• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Topher

Gold Member
If you can't see how it would be bad to only have one of Sony or MS in the higher end console gaming space you are crazy.

It would be awful.

Jim Carrey What GIF
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Because I’m sure folks at Activision wants to get paid. Through acquisition or exclusivity deals. I never meant that the exclusivity deal would be cheap. Just as costly as the acquisition, I would imagine.
Activision makes $2B a year in profit. They're doing great from a company POV. Individual suits not getting a premium on the share doesn't really count as they don't get paid because of any exclusivity deal.

Besides, they will get a cash injection of up to $3 billion from Microsoft as a penalty if/when the deal falls through.

Microsoft said the COD exclusivity does not make financial sense. It wouldn't make financial sense if the deal falls through.
 

FoxMcChief

Gold Member
If you can't see how it would be bad to only have one of Sony or MS in the higher end console gaming space you are crazy.

It would be awful.
I don’t get what you’re saying. This move either way wouldn’t change that. Sony has a majority lead over the competition right now. Xbox isn’t going anywhere.

Is this the new “Nintendo is doomed”?
 

NickFire

Member
The funniest are the ones that care way too much about this. They care so much about a mega corp buying a mega corp and fear mega corp will keep video games from other mega corp.

It’s fucking video games.
Nah. Funniest of them all are the ones hypothesizing on how Activision will take revenge on Sony if the deal is blocked. As if Activision would change their entire business model and tank their stock price just to teach their most lucrative partner a stern lesson.

A close second are the people trying to spin the narrative to the deal being necessary to prevent a monopoly.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Because Sony is nearing a monopoly. I don't know why you guys are that surprised. Im not. This what I argued from the start. Can you not imagine 10 years into the future with current trends? Google, Amazon, MS are all going to eventually get tired of lighting money on fire.
As multiple people (including me) have said it before.

(1) Sony is not a monopoly.
(2) Even if it were, no regulator would look into it and try to make Sony small because monopolies are allowed by law. Monopolies through unfair means, however, are not.
 

knocksky

Banned
This is wrong thinking. There is still Nintendo if they decide to up their game. Also you have to remember that Sony is “also” competing with PC. They can’t fall too far behind or folks will just switch over to PC.
Perhaps, or more than likely Sony would squash Nintendo down to first party and some Indies.
 

Topher

Gold Member
It has me thinking what the actual market share is (excluding mobile)

Sony - 35%
PC - 30%
Nintendo - 25%
Microsoft - 10%

Complete guesses but probably not too far off

I believe PC gaming was as almost as large as console gaming last time I looked. Either way, no matter how you slice the gaming industry up, the narrative of a monopoly existing in any of it is just a made up fantasy.


Here you go Q quest

Newzoo_Global-Games-Market-per-Segment_Nov-2022.png


Not as close as I thought, but still that's a hefty chunk of the market in the PC realm.
 
Last edited:

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Agree with Tom. This "Microsoft is going to sell off Xbox" narrative is a knee-jerk reaction that gets regurgitated every few years. It makes no sense.
While it is how you say, but the situation is very different this time.

To put it into a summarized perspective: they have spent over $10 billion dollars in the division, and XBS is selling worse than Xbox One.

Nobody saw that coming. Honestly, even I didn't. In all prediction threads around launch, I always said that XBS would sell 60-70 million consoles. Now it's tracking to sell around ~40-45 million consoles. Xbox One sold ~52 million consoles.

They can eat the cost only so much and for so long. They did consider shutting down Xbox around 2016-2017, so it's not completely baseless or without precedence. It's a possibility that's stronger than ever.

Having said that, I still believe that Xbox would first go multiplatform rather than shutting down immediately.
 

quest

Not Banned from OT
While it is how you say, but the situation is very different this time.

To put it into a summarized perspective: they have spent over $10 billion dollars in the division, and XBS is selling worse than Xbox One.

Nobody saw that coming. Honestly, even I didn't. In all prediction threads around launch, I always said that XBS would sell 60-70 million consoles. Now it's tracking to sell around ~40-45 million consoles. Xbox One sold ~52 million consoles.

They can eat the cost only so much and for so long. They did consider shutting down Xbox around 2016-2017, so it's not completely baseless or without precedence. It's a possibility that's stronger than ever.

Having said that, I still believe that Xbox would first go multiplatform rather than shutting down immediately.

Why would they bother with 3rd party and almost no returns. More likely they shutdown the hardware division and sell the studios to tencent. Make a clean break instead of pissing money away being a 3rd party with zero upside for a company the size of Microsoft.
 

Topher

Gold Member
While it is how you say, but the situation is very different this time.

To put it into a summarized perspective: they have spent over $10 billion dollars in the division, and XBS is selling worse than Xbox One.

Nobody saw that coming. Honestly, even I didn't. In all prediction threads around launch, I always said that XBS would sell 60-70 million consoles. Now it's tracking to sell around ~40-45 million consoles. Xbox One sold ~52 million consoles.

They can eat the cost only so much and for so long. They did consider shutting down Xbox around 2016-2017, so it's not completely baseless or without precedence. It's a possibility that's stronger than ever.

Having said that, I still believe that Xbox would first go multiplatform rather than shutting down immediately.

Hard to say about Xbox sales since we don't have numbers. My guess is Xbox Series is actually outselling Xbox One (when aligned) by quite some margin. Also, Tom is right. The investments made into Xbox are concrete examples of Microsoft's committment to Xbox. Xbox isn't a Zune or Nokia situation. It is a significant source of revenue with profitability. I'm guessing the margins are not what they would like them to be, but I see no reason for the Xbox division to be in doubt.
 

Loxus

Member
I'm not talking about the hardware. The entry price would still be reasonable.. it's the rest where the creep would start.
This applies to software as well.

Raising the prices to high would cause the userbase to find other means of gaming.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Why would they bother with 3rd party and almost no returns. More likely they shutdown the hardware division and sell the studios to tencent. Make a clean break instead of pissing money away being a 3rd party with zero upside for a company the size of Microsoft.
Xbox is a big operation; there will be very few buyers. Suppose Tencent is not interested in the deal. That leaves very few buyers on the market who can and would want to buy Xbox.

So it may be difficult to wind up operations just like that.

And I think there's money to be make as a third-party, like EA and Capcom for example, because Xbox has a ton of great IPs now. The problem is their hardware attach rate and low userbase. That's why they started releasing games on PC, but then AAA games have become more expensive, and it may not be viable as before.

If they release their high-profile IPs and games across all platforms: PC, Nintendo, PS, Xbox, etc. they can increase their ROI (which could prevent them from shutting down the Xbox brand completely). They can also make a first-party-only Game Pass tier and put it on Nintendo and PlayStation and can increase their subscribers to 50-60 million, which can also be profitable.
 

Punished Miku

Human Rights Subscription Service
While it is how you say, but the situation is very different this time.

To put it into a summarized perspective: they have spent over $10 billion dollars in the division, and XBS is selling worse than Xbox One.

Nobody saw that coming. Honestly, even I didn't. In all prediction threads around launch, I always said that XBS would sell 60-70 million consoles. Now it's tracking to sell around ~40-45 million consoles. Xbox One sold ~52 million consoles.

They can eat the cost only so much and for so long. They did consider shutting down Xbox around 2016-2017, so it's not completely baseless or without precedence. It's a possibility that's stronger than ever.

Having said that, I still believe that Xbox would first go multiplatform rather than shutting down immediately.
That's all I tried to say. And it wasn't a new narrative. That was my personal rationale for being in favor of this deal since it was announced. Pretty difficult to even speak in this thread with all the insults being thrown around, so I'm glad you were allowed to make the argument at least.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Hard to say about Xbox sales since we don't have numbers. My guess is Xbox Series is actually outselling Xbox One (when aligned) by quite some margin. Also, Tom is right. The investments made into Xbox are concrete examples of Microsoft's committment to Xbox. Xbox isn't a Zune or Nokia situation. It is a significant source of revenue with profitability. I'm guessing the margins are not what they would like them to be, but I see no reason for the Xbox division to be in doubt.
After the NPD leak, we have the US data now. We also have the UK data by the 1M and 2M milestones threshold. UK and US cover more than 75% of the Xbox market. We also have Japan's data. So that's like 80% of the total Xbox console sales accounted for.

We also have PS's official data that we can use to easily calculate Xbox's console sales data. A few GAF posters have already done it actually and compared it with Microsoft's submitted documents to regulators.

We can say with a very high confidence level that XBS is now tracking behind XBO.
 

Pelta88

Member
Xbox is a big operation; there will be very few buyers. Suppose Tencent is not interested in the deal. That leaves very few buyers on the market who can and would want to buy Xbox.

Given what we've seen of the actual numbers, I couldn't get past this particular point, respectfully. XBOX in the Apple case revealed they haven't made a profit. XBOX is attached to a huge an impactful conglomerate. Stripped back to its own business it's nowhere near as valuable as you believe it to be.

Without Microsoft footing the bill for every misadventure, I'm not sure the platform is viable.

I don't want XBOX to disappear and give Sony free reign over the console space. But the reality of XBOX is that it's been in poor shape for a decade. And that's without the 360 RROD debacle.
 

Topher

Gold Member
After the NPD leak, we have the US data now. We also have the UK data by the 1M and 2M milestones threshold. UK and US cover more than 75% of the Xbox market. We also have Japan's data. So that's like 80% of the total Xbox console sales accounted for.

We also have PS's official data that we can use to easily calculate Xbox's console sales data. A few GAF posters have already done it actually and compared it with Microsoft's submitted documents to regulators.

We can say with a very high confidence level that XBS is now tracking behind XBO.

I haven't seen this NPD leak. Was it posted on GAF?
 

knocksky

Banned
This applies to software as well.

Raising the prices to high would cause the userbase to find other means of gaming.
Where? PC. Where the barrier to entry is significantly higher. Or Nintendo, who would quickly find themselves squeezed by a Sony gaming behemoth. I.E a very limited library of 3rd party games.

I am struggling to find something good that would come out of Microsoft quitting the console business and giving Sony a monopoly.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
That's all I tried to say. And it wasn't a new narrative. That was my personal rationale for being in favor of this deal since it was announced. Pretty difficult to even speak in this thread with all the insults being thrown around, so I'm glad you were allowed to make the argument at least.
I'm always up for an actual, meaningful conversation if you want. Difference of opinion is okay.

As for the reason for favoring this deal -- I think it's just wrong. What if Xbox's situation doesn't improve after ABK? Like it didn't improve after Zenimax? Should they be allowed to acquire other studios -- like Ubisoft, Rockstar, CDPR, Capcom, etc. -- until they are able to compete head-to-head with PlayStation?

That cannot be the case.

Xbox's problems are not going to be solved by this acquisition. Just like those problems didn't go away with Zenimax. Xbox needs to improve its business model, make great games, focus on proper marketing, localization efforts, etc.

At the moment, they have more studios and IPs than PlayStation. They have all the resources they can possibly to need to compete. They just need to put those efforts in the right direction.
 

ArcaneNLSC

Member
I'm always up for an actual, meaningful conversation if you want. Difference of opinion is okay.

As for the reason for favoring this deal -- I think it's just wrong. What if Xbox's situation doesn't improve after ABK? Like it didn't improve after Zenimax? Should they be allowed to acquire other studios -- like Ubisoft, Rockstar, CDPR, Capcom, etc. -- until they are able to compete head-to-head with PlayStation?

That cannot be the case.

Xbox's problems are not going to be solved by this acquisition. Just like those problems didn't go away with Zenimax. Xbox needs to improve its business model, make great games, focus on proper marketing, localization efforts, etc.

At the moment, they have more studios and IPs than PlayStation. They have all the resources they can possibly to need to compete. They just need to put those efforts in the right direction.
Exactly Microsoft can't keep trying to buy its success by buying out the competition or all the IP it has to create its own success the hard way by fucking working and earning it like a lower class/middle class worker
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
I haven't seen this NPD leak. Was it posted on GAF?
Yes, it was. We also discussed it even in this thread I think. There was a thread IIRC but found this post for you.

US data:

- Xbox Series LTD = 8,763,000
- PS5 LTD = 10,592,000

PS4/Xbox One split in the US was 53:47. PS5/XBS split in the US is now 55:45, so they have already lost 2 percentage points of market share in the US. Considering that PS5 has gained market share from Xbox despite selling less than PS4 guarantees that XBS has sold less than Xbox One in the US.

Sony's CFO has also shared similar statements that validate this data.


Xbox Series X has also not sold 2 million units in the UK yet even after 116 weeks. Xbox One reached 2 million units in the UK in 104 weeks. So XBS has also sold less than Xbox One in the UK.

We also did a bunch of other calculations and estimates and found Xbox Series consoles around 16-17 million consoles sold LTD (18 million if we're being lenient). Microsoft also hasn't released any statement that "Xbox Series is still the best selling Xbox console" in their earning reports, further validating this.
 
Last edited:

Topher

Gold Member
Yeah - and the concession will be divestiture.

Wouldn't be the first time. I believe when the Disney Fox deal went through, the CMA required Disney to divest several assets.
Yes, it was. We also discussed it even in this thread I think. There was a thread IIRC but found this post for you.

US data:

- Xbox Series LTD = 8,763,000
- PS5 LTD = 10,592,000

PS4/Xbox One split in the US was 53:47. PS5/XBS split in the US is now 55:45, so they have already lost 2 percentage points of market share in the US. Considering that PS5 has gained market share from Xbox despite selling less than PS4 guarantees that XBS has sold less than Xbox One in the US.

Sony's CFO has also shared similar statements that validate this data.


Xbox Series X has also not sold 2 million units in the UK yet even after 116 weeks. Xbox One reached 2 million units in the UK in 104 weeks. So XBS has also sold less than Xbox One in the UK.

We also did a bunch of other calculations and estimates and found Xbox Series consoles around 17 million consoles sold LTD (18 million at best). Microsoft also hasn't released any statement that "Xbox Series is still the best selling Xbox console" in their earning reports, further validating this.

Obviously I missed all that. Thanks for digging up the link
 

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
I don’t get what you’re saying. This move either way wouldn’t change that. Sony has a majority lead over the competition right now. Xbox isn’t going anywhere.

Is this the new “Nintendo is doomed”?

I thought there were some posts saying Ms May sell of xbox or leave the industry.

Ignore me I'm obviously high lol
 

Punished Miku

Human Rights Subscription Service
I'm always up for an actual, meaningful conversation if you want. Difference of opinion is okay.

As for the reason for favoring this deal -- I think it's just wrong. What if Xbox's situation doesn't improve after ABK? Like it didn't improve after Zenimax? Should they be allowed to acquire other studios -- like Ubisoft, Rockstar, CDPR, Capcom, etc. -- until they are able to compete head-to-head with PlayStation?

That cannot be the case.

Xbox's problems are not going to be solved by this acquisition. Just like those problems didn't go away with Zenimax. Xbox needs to improve its business model, make great games, focus on proper marketing, localization efforts, etc.

At the moment, they have more studios and IPs than PlayStation. They have all the resources they can possibly to need to compete. They just need to put those efforts in the right direction.
I personally wouldn't support other large MS acquisitions, but that's just my opinion on it. I think they needed that 1 killer third party game on Gamepass. When 360 was thriving, they had the Call of Duty marketing rights as well. I do think they see Call of Duty as being somewhat fitting with their brand identity the one time they had some success. What I assumed was going to happen was Call of Duty staying multiplat like they said. Xbox would have marketing rights, and could say every year at E3 it's on Gamepass. That alone would be enough in my opinion to give them a fighting chance even if the game remains available for PS, which I think it would.

From my perspective, I have purchased 2 Activision/Blizz games in like 20 years so I feel their impact is really not that big of a deal (Diablo III and Wolverine Origins). It's a bit more games from Blizz on Gamepass, maybe some renewed strategy games on PC since MS supports that, and everyone still has Call of Duty. Seemed fine to me.

The reason I didn't feel it was that out of bounds for MS in this one instance is because from my point of view they're doing many things that encapsulate "fair" competition, and it's just not moving the needle at all. Cheaper console, cheaper games in many cases, new sub service with a cheap price, investing heavily in first party development. Lowering the price is the traditional way to compete. MS was literally cutting series S prices while Sony raised PS5 prices and you just saw the PS market share increase. At this moment in the present, that was really all I needed to see.

Further acquisitions I would view in a similar way by taking stock of the current strength and health of the companies involved and trying to see how it would impact evening things out. That's really all anyone can do. If it's not a giant impact, then it'll probably be fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom