You said it was likely fed.
Nah, Patsies aren't paid out the rear for their services.She's a patsy. Patsy - A person who is easily taken advantage of, especially by being cheated or blamed for something.
To use it in a sentence.
Phil had a mischievous sparkle in his eye when he spotted his patsy Sarah.
"Vague claim, no evidence presented.I didn't say it was clearly fake at all. Please go and find the post where I said. I won't respond to anything else from you until you do.
Best of luck.
So who would you blame? This is coming from workers within Microsoft, Bond was pushing "this is Xbox" and Spencer at that point was geared towards incorporating Activision.Seems like that is the plan. They're throwing Sarah under the bus to justify the 180.
We have multiple sources saying it was known since August and then you have Greg miller say live on stream that he got a message that Phil was fired.
Yeah, Im deffo stupid to trust the multiple sources ive seen that mention August last year vs Greg live on a stream from a "Trust me bro" source.
You believe what you want, mate. Im not going to believe Greg miller. The guy is a douche and betrayed one of his closest friends. Fucking snake.
If true she came up with the 'this is an Xbox' ad she should have been fired out of a cannon ages ago.
It's genuinely pointless to post any more articles about any of this at even this early stage because it's clear that most of you decided you knew exactly what happened and why the minute the leadership changes were announced.
No amount of evidence will convince you otherwise from here on out so frankly what is the point of sharing any articles about it that don't completely align with what you instantly decided based on no evidence? There isn't any.
So all of these discussions will be pointless from now on. Look at the hysterical hostility to any suggestion that anything happened in a different way to what you assumed. Any articles making such suggestions will be sneered at and rejected and anything that even vaguely suggest any of your original takes will be grabbed onto as the "right and proper" reporting on this.
It's so obvious.
If true she came up with the 'this is an Xbox' ad she should have been fired out of a cannon ages ago.
news.microsoft.com
Their biggest problem is GAMEPASS, results will never improve with day 1 releases on gamepass, xbox players don`t buy games anymore.
I don't have a hate boner for Phil like others here. But he shares as much blame as Sarah and Nutella here. Everything she did went through them for approval and it aligned with the overall goal leadership wanted.So who would you blame? This is coming from workers within Microsoft, Bond was pushing "this is Xbox" and Spencer at that point was geared towards incorporating Activision.
It obviously doesn't fit with the Gaf it was all Spencer's fault mentality (some are trying to claim he was fired) but she lost focus on what Xbox is and it's now obvious she was allowed the dignity of resigning or face the firing squad. Spencer on the other hand leaves with a "Golden Handshake" and that same smug grin he always had.
This article is hilarious.Sure blame it all on Sarah![]()
She wasn't a genuine gamer ?The team running Sarah Bond's social media accounts
Not if this is to be believed right? How accurate this is I don't know? I strongly believe Spencer saved Xbox with Gamepass regardless what some think a service doesn't run for 10yrs if it's not generating profit and let's not forget what he inherited from Mattrick.I don't have a hate boner for Phil like others here. But he shares as much blame as Sarah and Nutella here. Everything she did went through them for approval and it aligned with the overall goal leadership wanted.
So we have conflicting reports and the only non-'trust me bro' source is Microsoft itself last year and that was a lie. Don't believe Greg Miller. I never said you should. He is definitely a douche, but that doesn't make him right or wrong.
It may have been her bad idea, but Phil and Satya should have pushed back. Still its bullkshit that she is being made into the scapegoat.We have heard from multiple sources that Phil was known to be retiring as far ago as last August. Totally normal. The article explains why it broke like it did, which does tell us a lot.
Lots of failings at MS that fall solely at Phil's feet.
I am talking about this article and Sarah Bond, it all makes complete sense. She came in, tried to put her stamp on the business like many CEOs do and it didnt work. She had to deal with staff leaving and she rolled with what she thought was right under Phil's sign off.
Everyone was going on about how terrible that marketing campaign was "This is an Xbox" it was BAD. That, is what the article says was Sarahs contribution and Pappa Satya did not like it after seeing the backlash, simple as that.
The industry does nothing but talk about Xbox. I really cant wrap my head around it. It's like every day theres new articles about the company thats in a distant third?
Who gives a shit! - I really don't understand it.
If Xbox is irrelevant, why won't they stop talking about it?
Did Greg actually claim that he was "fired on Friday"?Just to be clear. I think Gregg is talking bullshit about Phil being fired on Friday. No business would do that.
It may have been her bad idea, but Phil and Satya should have pushed back. Still its bullkshit that she is being made into the scapegoat.
What exactly did phil inherit from Mattrick? Xbox one has sold better series consoles. Even if you consider the most favourable sales numbers( according to rumours) series consoles have sold approximately 37 million units. Xbox one sold around 58 million units.Not if this is to be believed right? How accurate this is I don't know? I strongly believe Spencer saved Xbox with Gamepass regardless what some think a service doesn't run for 10yrs if it's not generating profit and let's not forget what he inherited from Mattrick.
No.Did Greg actually claim that he was "fired on Friday"?
Phil Spencer shares blame for the Xbox One just like he shares blame for the state Xbox is currently in.Not if this is to be believed right? How accurate this is I don't know? I strongly believe Spencer saved Xbox with Gamepass regardless what some think a service doesn't run for 10yrs if it's not generating profit and let's not forget what he inherited from Mattrick.
Damn, dunking on Sarah Bond saying that "Xbox Anywhere" was her idea is absolutely fucking brutal lol.
Yeah, that ad campaign was one of the worst ever, but it's not like everything was done by her alone.
The only thing I believe in the article is that Sarah was not liked internally. Both by regular staff and Microsoft leadership.
But ultimately this article is a form of damage control. It allows Microsoft to wash their hands of the failures over the past couple years and, in their minds, restore faith in the Xbox brand. Assmar, or whatever her name is, will roll out a blades dashboard (that was already in the works) and take credit for it like she's saving Xbox. The glazing has already begun.
This is 100% how it reads to me as well. "Everything that's wrong with Xbox's strategy was the black woman's fault. Please ignore her boss!"
It really feels like the Verge just regurgitating a list of prepared talking points from Microsoft leadership and vaguely editorializing around them.
Yeah, Tom Warren's article awful. Revisionist history attempting to scapegoat Sarah Bond.
Disgusting tbh.
Did Greg actually claim that he was "fired on Friday"?
Reading comments on other forums, like this one from REEE
It is surely a damage control from Verge and making Phil Spencer great again. :/
So it's possible that both conflicting reports are legitimate. Verge may be having sources amongst devs, who are privy to internal memos, attitude towards the management and "office gossip". And Greg (or Sneakers or Heisenberg) are hearing from higher ups, where the political maneuvering happens behind the scenes. From different perspectives, both could be true.No.
He said that the abruptness of it was clearly "not planned."
Something most with logic and common sense can agree on.
And this article does a good job of explaining why it was so abrupt. But, we would have to trust Tom Warren to be an honest journalist.No.
He said that the abruptness of it was clearly "not planned."
Something most with logic and common sense can agree on.
I think this is probably more of the truth.So it's possible that both conflicting reports are legitimate. Verge may be having sources amongst devs, who are privy to internal memos, attitude towards the management and "office gossip". And Greg (or Sneakers or Heisenberg) are hearing from higher ups, where the political maneuvering happens behind the scenes. From different perspectives, both could be true.
Are we really supposed to believe that the multiplatform imperative did not from Microsoft demanding actual profits on games? I thought it was understood that Amy Hood, in particular, advocated for this approach.