.From Jacksfrags video..
7 multiplayer maps. Larger than anything in the series before. The largest map in Antarctica is about as large as some PUBG map named Vikendi.
Battle Pass is free and paid. Free has everything gameplay related, paid is cosmetics. Battle passes/seasons will 'progress the story'.
Two other game modes to be revealed later. Hazard Zone isn't a BR but will be perhaps something like Tarkov or Hunt: Showdown with tight squadplay. DICE LA working on a "love letter" to Battlefield fans.
From Jacksfrags video..
7 multiplayer maps. Larger than anything in the series before. The largest map in Antarctica is about as large as some PUBG map named Vikendi.
Battle Pass is free and paid. Free has everything gameplay related, paid is cosmetics. Battle passes/seasons will 'progress the story'.
Two other game modes to be revealed later. Hazard Zone isn't a BR but will be perhaps something like Tarkov or Hunt: Showdown with tight squadplay. DICE LA working on a "love letter" to Battlefield fans.
Then I bow my head in shame and sincerely request that you kindly accept my most humble of apologies, sir.He was supporting pay walls for maps. You and are on the same page.
Ok this is getting silly now.I don't care about Battlefield campaigns at all. But paid seasons on top of a full priced multiplayer game.
Get the fuck outta here!
read up instead of throwing in hot takes. the 'paid' seasons are only cosmetic. all operators, maps, gameplay etc, are free. I'm not sure what the problem is.I don't care about Battlefield campaigns at all. But paid seasons on top of a full priced multiplayer game.
Get the fuck outta here!
I really don't get the bs "info" regarding BF. So much false things spread around. People think they have to pay for maps. The title of OP is also misleading. Paid seasons, yes for cosmetics.What are you on about? Maps behind paywalls? No dev is doing that any more. The fuck?
Game should have no issues with population. it's not battle royale that needs to have new servers filled up right away. BF games have 30 minute rounds and matchmaking should put you straight into a server. This is how BF games have worked since the beginning of time.Are you kidding? you'd rather have maps that only a fraction of the population has meaning long queues for maps that might still ultimately be shit. The problem is the developers not so dumb excuse like a battle pass.
Ok let's be real, who play BF for the campaign ?
As for seasons, it's just another name for DLC's pack
Yep. They have sucked since BF3. We got 10 years of shit campaigns no one wanted to play. They were mocked and took resources away from the main game.The campaigns were always forgettable. And after the disaster that was BFV I would rather their full attention go into the multiplayer and not waste resources on a campaign that the majority of the player base won't even play anyway.
Oh my god. It's literally just how it's always been for the past few years with Battlefield.So is it f2p?
Not if your trying to find a full server under 50 ping especially one that rotates in DLC. Population splitting is always a problem in multiplayer games.Game should have no issues with population. it's not battle royale that needs to have new servers filled up right away. BF games have 30 minute rounds and matchmaking should put you straight into a server. This is how BF games have worked since the beginning of time.
Last gen was the same. PS4 and X1 got 64 player maps while PS360 players had to settle for 24 players. They didnt even have crossplay like we do nowadays. And that game came out at launch. This is coming out a year later when next gen consoles should be around 30 million users. Plus all the PC players.
And like I pointed out above, season pass, paid DLC maps are essential in making sure you get a regular stream of content. If you dont pay, the devs dont owe you anything and will not support it. Please go back and tell me how many maps Titanfall 2, BF2, and BFV got compared to BF1 and all COD games that have paid DLC.
You get what you pay for. Devs dont work for free.
Not if your trying to find a full server under 50 ping especially one that rotates in DLC. Population splitting is always a problem in multiplayer games.
I believe he said there is no BR period which is going to hurt the game.From Jacksfrags video..
7 multiplayer maps. Larger than anything in the series before. The largest map in Antarctica is about as large as some PUBG map named Vikendi.
Battle Pass is free and paid. Free has everything gameplay related, paid is cosmetics. Battle passes/seasons will 'progress the story'.
Two other game modes to be revealed later. Hazard Zone isn't a BR but will be perhaps something like Tarkov or Hunt: Showdown with tight squadplay. DICE LA working on a "love letter" to Battlefield fans.
I dont disagree with the last part. As someone who bought the season pass for BF1, I always said that they should be made free once the next batch of DLC maps arrive. This way the hardcore will fund it and get early access for a couple of months and still find games.Not if your trying to find a full server under 50 ping especially one that rotates in DLC. Population splitting is always a problem in multiplayer games.
Im not saying devs work for free, im saying to put out content worth buying other than maps or scrape the maps all together and just make the next sequel. Buying maps that you wont be able to play in a few months is stupid