Reizo Ryuu
Member
They look like the original promotional images/boxart, so in a sense they finally look like they were always supposed to.
I'm fucking crying.It could be worse.
![]()
![]()
yea it looks great
Wow, when you put them side by side, the Mario Galaxy one looks more like someone's "Fursona" than Starfox. Sorry haters, this is the best Starfox since since N64.Nintendo should have used the Starfox model from the Super Mario Galaxy movie. That one is perfect. The 3D model for the game looks terrible, like a creepy stuffed animal.
![]()
Or youtubers who post "We need to talk about", "this broke me" or the worst "This changes everything" accompanied by an exaggerated surprise expression pic to themselves not the thumbnail.Yeah outrage culture still at an all time high. Everything is either the next best thing or the worst thing ever. It's exhausting.
The movie one looks exactly like I would expect the cartoon version of the one on the right to look like.Wow, when you put them side by side, the Mario Galaxy one looks more like someone's "Fursona" than Starfox. Sorry haters, this is the best Starfox since since N64.
Its definitely got a Fortnite vibe to it.The movie one looks exactly like I would expect the cartoon version of the one on the right to look like.
Nintendo fans will look at this image and go "fuck yea, that's my main character"
![]()
if it looked like this I would like it but it doesn't. Falco's beak is too small and their legs look weird (it was way better with humanoid legs). Also, Slippy looks like he's on DSSL 5 filter on some shots, which sucks.It looks like this
![]()
so i like it.
Nah, the Mario Galaxy version looks cuter, but the remake Fox is the real deal that's not fucking around.Nintendo should have used the Starfox model from the Super Mario Galaxy movie. That one is perfect. The 3D model for the game looks terrible, like a creepy stuffed animal.
![]()
I think Falco's chicken legs are the bigger problem, it's a shame they didn't go with that one theory that was floating around for a while that the metallic looking knee high boots they all wore were actually artificial legs and all the characters got their legs amputated at the knees to help not pass out from G force.
You're going to see this Fox for like 3 minutes in the prologue, then the rest of the game is the son with his dead eyes staring through your soul every time he looks at the camera.![]()
yea it looks great
I meant it's the same "puppet" style.if it looked like this I would like it but it doesn't. Falco's beak is too small and their legs look weird (it was way better with humanoid legs). Also, Slippy looks like he's on DSSL 5 filter on some shots, which sucks.
Or... bear with me here... they simple liked it. I know, crazy, right?Most people saying yes are in the "who gives a fox" category because the overarching narrative or appeal of the series doesnt really mean much to them. Its "new" to them since most only know him from smash or that awful movie and its weird look is interesting to them.
I have to sincerely doubt you played it at release if you were complaining about fucking game length in 1993.it looks great, now also fix the gameplay and I'm interested.
I remember playing the original when it released and even at that time it was already boring as fuck. A 3 hour long on rails shooter for 150 bucks (at the time) was just crazy shit.
They should've properly remade the game with free flight.
now i want a dark and twisted star fox