Didn't say any of those things. You've made it clear you're sexually into school aged girls, though. So that's weird.
And so a new witch hunt begins.
There's no projecting. Pete's post defending sexualizing schoolgirls said they are "peak female performance". His words. I firmly believe anyone openly saying things like this need to be on an FBI watchlist.
FBI watchlist he says...
Listen guy, I understand that the internet is where people go to vent and unload their frustrations. But what people constantly accuse others of often says more about them than it does about their targets.
You're being so absurdly pretentious and holier-than-thou that you've ended up in the same camp as the weirdos who claimed Pragmata was a paedo game because Diana wasn't... wearing shoes. Yes, seriously.
Also, she had long hair, which -apparently - in that "pedo signal" conspiracy logic is meant to be some kind of coded hint. It's genuinely absurd AND worrying...
At a certain point, you start wondering how people's brains got reduced to this kind of mush.
And to make it even more obvious: do you really think a multimillion-dollar company would deliberately use a
minor as a sexual object? This isn't some obscure Steam title buried in the back of the store, this is a mainstream product designed to sell to the masses. The idea falls apart under even basic scrutiny.
The problem is that you've become so fixated on finding internet brain rot everywhere that you've started seeing it even when it isn't there. Not every conversation, character, or creative decision is evidence of some deeper societal sickness.
If the only thing you ever see is internet brain rot, then maybe the problem isn't everyone else. Maybe it's the people who have trained themselves to view everything through that lens.