I don't even...
If you think RTD's run was somehow head and shoulders above Moffat's, you are remembering RTD's run incorrectly.
I don't even...
Also she didn't age in 300+ years.
Might have to check that out, I'm warming alot up to Hartnell.More classic Who talk!
Just finished up The Rescue. It was the first episode I came across that was just a two parter, but I really liked it for it (nice to have only one quickly introduced and equally quickly dismissed cliffhanger in a First Doctor episode). The solution to the problem is very transient, and like many episodes in the First Doctor tenure the Doctor and co feel like transient bypassers/observers rather than key to the solution.
I've got the Romans coming up next thanks to the nice DVD combo box.
And yet the doctor did because reasons!
I do. Not to restate APZonerunner's so eloquently put post but the key difference that I see between the two era's is that RTD's is lighter while Moffats so much thicker with drama. What this seems to result in is that RTD's era is much more re-watch friendly while Moffat's is much harder to rewatch because now that you know the drama that's coming it feels heavier and harder to watch.
I don't know about that, I did a Matt rewatch earlier in the month and expected it to last me until Christmas, but I ended up burning through them in two weeks!
Maybe I'm just too emotionally invested in The Ponds.![]()
Also she didn't age in 300+ years.
I'm more concerned about that Barnable kid not aging much at all too. He went from kid to adult but in that time it looked like the Doctor aged extremely fast.
I'm more concerned about that Barnable kid not aging much at all too. He went from kid to adult but in that time it looked like the Doctor aged extremely fast.
To be honest, I doubt that Moffat is very concerned with Time Lord aging or even how old the Doctor actually is. I'm pretty sure he's been inconsistent about it in his own run. In DOTD that line where 11 admits that he's not even sure if he's lying about his age is a bit of a Lampshade Hang.He had spent something like 800 years in the same body.. I'd expect him to age. War Doctor also appeared to have aged during the Time War. When 8 changes to War in Night of the Doctor we see a reflection of what looks like a younger Hurt than what we saw in Day of the Doctor.
That wasn't Barnable, it was someone new. The Doctor's an old man and didn't realize/forgot that Barnable died centuries ago.
Barnable was the kid, not the adult.
The Doctor, in his old age, thought he was Barnable, but he tells the Doctor he isn't.
To be honest, I doubt that Moffat is very concerned with Time Lord aging or even how old the Doctor actually is. I'm pretty sure he's been inconsistent about it in his own run. In DOTD that line where 11 admits that he's not even sure if he's lying about his age is a bit of a Lampshade Hang.
He aged because the narrative called for it.
According to GB rumors this Christmas special was supposed to happen in 2014 if Matt Smith didn't leave. He was supposed to be searching for Gallifrey throughout series 8. That is why the Day of the Doctor had him saying he was going to be searching for it as his new destination, and then suddenly it is like "Bam! Found it."
And yet the doctor did because reasons!
Thanks!I believe Clara's theme is called A Letter To Clara
No because it was all part of the same arc. And now the arc is over.Anyone else think that episode titles in the style "[x] of the Doctor" are a bit naff and overused?
Anyone else think that episode titles in the style "[x] of the Doctor" are a bit naff and overused?
They did three of them.
One for the season finale, one for the anniversary, and one for the Christmas special.
So no.
Anyone else think that episode titles in the style "[x] of the Doctor" are a bit naff and overused?
Well, I rather did like how they tied together all of Moffat's run.
But they never really explained nor answered the Question. Instead, we get yet another shitty deus ex machina that makes utterly zero sense and turns what is an epic and fresh idea into a pile of coal.
Anyone else think that episode titles in the style "[x] of the Doctor" are a bit naff and overused?
Anyone else think that episode titles in the style "[x] of the Doctor" are a bit naff and overused?
Honestly, this episode just summed up Matt Smith's stint as the Doctor for me. Messy, no sense of danger, a poor plot disguised by a convoluted narrative structure... I just didn't really like it at all.
IMO they put too much shit (weeping angels, clara's family) into the Christmas Special and they had no time to develop the main story. It was pretty sad still - sad to see Matt go and the new doctor had ike 30 seconds!
I know it's been said before, but Clara is such a non-character. The doctor could have done everything on his own (and did) and the episode would've been better for it. It seems like Moffat was told to have a young, hot female companion and he has absolutely no enthusiasm to write another role like that when he already had Amy Pond to fulfil that role.
It's been established that regen energy has the potential to destroy (End of Time) so to hold in one's death until the very last second, I can see it being something bombastic. 9 just died so it wasn't a big bang, 10 held his death in until he said bye to everyone, and he exploded the TARDIS, 11 held it in for hundreds of years.
And they didn't even introduce the family members! Was that really Clara's dad? He's not played by the same actor as in Rings of Akhaten. And who is that blonde woman with him? Credits say "Linda", but we don't know if she is his new wife, girlfriend, sister, cousin or anything.
Well, it doesn't tally entirely. The reason it's so explosive in The End of Time is actually due to his body ejecting the dangerous radiation he'd absorbed in the booth. It reacts with the regeneration energy, like gas and an open flame, and when it's expelled from his body it causes explosions and fire. That's RTD's explanation from one of the annuals, so while it was never in the show it is straight from the source in a BBC-sanctioned/published book..
Well, he can choose to "use" regeneration energy in different ways can't he? He can use it to regrow himself (Christmas Invasion), give life to others (Angels Take Manhattan). In Parting of the Ways, he just has no cause to use it destructively. But yeah, radiation/new life.
And I think speaking of regeneration it's very clear the regeneration limit was a very recent idea in Moffatt's mind, if we take into account Eccleston originally intended for the 50th over the War Doctor and the various references to regeneration in Smith's run (Let's Kill Hitler, Impossible Astronaut, Angels Take Manhattan).
Wait, Eccleston was supposed to be regen #50?
Tasha Lem was in the Papal Mainframe, with God knows what amount of impossible futuristic tech to keep her young. The Doctor was in a pokey little village intentionally devoid of technology carving toys for children for nearly a millenium. I see no problem with this.
I'd like to know when the Time Lords make their call, weren't they suppose to be frozen in a moment of time after ala the pictures? Besides that, Rassilion was in charge and the rest of the council had agreed with his crazy ass plan to basically end everything to evolve. If these people were in charge still doubt they'd be going the path they are let alone send him a new regeneration cycle.
I wonder if we're ever going to hear anything about the Valeyard again. If he shows up again, you'd expect him to turn up near the beginning of Capaldi's run, because he's supposed to be created when Smith regenerated into Capaldi. He'd make for an interesting main villain for his first series.
Of course, Big Finish is also releasing 'Trial of the Valeyard' in december 2014, a 6th Doctor story which is supposed to reveal exactly who or what the Valeyard is (with some early reviews hinting that he might not be a version of the Doctor at all). Whatever that reveal will be, it'd be weird for the BBC to allow Big Finish to release a big reveal story like that if they're also going to touch on the subject in the tv show.
Edit: Looking at the Big Finish site, apparently it's aleady released as a bonus for customers who bought one of the subscriptions this year. It'll be on sale for the rest of us in december 2014. Perhaps someone here already listened to it and can tell us if they really reveal something and if it does something with the Smith/Capaldi-era of the show.
I wonder if we're ever going to hear anything about the Valeyard again. If he shows up again, you'd expect him to turn up near the beginning of Capaldi's run, because he's supposed to be created when Smith regenerated into Capaldi. He'd make for an interesting main villain for his first series.
It's an irrelevant plot stand now, though. The time when they could've used it has passed.
I rather like this little thing, though - the regeneration between penultimate (Tennant) and last (Smith) is - if you think about it - the meta-crisis Doctor, who commits genocide, something even the War Doctor didn't in fact do - so he isn't exactly all above board and all that. He's your Valeyard. I guess. History changed.