Is there any decent DR. Who books out there?
Loads. It's a mixed bag though.
Does anybody else think that Peter Capaldi looks like Peter Cushing?
FRANK, i didn't know you visited whogaf?
It's true though, they can be hit and miss. Usually miss for me.
Who people forget also played Doctor Who.
Who people forget also played Doctor Who.
I used to be in a Doctor Who fan club that met every week in a hotel in Edinburgh. And this was during Peter Davison era. You kids today don't know you're born.
I think the root of the problem is that there was just no way they could properly convey the scope of horror and destruction that's implied by something like the Time War "burning the universe across all time and space" in a family-friendly format. They really didn't even try.That's one thing that stops me from completely loving the 50th. As charming as Hurt was, his performance was completely not appropriate for the character he was supposed to represent: The doctor who literally committed suicide to become a warrior who fought for who knows how long during the Time War before he declared No More!.
Take the entire script and all of the scenes you remember from the 50th and insert the angry Eccleston from the beginning of the 9th in place of Hurt and you'd have one epic special.
Why would that make any difference? It's not like the script was calling for an angry doctor and Hurt decided to ignore it and do his own thing.
So did the show basically retcon the Doctor's final death/grave at Trenzalore within 3 episodes? Or is he going to end up caught in an even bigger battle there sometime in his future? Or was that maybe already changed within the Name of the Doctor episode by what Clara did? What's the general consensus?
Cause I was killing people and things and seeing horrors for hundreds of years and was then about to commit genocide on two races (one of which was my own), I wouldn't be so jolly.
Also, the feelings/behavior/memories of the 9th doctor should be a continuation from the "War Doctor." Yeah I get that each doctor behaves in his own way, etc., but clearly #9 was traumatized by the actions of the War Doctor, but the War Doctor wasn't?
What I meant was, if Moffat wanted Hurt to be angry like Nine was, he would have written the War Doctor as an angrier character. Slotting Eccleston into that role wouldn't make a difference if that wasn't what Moffat was going for.
Cause I was killing people and things and seeing horrors for hundreds of years and was then about to commit genocide on two races (one of which was my own), I wouldn't be so jolly.
Also, the feelings/behavior/memories of the 9th doctor should be a continuation from the "War Doctor." Yeah I get that each doctor behaves in his own way, etc., but clearly #9 was traumatized by the actions of the War Doctor, but the War Doctor wasn't?
Not all of us. I don't think so. It might just be thatMoffat got lazy and started writing his female characters all the same. There's too many inconsistencies for her to be River regenerated. Especially since it would have to be before the River Song we know since she can't regenerate anymore. And she's dead. Kind of.
I accidentally wrote 'all of us' in my post so I'm fixing it now.
Eh well whatevs, the final scenes with 11 are the saddest I've been since 9 and 10's regeneration T^T
How many months til I can see Capallidi's awesomeness as The Doctor?
August/September, though there's a rumor that they may try to get the first episode out as an Easter special. No idea how credible that is though.
Such a boring episode. The whole Christmas town story just felt so awkwardly put together.
wiki it, it's one of the most interesting and disgusting parts of doctor who lore
from what i remember the timelords were made infertile due to reasons i forget, so they devised a machine called the loom that would take genetic material and create a timelord within it, there's quite a gruesome description in one of the seventh doctor novels i think where the doctor recounts being entirely conscious while being loomed, literally slowly being 'built' from genetic material
I can see it being played angrier like you preferred, but I think it also works the way they did it. The whole point is that he isn't yet the man who committed the genocide of two races, he's the man contemplating that act. He's beaten down by his own failures and what they've driven him to consider. He's in a state of grief, plenty of time for anger later.and what I meant was, I closed my eyes and imagined if Eccleston literally read the same lines as Hurt did as the angry-9th doctor. It puts things in an entirely different light:
- The monologue when he was bringing the Moment to the cabin would have been far more substantial with Eccleston. He had plenty of such lecturing examples during his tenure. Hurt's version was more of a reading ...
- The way he shooes the Moment from the cabin before he realizes who she is ala 9th shooes Rose early on
- The "you're me?" moment would have worked better because Eccleston was nothing like Tennant and Smith in terms of behavior. The contrast would have been a lot more believable. Hurt was too much like a jolly old doctor.
p.s., since I'm American and had never heard of Hurt before the special, I'm probably being more critical of his performance than most
I hope so. Doctor Who is the reason for every season.August/September, though there's a rumor that they may try to get the first episode out as an Easter special. No idea how credible that is though.
I am digging Capallidi's crazy eyes.
At the very least he is going to be awesome at looking at people and things
So nobody agrees?It would be cool if Doctor Jenny was brought back into the show, but have her regenerate into a young child in order to have the show be about the adventures of a father and their child for a few series.
So nobody agrees?
So nobody agrees?
It could be a teenager than.If there is one thing I hate more than children it's children.
Well it won't be a normal child, but a couple hundred year old Time Lord that happens to look like a child.It's almost impossible to have a strongly-written child part.
You know, as much as there's been some justifiable complaining about Clara's character I think seeing her interaction with Capaldi is one of the things I'm most looking forward to next year.
It's almost like setting the writers a challenge of not just having her give the Doctor doe eyes and having the Doctor respond with a hug. Capaldi doesn't seem like a hugger. In some ways that introductory episode will not only have to prove why they cast Capaldi (which shouldn't be too hard) but also has to show why his particular Doctor would keep Clara around. And just seeing the two of them together should be quite sweet. I can see her taking more of an Ace role with a student-teacher vibe.
It's actually fascinating how a cross-Doctor companion subtly changes their own character to match the Doctor. I think that's probably why a lot of people, myself included, find S1 Rose fine and S2 Rose near insufferable.
If there is one thing I hate more than children it's children.
He was lying.Wait, so did they retcon that line in SJA where 11th says he can regenerate as many times as he wants?
Wait, so did they retcon that line in SJA where 11th says he can regenerate as many times as he wants?
Even in Series 2, Rose is alright early on. The shift for her comes after Mickey is gone - from The Idiots Lantern on they're overconfident, rude, borderline flippant about the gift the TARDIS gives them, and insufferable. They were on their way to that as early as Boom Town - where they end up is the natural conclusion of their "and off we go! Adventures in Time! Woo! And Space!" in that episode, where they're high fiving and dancing around the TARDIS - all three of them - and Mickey goes, "My god, have you seen yourselves?"
That's all by design, of course. I guess that had been set in stone early on; they wanted a prettier Doctor, they wanted it to become a love affair and then rip them apart painfully, and the groundwork to begin that was in place a few stories before the change to Tennant, really.
I mention this as I'm really curious where the Clara stuff will go, as she's been if anything more familiar and girlfriend-y in the last two episodes (there's something bizarrely close about that final scene with him in Day of the Doctor for instance), but I wonder if that'll continue or be sharply dropped, with Moffat only doing it to squeeze that particular lemon dry before Matt went?
i think some of it is but i can't remember whatWhoa. But technically this isn't official canon?
well depending on what parts of the canon you subscribe to, there may not have been any sex involved at all, and the doctor's family were born from the nightmarish looms instead like the doctor himself
So I believe we're of the assumption thatTasha is a regeneration of River Song?
p.s., since I'm American and had never heard of Hurt before the special, I'm probably being more critical of his performance than most
I'm not sure if you noticed, but he put the token amount of effort necessary to address that and move past it as quickly as possible to stop people going on about it. Him thinking it was shit fits perfectly with how it was dealt with in Time of the Doctor.
oh fucksakes, forgot about thatThankfully the show pissed the idea of looms off when it showed a young Master in series 3.
Thankfully the show pissed the idea of looms off when it showed a young Master in series 3.
Just read a cute and somewhat interesting YouTube comment about The Doctor and his accents.
10th 'picking' his accent after his time with Rose, 11th for the same reason, and now the 12th for his time with Amy. Can't think how to explain 9, but yeah, it's still cool.