asdasdasdbb
Member
I don't think it will happen but it would be nice if NV shrinked it to N4P at least.
Yeah... I was holding out for a 5080 Ti. Alas, here we sit.
![]()
and multi-frame gen. also.. 12% on a 200 fps game like COD makes your game from locked 240 to your monitor to 215... just saying lol. 12% isnt nothing. Not to mention DLSS5 is 5000 exclusive
I think the 5080 24 GB is the perfect card to replace the 4090.
has the same amount of VRAM. a 15% less powerful, but has multi-frame gen, DLSS5 support, DisplayPort 2.0 or 2.1, forgot compared to 1.4 on the 4090, and... much cheaper than 4090 in the marketplace
With that being said, because it's 24 GB, i think this card will be sold very quickly and will have the same drama in the used market where people scam others by selling a GPU without core and VRAM.
as for DX3, i think all nvidia cards from 4000 and above will be fine
If i knew situations would have been like this, i wouldnt have sold my 4090. fine wine at its best for 2 generations.
for single player games i do count them as such. considering i play with a controller I dont feel the input lag to a point where its bad experience.You can't really count fake frames as performance improvement...
for single player games i do count them as such. considering i play with a controller I dont feel the input lag to a point where its bad experience.
in competitve multiplayer games? of course not.
but seeing 240 frames locked on FH6 and other games, yeah ill take it.
If you aren't enabling all the bells and whistles? Sure.RTX 20 series Aged like Fine Brandy bro.
If you aren't enabling all the bells and whistles? Sure.
But the RTX 20 wasn't that much of an uplift from RTX 10. It's why Jenson told everyone it's safe to upgrade when they did the RTX 30 announcement. The 3080 was a great price and big uplift from the 2080 which barely moved the needle from the 1080/1080ti.
if i remember correctly, you also have a 4090 no ?Yeah, I guess it could be an argument for users of 240-360+ Hz monitors, for regular 120Hz users (I have 4k tv) 2x frame gen is pretty much all that is needed.
I am talking about that.2018 GPU still supports all modern day features (and will do it for the next few years), I bet he was talking about that.
Supports and run well are two very different things. My 12GB 3080ti was struggling with some game at 3440x1440. I'm now on a 5070ti at 4K and it's a big difference.2018 GPU still supports all modern day features (and will do it for the next few years), I bet he was talking about that.
2080Ti with 11GB VRAM is still a very decent GPU.
I am talking about that.
DLSS SR has done wonders for increasing the life span of a GPU.
Just imagine how badly older GPUs would have gamed with no DLSS.
It's perception. It's because it was the flagship and "only" 699$.Everyone brags about the godly 1080/ti lasting for a 8+ years at 1080p but the truth is, the lowly 3060 will probably go 10+ years.
Yea. TSMC 4N is custom TSMC N5 lol.I don't think it will happen but it would be nice if NV shrinked it to N4P at least.
if i remember correctly, you also have a 4090 no ?
that card is perfect. for 4k 120 TV is more than overkill for many gmaes too. honestly as i said, if I knew things would turn out this way, i wouldnt have sold my 4090. I had it for 1600$ Canadian ( 1200 US ? ) used for the FE.
with that being said, few months later everything started going up in price and i ended up selling for good profit towards the 5090 ( i think i made around 900$ canadian profit lol )
24 gb of vram in a 5070 ti super? Sounds too good to be true.
Supports and run well are two very different things. My 12GB 3080ti was struggling with some game at 3440x1440. I'm now on a 5070ti at 4K and it's a big difference.
The RTX 20 cards were meant to do raytracing. But they were dogs at it. It wasn't until RTX 30 that it was a usable feature.
I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but you're either outright trolling us or you're Jensen's burner account lol.Even when Jensen is outright committing an act of philanthropy you still slander the guy. PC Gamers don't deserve GeForce.
I fail to see how taking LPDDR5X from Racks (which limits long context due to KVCache) to give gamers a few more GBs is revenue or earnings positive. So yea he's doing it for PR.I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but you're either outright trolling us or you're Jensen's burner account lol.
I instantly knew not to give him the benefit of a doubt. And he's most likely not trolling which is even worse cause some Nvidia defenders are indeed that delusional and crazy.I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but you're either outright trolling us or you're Jensen's burner account lol.