Games are already $100, you pay $60 for the standard edition with no DLC.$1000 console, and $100 games please. I've been paying 60bux for games since I was a kid, it's time we give more back. Gaming is a rich mans hobby, Poors should "git gud" at the game of life instead.
I can think of two editions. $100 for the "you own it" version, and the $0 "you don't".Games are already $100, you pay $60 for the standard edition with no DLC.
The reason it may costs $1,200- $1,300 is because there is enough people like you who are will to pay $1,200- $1,300, nothing to do with cramming as much shit into a box as possible.Oddly, I'm hoping for it to cost a little more, maybe $1,200- $1,300. I'm in the minority, but I want as much shit crammed into this hybrid PC as possible. Referring specifically to Helix, of course.
Also, I'm working under the assumption that the margin would be staying consistent from the alleged $1,000 price and the prices that I suggested. I don't expect this to be a popular opinion, and I get that.
I thought they were talking at one point about having OEMs like Asus build on Helix platform with MS hardware being "demonstration" device so to speak. Kind of like Nvidia FE cards.Microsoft confirmed a while back that it's just one device.
Edit: Which makes sense as we've only ever heard about one.
Yes, they're not that out of touch with casual players. 1k would be too much for many.
$599 ramlessPS6:
599 discless
699 with discdrive
PS6P
499
People hoping new Sony CEO and CFO bean counters are going to do a $200-300 subsidy like the PS3 days. lolThey're going to offer the PS6 for nearly the same price as the PS5 a year and a half from now?
Is the RAM going to be DLC?
Microsoft confirmed a while back that it's just one device.
Edit: Which makes sense as we've only ever heard about one.
Sorry, edited it in above.
news.xbox.com
This week, Xbox announced it is actively building its next-generation lineup across console, handheld, PC, cloud, and accessories. As part of this, Xbox unveiled that it has entered into a strategic, multi-year partnership with AMD to co-engineer silicon across a portfolio of devices, including future first-party consoles and cloud.
In addition, Microsoft and AMD are developing silicon not just for one product, but also for other hardware, including handhelds. "The same technologies that we're introducing will also show up in AMD's discrete GPU roadmap and the same chips that power the cloud," he said. "Because ultimately what we are trying to do is we're trying to provide one common platform for game developers," making it easy to optimize titles for a wide range of devices.
Most of the recent development work has been with AMD, who has co-designed the system-on-a-chip (SOC) components at the heart of Xbox consoles, but also its competitors. The goal now is to design a family of silicon that can work across a family of devices, Ronald said, where consumers "have confidence in games" and that "they will run on a wide diversity of devices."
www.notebookcheck.net
Jez has learned from his sources that Microsoft is working with third-party OEMs to develop more affordable offerings that deliver a similar experience at lower prices. Apparently, some third-party offerings could be even more powerful than the next Xbox.
I mean, you could completely ignore my qualifier but that would be pretty dumb. Oh wait....The reason it may costs $1,200- $1,300 is because there is enough people like you who are will to pay $1,200- $1,300, nothing to do with cramming as much shit into a box as possible.
They'll have a 800-900 BOM box and come up with all the excuses in the world for it to retail $1,300 (AI, tariffs, etc) and you'll believe it and buy it at that price.
Maybe Project Helix is referring to MS's machine only, excluding 3rd party devices?So Project Scarlett was revealed in June 2019 and the existence of Series S was not leaked until September 2020, 6-7 weeks before Series Consoles launch in November 2020.
MS has reiterated multiple times that they are building an entire portfolio of devices, and Jez has stated the OEMs will be doing both the cheaper and more powerful devices.
![]()
Xbox and AMD: Advancing the Next Generation of Gaming Together - Xbox Wire
This week, Xbox announced it is actively building its next-generation lineup across console, handheld, PC, cloud, and accessories. Find out more inside.news.xbox.com
![]()
Microsoft: First Prototype Kits for Next-Gen Xbox Ship in 2027
At GDC, Xbox VP Jason Ronald lays out the company's vision for the future of Microsoft's console.tech.yahoo.com
![]()
Microsoft outs Xbox Project Helix: 'We want to break down the artificial barriers between PC and console'
Microsoft committed to shipping its next-gen console to developers in 2027, and listed several of its features. They should look familiar to PC gamers.www.pcworld.com
![]()
Next-gen Xbox console could be joined by even more powerful “super-premium”partner offerings
Windows Central says the next Xbox console will essentially double-up as a fully-functional Windows machine. Alongside Microsoft’s console, third-party OEMs will work on delivering a similar experience across all price segments.www.notebookcheck.net
So Jason Ronald stated at GDC on March 11 that they're doing a family of Silicon for a family of devices. Jez has stated OEMs will be doing the cheaper and the more expensive super premium variants.
We already know of the Magnus CPU SOC that can be paired up with any of the 5 RDNA5 GPU dies. Helix premium console is only Magnus AT2. They could easily do Magnus AT3, and Magnus AT4 for cheaper consoles with 48 and 24 CUs respectively. And the much more powerful Magnus AT1 or AT0 Xbox PCs.
The unified GDK Helix SKU of games will scale hardware at any power level, so there are definitely going to be multiple devices at various power levels and price points.
I am expecting $599, $899, $1199 SKUs for Helix Consoles. 24, 48, 68 CUs.
Helix Handhelds will be either 12/24 CU SKUs or 16/24 CU SKUs. $599 and $999.
Xbox PCs with 96 CUs or up to 144 CUs would go beyond $2k.
Helix midrange with Magnus AT3 with 48 CUs would be comparable in performance to PS6 Orion with 52 CUs at $799.
Maybe Project Helix is referring to MS's machine only, excluding 3rd party devices?
Either that or Asha has since made a few changes behind the scenes.
If u can't spend a £1000 on a new console every 7 years you're on benefits, shit job or you're wife's got U on a leash.If they both launch at $1,000 then the console market will 100% die.
It would be a catastrophically stupid decision to price themselves out of the console space. If 3/4 of your current userbase cannot afford your next machine, what is the incentive for developers and publishers to support your next machine? There goes billions of dollars in subscription revenue, billions in software sales, billions in 3rd-party revenue, and billions in accesory sales.
Although they're not 1-to-1, phones never priced themselves out of the mobile space. Even when Apple and Samsung jumped to having $1K+ phones, they still had lower-priced variants of their devices. This is the correct way to deal with short-sighted profit-driven leadership; you make both a premium and a non-premium device and call it a day.
It's cute that you think more expensive means they are going to put anything extra in it.Oddly, I'm hoping for it to cost a little more, maybe $1,200- $1,300. I'm in the minority, but I want as much shit crammed into this hybrid PC as possible. Referring specifically to Helix, of course.
Also, I'm working under the assumption that the margin would be staying consistent from the alleged $1,000 price and the prices that I suggested. I don't expect this to be a popular opinion, and I get that.
Edit: at least one person is having trouble with this, so I'll explain. I gave an idealized scenario. This in know way is a prediction of how the margin will indeed be determined. Luckily for us, the Helix will not release in a vacuum. We will have the PS6, with a SoC that is also designed by AMD, so some price per performance comparisons will be able to be performed.
If u can't spend a £1000 on a new console every 7 years you're on benefits, shit job or you're wife's got U on a leash.
Can is not the same as want to. Even if I can spend $1000 on a smartphone I don't want to do that. There's always the cost/benefit calculation. People may have a lot of other hobbies they'd rather spend that extra cash on. But sure, if you don't have a life outside of gaming and you crave console "high-end" graphics then it makes sense to not care about the cost.If u can't spend a £1000 on a new console every 7 years you're on benefits, shit job or you're wife's got U on a leash.
They also subsidize trade ins. If I want a new Samsung Galaxy they give a $800 to 900 trade in if I keep my contract. That means paying off $400 in 3 years. These consoles ofder none of that.If they both launch at $1,000 then the console market will 100% die.
It would be a catastrophically stupid decision to price themselves out of the console space. If 3/4 of your current userbase cannot afford your next machine, what is the incentive for developers and publishers to support your next machine? There goes billions of dollars in subscription revenue, billions in software sales, billions in 3rd-party revenue, and billions in accesory sales.
Although they're not 1-to-1, phones never priced themselves out of the mobile space. Even when Apple and Samsung jumped to having $1K+ phones, they still had lower-priced variants of their devices. This is the correct way to deal with short-sighted profit-driven leadership; you make both a premium and a non-premium device and call it a day.
You have to compare to what pc part will be available end of 2027 and later in 2028, probably rtx 6xxx series. Consoles are doomed when they are close to 1k $ price region.If a console costs $1000..... how much do you think building an equivalent-specced PC would cost? Or even worse to build a PC that is more powerful?
I get the whole "do whatever you want" thing people say, but the primary reason to have a powerful PC, if not for work, is for gaming.
Hell, case in point, a PS6 has a GPU that is rumoured to be on par with a 5070ti. That GPU on its own costs around a $1000. Even if the PS6 GPu is 20% weaker than that, thats still $1000 for just an equivalent GPU vs spending a $1000 for an entire system. (not that I believe the PS6 will cost $1000, but just making a point). If consoles can cost $1000 and still be sold at a loss? Then wait till you all see how much PC components would cost around that time.
Do you see the economy right now, moron?If u can't spend a £1000 on a new console every 7 years you're on benefits, shit job or you're wife's got U on a leash.
The comparison time frame makes sense; however, I believe nothing changes.You have to compare to what pc part will be available end of 2027 and later in 2028, probably rtx 6xxx series. Consoles are doomed when they are close to 1k $ price region.
Jason Ronald famously said the XSS was designed to have the exact same experience as the XSX just at a lower resolution.The goal now is to design a family of silicon that can work across a family of devices, Ronald said, where consumers "have confidence in games" and that "they will run on a wide diversity of devices."
I find it cute when someone can't wrap their head around what an idealized scenario is. Especially when I basically spelled it out.It's cute that you think more expensive means they are going to put anything extra in it.
If they both launch at $1,000 then the console market will 100% die.
It would be a catastrophically stupid decision to price themselves out of the console space. If 3/4 of your current userbase cannot afford your next machine, what is the incentive for developers and publishers to support your next machine? There goes billions of dollars in subscription revenue, billions in software sales, billions in 3rd-party revenue, and billions in accesory sales.
Although they're not 1-to-1, phones never priced themselves out of the mobile space. Even when Apple and Samsung jumped to having $1K+ phones, they still had lower-priced variants of their devices. This is the correct way to deal with short-sighted profit-driven leadership; you make both a premium and a non-premium device and call it a day.
You posted a pic of a display model for sale. Reg price is a bit higher. That being said, there are some people that prefer consoles.Just saw a 5070 build for $1400 at costco. Why would anyone want these machines for $1,000 plus? I'm a Sony dickrider and former Xbox rat and i will buy one of the two at launch most likely but for any sane person why not just get a prebuilt?
![]()
It's going to be the PS6 lite. Without the screen, battery and buttons. $499"We have a product for those who can't spend $/€/£/¥ for premium consoles and it's called PS5/XSX".
With all due respect... your own photo says DISPLAY ONLY, WAS 1899.99.Just saw a 5070 build for $1400 at costco. Why would anyone want these machines for $1,000 plus? I'm a Sony dickrider and former Xbox rat and i will buy one of the two at launch most likely but for any sane person why not just get a prebuilt?
![]()
Sarah Bond...no longer with organizationMaybe Project Helix is referring to MS's machine only, excluding 3rd party devices?
Either that or Asha has since made a few changes behind the scenes.
With all due respect... your own photo says DISPLAY ONLY, WAS 1899.99.
So, regular price is US$ 1900.
You posted a pic of a display model for sale. Reg price is a bit higher. That being said, there are some people that prefer consoles.![]()
Nope, they Just want to enforce the change of hw consumption. They want people renting on cloud.I..I don't know.
Inflation and rising cost of living is resulting in a lot of trouble in the economy these days.
It's one of the primary reasons restaurants had to adapt and bring back value menus somehow. You reach a point where people just stop buying your stuff. It either isn't worth it or they can't afford it.
$1000 entry points for consoles to me feels like it would be an almost automatic industry crash.
You understand the visual quality of Xbox streaming is garbage compared to PS Cloud and other cloud providers? Big talk by Nutella about Azure doesnt actually amount to better performance for gaming.Nope, they Just want to enforce the change of hw consumption. They want people renting on cloud.
I just don't know how Sony will do that since they don't have a properly cloud infrastructure.
Next gen MS has everything favouring them with Xbox cloud ready.
The same way you CAN hve a second hand video game (or , in this case, a display only videogame), i dont'understand your point. If you have to compare a brand new video game with a NOT brand new PC, your comparison is biased, evidently.So what's your point? You CAN get a 5070 prebuilt for $1400. I don't even have a Costco around me, this was from Reddit.
The same way you CAN hve a second hand video game (or , in this case, a display only videogame), i dont'understand your point. If you have to compare a brand new video game with a NOT brand new PC, your comparison is biased, evidently.
Sony service can't even play ps5 games without properly ps hardware. It is a joke, Just old shit ps4 and ps3 games.You understand the visual quality of Xbox streaming is garbage compared to PS Cloud and other cloud providers? Big talk by Nutella about Azure doesnt actually amount to better performance for gaming.
You are telling someone that instead of buying a potentially $1000 console, they could buy a $1400 PC... that would be weaker than said consoles, mind you, and that they can get at that price if they are lucky.I don't even have a gaming PC anymore lmfao. I have a PS5 pro, switch 2 and that's it but go on. Just talking sense.
Or they'll do what perhaps makes more sense economically, start gaming on GeForce now instead.You are telling someone that instead of buying a potentially $1000 console, they could buy a $1400 PC... that would be weaker than said consoles, mind you, and that they can get at that price if they are lucky.
All on the core assumption that they just want to get anything at all, and just went into a store to get something they can play games on.
That's not making sense, sir... it's pushing an agenda.