feynoob
Member
At least they are not dumb like MS.Its too bad they didnt just buy square outright back then :/
MS had a clear chance to buy Sega on early Xbox life cycle. They went ahead and bought rare.
At least they are not dumb like MS.Its too bad they didnt just buy square outright back then :/
some of the replies are fuckin hilarious thoI feel sick reading this
Xbox Fans Spam Every FTC Post After Activision Blizzard Lawsuit Loss
Xbox fans spam the FTC and send abuse to its commissioner following the acquisition lawsuit.www.thegamer.com
I doubt itMS will close the deal and piss on the UK CMA.
Glory to the US.
/S
CMA didn’t do their final report yetHas cma ever allowed companies to merge after blocking them in their final report, surely they have to wait another 3 months right.
You have too much faith in people.If MS actually try subvert the CMA's decision and close the acquisition against it I genuinely hope the subsequent fines, asset seizures, financial sanctions, and other assorted responses deployed by the UK government are so severe that MS execs are forced to shutter the Xbox divsion and beg on their collective knees for a reprieve before their shareholders have them executed.
I'm down.
Need to know the name of this scientific paper, for research of course.
It's funny that the CMA and FTC met 26 times and instead of following the CMA's lead about cloud and not focusing on CoD, which the CMA subsequently dropped months ago, they decided to go rogue and completely make an ass out of themselves in one of the biggest cases they'll ever face.
Pretty much. The music industry shrunk to about half its size when streaming became dominant and has never recovered. I bet that half is dominated by the biggest, mainstream appointed pop stars. With video games, there's basically no way out if streaming/subscription becomes dominant except betting on big GaaS type games like Genshin Impact or having a model similar to GTA V.
That’s some next level touch grass momentIf MS actually try subvert the CMA's decision and close the acquisition against it I genuinely hope the subsequent fines, asset seizures, financial sanctions, and other assorted responses deployed by the UK government are so severe that MS execs are forced to shutter the Xbox divsion and beg on their collective knees for a reprieve before their shareholders have them executed.
Most of the world's regulator's have passed approval of the deal (and most without restrictions) or chose not to contest it, but the CMA is the respectful and professional regulator...lolI doubt it
CMA is the only highly respectful and professional regulator left in the game
Oh and highly independent
Yeah that is sort of what I was trying to say with that post, especially what I bolded. You've clarified even further. I hope people are aware of what this means for all of their favorite IP's owned by ABK (most of which ABK have left to die).The key difference is that for gaming streaming is not an equal replacement delivery mechanism. Its inferior. Period.
Al-a-carte service offerings have additional shortcomings and caveats due to the pattern of user consumption being entirely different. Something that makes things like transitioning to multi-tier offers like ad-free/ad-supported harder to manage. Similarly there are more in the way of perverse incentives such as wanting to offer content for sale parallel with the service.
The reality is that the perfect Gamepass title for profitability looks like Fortnite. A F2P title laden GaaS with MTX except that initial buy-in is gated behind the service or charged externally at premium.
This is what makes me think that the more content MS try to funnel into the platform the more deleterious it will be to quality overall as they will absolutely seek towards the most lucrative format for content but that in turn will be corrosive to the interests of those who seek to offer more traditional fare as they will be forced to compete (and justify their "value" as inclusions) on a monetarily level playing-field.
Because Xbox doesn't have presence in those "most of the countries" so of course there is no anti-competitive concerns there. How could Korea or China or Japan block this acquisition when Xbox has virtually 0 presence there?Most of the world's regulator's have passed approval of the deal (and most without restrictions) or chose not to contest it, but the CMA is the respectful and professional regulator...lol
So what happens if the the CMA concedes approval with some concessions? Are they no longer respectful, professional or independent.
"Buh gawd King, the fix is in, the fix is in!"Most of the world's regulator's have passed approval of the deal (and most without restrictions) or chose not to contest it, but the CMA is the respectful and professional regulator...lol
So what happens if the the CMA concedes approval with some concessions? Are they no longer respectful, professional or independent.
The key difference is that for gaming streaming is not an equal replacement delivery mechanism. Its inferior. Period.
Al-a-carte service offerings have additional shortcomings and caveats due to the pattern of user consumption being entirely different. Something that makes things like transitioning to multi-tier offers like ad-free/ad-supported harder to manage. Similarly there are more in the way of perverse incentives such as wanting to offer content for sale parallel with the service.
The reality is that the perfect Gamepass title for profitability looks like Fortnite. A F2P title laden GaaS with MTX except that initial buy-in is gated behind the service or charged externally at premium.
This is what makes me think that the more content MS try to funnel into the platform the more deleterious it will be to quality overall as they will absolutely seek towards the most lucrative format for content but that in turn will be corrosive to the interests of those who seek to offer more traditional fare as they will be forced to compete (and justify their "value" as inclusions) on a monetarily level playing-field.
US Tax payer pay the operating expenses of the FTC including the money they waste on these hope and prayer cases they've been launching recently.
"Buh gawd King, the fix is in, the fix is in!"
No, it shows valid concerns about Sony's future in the industry. The wider issues are merely distractions.Thats a shitty attitude tbh, the post shows valid concerns about the future of this industry.
Hate to burst your bubble, bur console gaming is only a very small part of the overall market. This is going to increase competition in the Console sector, hopefully creating a more even market. It will increase competition in Mobile gaming which is currently extremely closed off. It should help XBox become a closer competitor to Steam and Epic in PC Gaming. Cloud Gaming is the only real concern and it’s doubtful just how big and how significant that Sector will ever really become. The FTC handled the case badly but the main issue was they didn’t have one. There were arguments to be made that this was bad for consumers but they were weak ones many of which have already had remedies offered. However the FTC concentrated too much on why it would be bad for the market leader.Can someone actually explain WHY this deal is "great for the industry and gamers as a whole" instead of ABK just remaining 3rd party. Are we going to pretend that COD on a new nintendo system wouldnt have happened anyway and Bobby wouldnt have chased all that $$$.
Most of the world's regulator's have passed approval of the deal (and most without restrictions) or chose not to contest it, but the CMA is the respectful and professional regulator...lol
So what happens if the the CMA concedes approval with some concessions? Are they no longer respectful, professional or independent.
Hate to burst your bubble, bur console gaming is only a very small part of the overall market.
No it doesnt. But i guess expecting someone to read the whole post before replying to it with a warrior like remark is too much.No, it shows valid concerns about Sony's future in the industry. The wider issues are merely distractions.
Yeah, I guess its normal to act unhinged about your fav plastic box, amirite?Always going to happen though, people pick sides, enough people have on here, and were delighted when it looked like the deal was going to be blocked.
Hard to disagree. Having many months to go over the data and deciding on hard stances towards this, only to back down in the closing hours? Especially if, as you say, the proposed solution is rather light compared to their original suggestions. It sets a tough precedent for them going forward.In my mind, CMA's reputation is on the line due to the fact that they have already laid out plainly why this acquisition should be prohibited. If CMA acquiesces and allows the acquisition then their independence is rightfully going to be called into question especially if the accepted remedies appear to be largely inconsequential.
So you agree then, still pretty small... I know most hate mobile games, but it's still the biggest sector.Console gaming is 29% of the entire market. It is the largest segment of the non-mobile gaming market.
I read your post, but did not simply agree with it.No it doesnt. But i guess expecting someone to read the whole post before replying to it with a warrior like remark is too much.
That wasnt my post.I read your post, but did not simply agree with it.
It's a small very vocal minority that do it, but they are very present on gaming forums.Yeah, I guess its normal to act unhinged about your fav plastic box, amirite?
Picking sides is one thing, doing what those Xbox fanboys are doing is.....something.
Plus courts are not involved in the uk, so the cma can do whatever the the fuck they want.US laws are different in this area and are much more fact based in the here and now. Prognosticating about one possible outcome of a future market while overstating MS position in this future market won't fly in the US. The FTC had no case here from the start and they admitted as much themselves by trying to play the timing game. If they had any angle they thought they could win from they would have scheduled the legal proceedings safely within the large window of time they already had. Instead they decided to try running out the clock in hopes of ending the deal without due process.
Their reasoning makes no sense so nothing was laid out plainly.In my mind, CMA's reputation is on the line due to the fact that they have already laid out plainly why this acquisition should be prohibited. If CMA acquiesces and allows the acquisition then their independence is rightfully going to be called into question especially if the accepted remedies appear to be largely inconsequential.
"Thats a shitty attitude tbh, the post shows valid concerns about the future of this industry."That wasnt my post.
Yet they did nothing of the sort with MinecraftStop. Stop. Nintendo will get one COD game. Xbox will argue it's not financially viable to release on Nintendo. It doesn't matter the sales figures, they will likely charge 100 special edition so to minimise sales on Nintendo. They will have fulfilled their Nintendo obligation. Completed under 10 years.
Sony will only have CoD to 2 years prior to launch of the new console generation. The year before the new console launch will be a gap year and then COD on Xbox next gen only. Completed under 10 years, Sony will not sign the 10 year deal so no recourse.
Steam will be the longest. The sooner MS makes a PC store that doesn't fucking suck, the sooner MS/Bethesda/ABK games will be removed from Steam.
Nvidia games will be removed as the contract allows MS many options to cancel the deal. I sure MS lawyers can slap some makeup on one to seem credible.
The shitty companies that signed the 10 year deals will probably be bought well before the 10 years are up if they don't go under first.
Tom Warren's takes change dramatically hourly it seems. All eyes on CAT because it might reveal where CMA's going with all this. That's the big question really. Is CMA using this as a delay tactic? Using it to back out of their block? Hard to get a handle on it for me.
Exactly, lol.BEFORE:
NOW:
So you agree then, still pretty small... I know most hate mobile games, but it's still the biggest sector.
Their reasoning makes no sense so nothing was laid out plainly.
They know they fucked up more than once
(Console market math, getting emotional over EU’s decision, Sony talking points, The Cloud reasoning, working in tandem with a FTC that was basing their logic on ideologies)
They are just trying to save face at this point.
Most of us ... since the beginning really.. it all stops at CMASo......FTC lost?
seriously.......been saying that was going to happen for months.
Most of us ... since the beginning really.. it all stops at CMA
By the way.. expecting your meltdown anytime now pleaseThis is the gif I used months ago to demonstrate how Microsoft would deal with the FTC....
Smaller then.No. The fact that mobile is the largest segment doesn't make a $52 billion dollar industry small by any means.
Well, that's why the report was called "provisional" and not "final". They recognized the mistakes and threw out the theories of harm related to them. You can disagree with their final report, but the fact that they fixed their mistakes adds to the reports credibility. I don't get this notion people have that if the provisional report wasn't flawless then none of the reasoning is valid. Makes absolutely no sense.
FTC was NEVER an obstacle, yup, and I don’t get the surprised pika faces over their failure.This is the gif I used months ago to demonstrate how Microsoft would deal with the FTC....
And aside from Call of Duty, Playstation gamers soon won't.
Mobile grew the gaming market exponentially, it’s not as simple as saying console gaming just got smaller.So you agree then, still pretty small... I know most hate mobile games, but it's still the biggest sector.
Totally agree the core space has pretty much remained the same, so when some suggest it's grown, they are not taking into account Nintendo have gone in a different direction ever since the Wii and DS, so many of their customers would not buy core consoles anyway.Mobile grew the gaming market exponentially, it’s not as simple as saying console gaming just got smaller.
By the way.. expecting your meltdown anytime now please
How does it help them vs steam when they are releasing every game on Steam...and its just a storefront anyway. I would say good luck in prying people away from Steam especially with the Steam Deck now being a thing.Hate to burst your bubble, bur console gaming is only a very small part of the overall market. This is going to increase competition in the Console sector, hopefully creating a more even market. It will increase competition in Mobile gaming which is currently extremely closed off. It should help XBox become a closer competitor to Steam and Epic in PC Gaming. Cloud Gaming is the only real concern and it’s doubtful just how big and how significant that Sector will ever really become. The FTC handled the case badly but the main issue was they didn’t have one. There were arguments to be made that this was bad for consumers but they were weak ones many of which have already had remedies offered. However the FTC concentrated too much on why it would be bad for the market leader.
I think its funny how the ftc put the Activision will give MS Playstation secrets into the appeal.....they do realize MLB the show is made by Sony for the XBox right? No worry about secrets there I guess. Oh and how many games has insomniac made for xbox since sony purchased them? MS wants to bring gamepass to everyone no matter what console/phone/etc you own. How is it any different than EA or Ubisofts services? Not to mention they want to challenge apple and google stores so I dont think there will be very many exclusives period. Goes against what they are really trying to do in the long run.
I think its funny how the ftc put the Activision will give MS Playstation secrets into the appeal.....they do realize MLB the show is made by Sony for the XBox right? No worry about secrets there I guess. Oh and how many games has insomniac made for xbox since sony purchased them? MS wants to bring gamepass to everyone no matter what console/phone/etc you own. How is it any different than EA or Ubisofts services? Not to mention they want to challenge apple and google stores so I dont think there will be very many exclusives period. Goes against what they are really trying to do in the long run.