• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Elon’s Twitter Carnival of Stupidity (No Politics)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Maiden Voyage

Gold™ Member


The question is, why did people think it was removed, and how could people even tell that it was removed if it was removed?

The original report has an on-record comment from Twitter themselves confirming it was down. I'm surprised Musk is refuting it...

After publication of this story, Twitter head of trust and safety Ella Irwin told Reuters in an email that "we have been fixing and revamping our prompts. They were just temporarily removed while we do that."

"We expect to have them back up next week," she said.

Ella Irwin is probably going to be looking for a job soon.
 
Last edited:

Thaedolus

Member
The original report has an on-record comment from Twitter themselves confirming it was down. I'm surprised Musk is refuting it...



Ella Irwin is probably going to be looking for a job soon.
This is one of those situations where Elon might be able to plausibly say what he said because it came back up by the time he said it…but the news article could’ve been correct as of time of publication. If that’s what happened, it’s a pretty classic gaslighting tactic.

Imagine someone sees the cookies in the cookie jar are gone. That person leaves and time goes by and while they are gone the guy who ate the cookies replaces them. Later when confronted about eating the cookies, the guy who ate them denies it and points to the cookies in the jar and paints the other as the villain for making the accusation.
 

Maiden Voyage

Gold™ Member
Lol..Just gone up on Reddit:




Yeah, just saw this. Not good.

I think the original breach was prior to Musk but it's now his problem to resolve.

Quote from the 'seller':
Twitter or Elon Musk if you are reading this you are already risking a GDPR fine over 5.4m breach imaging the fine of 400m users breach source
Your best option to avoid paying $276 million USD in GDPR breach fines like facebook did (due to 533m users being scraped) is to buy this data exclusively,
 
Last edited:

Maiden Voyage

Gold™ Member
ib5hb0qed48a1.jpg
 

Bitmap Frogs

Mr. Community
And now a massive data breach.

Musk's twitter is a veritable moving catastrophe, never fully settling in before it hits again.
 

HoodWinked

Member
Probably shouldn't have fired everyone, and put a target on his back. Welp, live and learn I suppose.

makes no difference they all used the same known exploit. all of this data was scraped prior to him purchasing twitter. these are all just separately saved dumps script kiddies have been sitting on.

 

akimbo009

Gold Member
makes no difference they all used the same known exploit. all of this data was scraped prior to him purchasing twitter. these are all just separately saved dumps script kiddies have been sitting on.


Should have patched faster. Many hands make light work, and all that.
 

akimbo009

Gold Member
That makes no sense, unless you're saying more hands to develop a time machine. This was fixed and occured during the period when Twitter had the most employees.

Embargoed vulnerabilities are known to the company before the public, before "script kiddies" get a hold of it. Seems someone was asleep at the wheel and that's not getting better everyday that passes without the right talent in place.
 

HoodWinked

Member
Embargoed vulnerabilities are known to the company before the public, before "script kiddies" get a hold of it. Seems someone was asleep at the wheel and that's not getting better everyday that passes without the right talent in place.
the literal timeline of the report/fix/disclosure is in the link.

7nwa3Re.png
 
Last edited:
Anyone with a Twitter account want to experiment with this?


Twitter's response:


This shows you what a fool Elon Musk is. He only wants speed, and doesn’t think about features deeper than what they are on the surface level.

Elon does not understand requirements gathering, which would have been useful for views. He wanted this feature for mostly himself, so when he saw that he looked at a tweet and the view count went up, he considered it a success. They only did superficial level testing.

In twitters implementation you don’t even have to read the tweet to generate a view, you just have to scroll over it on your timeline.

They try to use the excuse of “we shipped this fast” but really they are incompetent. They are using users for testing and feedback because they are too incompetent to design and release a working feature.

This is why every feature or improvement they make ends up being trash.
 
Last edited:

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
This shows you what a fool Elon Musk is. He only wants speed, and doesn’t think about features deeper than what they are on the surface level.

Elon does not understand requirements gathering, which would have been useful for views. He wanted this feature for mostly himself, so when he saw that he looked at a tweet and the view count went up, he considered it a success. They only did superficial level testing.

In twitters implementation you don’t even have to read the tweet to generate a view, you just have to scroll over it on your timeline.

They try to use the excuse of “we shipped this fast” but really they are incompetent. They are using users for testing and feedback because they are too incompetent to design and release a working feature.

This is why every feature or improvement they make ends up being trash.
Yeah there doesnt seem to be any R&D, just development. The research, spec, design stage is all gone. QA seems to be scared to bring up issues too. They are basically coding on the go over the whims of their client who happens to be their owner, and that’s never a good idea.
 

Ionian

Member
Hang on, as someone has pointed out already that forum post that was alerting the exploit, was 12 months ago. He didn't have ownership at that stage.

Something fishy and that's and even if it was privately disclosed to him or not.
 

BadBurger

Is 'That Pure Potato'
The data breech that led to Twitter being under a consent decree happening before Musk bought the company is common knowledge for those who follow tech news. But it is now his problem, and he has by all accounts done his best not to abide by it.
 

Maiden Voyage

Gold™ Member
This shows you what a fool Elon Musk is. He only wants speed, and doesn’t think about features deeper than what they are on the surface level.

Elon does not understand requirements gathering, which would have been useful for views. He wanted this feature for mostly himself, so when he saw that he looked at a tweet and the view count went up, he considered it a success. They only did superficial level testing.

In twitters implementation you don’t even have to read the tweet to generate a view, you just have to scroll over it on your timeline.

They try to use the excuse of “we shipped this fast” but really they are incompetent. They are using users for testing and feedback because they are too incompetent to design and release a working feature.

This is why every feature or improvement they make ends up being trash.
Yeah, I mean Elon has himself said he wants the ability to make quick decisions & implement and work out the bugs or drop it entirely based on feedback. I actually don't disagree with the idea or intent. Hell, at my work we push for adaptability so we can get to market ASAP. If R&D takes 2+ years, you're going to get beat out by small start-ups or hyper talented individuals. The issue is that there seems to be a lot ideas thrown out without any discussion of potential consequences. This makes sense in a brainstorming sessions (to help keep creative ideas flowing). After the brainstorming though, there needs to be a critical review.

I see all of this and no one even points back to this:


Yeah, exactly. I think it's easy to dunk on things when they don't work and there is something positive to be said about Musk being willing to publicly own the failures. We only really learn from our mistakes.

There's plenty to dislike about Musk. but he's not all bad or all evil. I still believe Twitter has a strong chance to recover from the bad PR. Musk too. As I said before, some philanthropy and a few charitable donations and he's back in good graces. It may take a few years.
 

Maiden Voyage

Gold™ Member
All quiet on the Elon front but I did see this morning some Toots (lol) from the Elon Jet Tracker guy:
ZUzuSqE.png

0jxVh9z.png


Direct links:
 

Ionian

Member
I see all of this and no one even points back to this:



I kinda did, had no idea what he was talking about at the time though.

Kinda did on my part as I had no idea, just something dodgy was up.

I guess that was it? I don't work there, I'm purely guessing. Again this post was 12 months ago.

If I was spending 1k never mind want he spent, I'd being doing due diligence and if the exploit was pointed out at that stage and a court ruled against me, forcing me to buy? (LOL yeah right he was forced). He'd have grounds to back out if he was not made aware of it.

Goes some way to explain the mass firings from data he once he took the reins. Tinfoil hat, there's more to come no doubt.
 

Ionian

Member
All quiet on the Elon front but I did see this morning some Toots (lol) from the Elon Jet Tracker guy:
ZUzuSqE.png

0jxVh9z.png


Direct links:

Pieces, slowly slotting into space (X). haha
 
Yeah, I mean Elon has himself said he wants the ability to make quick decisions & implement and work out the bugs or drop it entirely based on feedback. I actually don't disagree with the idea or intent. Hell, at my work we push for adaptability so we can get to market ASAP. If R&D takes 2+ years, you're going to get beat out by small start-ups or hyper talented individuals. The issue is that there seems to be a lot ideas thrown out without any discussion of potential consequences. This makes sense in a brainstorming sessions (to help keep creative ideas flowing). After the brainstorming though, there needs to be a critical review.


Yeah, exactly. I think it's easy to dunk on things when they don't work and there is something positive to be said about Musk being willing to publicly own the failures. We only really learn from our mistakes.

There's plenty to dislike about Musk. but he's not all bad or all evil. I still believe Twitter has a strong chance to recover from the bad PR. Musk too. As I said before, some philanthropy and a few charitable donations and he's back in good graces. It may take a few years.

Move fast and probably break things whist taking feedback that helps you fix bugs primarily, and then go back and make some improvements on (or in twitters case fully redesign) the same feature wont work.

The first reason is because all of the features put out so far have had no design behind them. They have to go back to the beginning to get these features designed and working.

The second is that they will be implementing a feature like views for the next 6 months, when it realistically may just take two months to do the whole thing right. It’s going to once again tank Elons reputation or what’s left of it. With proper competion they would be laughed at even harder. Elon couldn’t find success with this tactic as a startup, the app would never get anywhere.
 
Last edited:
Old twitter: We will take millions from the government to pay our employees who will censor jokes and satire in the name of saving you from misinformation. We will decide what truth is. We will ban people according to a highly subjective interpretation of our own vague rules, and then force them to say we were right to ban them before they are allowed back.* If we want to ban people who are not breaking the rules, we will make up a new rule so we can ban them. We will gaslight you as to what the definition of shadow banning is, so we can drastically reduce the voices of people we don't like, and claim that we're not doing so. We won't tell our CEO about any of this, or consult him much at all, because he actually believes we shouldn't be doing these things.

New twitter: We will introduce a new view count feature that is a little wonky and inaccurate. In fact, we'll do a lot of stupid things that we'll have to quickly undo, and that we shouldn't have done in the first place, but none of it will be of any lasting consequence.

Yeah, I'm going to have to go with the new one.

* Note that Musk under twitter still does this crap, and I'm still opposed to it.


And here's few words about the twitter files, where much of the above was confirmed after previously being speculation:


 
Last edited:

Maiden Voyage

Gold™ Member
Old twitter: We will take millions from the government to pay our employees who will censor jokes and satire in the name of saving you from misinformation. We will decide what truth is. We will ban people according to a highly subjective interpretation of our own vague rules, and then force them to say we were right to ban them before they are allowed back.* If we want to ban people who are not breaking the rules, we will make up a new rule so we can ban them. We will gaslight you as to what the definition of shadow banning is, so we can drastically reduce the voices of people we don't like, and claim that we're not doing so. We won't tell our CEO about any of this, or consult him much at all, because he actually believes we shouldn't be doing these things.

New twitter: We will introduce a new view count feature that is a little wonky and inaccurate. In fact, we'll do a lot of stupid things that we'll have to quickly undo, and that we shouldn't have done in the first place, but none of it will be of any lasting consequence.

Yeah, I'm going to have to go with the new one.

* Note that Musk under twitter still does this crap, and I'm still opposed to it.


And here's few words about the twitter files, where much of the above was confirmed after previously being speculation:



Is there a succinct, non-biased summary of the Twitter files anywhere? I can’t stand when people try to convey complex topics over tweets and haven’t seen any tea coverage online that’s not completely one sided on either end.
 

Punished Miku

Gold Member
Is there a succinct, non-biased summary of the Twitter files anywhere? I can’t stand when people try to convey complex topics over tweets and haven’t seen any tea coverage online that’s not completely one sided on either end.
The entire thing is inherently biased, but its still noteworthy and worth reading. The only way it would be non-biased is if all Twitter files were released to multiple newspapers and non-opinion journalists. Instead we have a billionaire and owner of the site personally selecting what he wants to reveal and what he doesn't want to reveal, and it reflects his own self interests. He even required that it be released on Twitter, literally making it a publicity stunt to benefit his site. Its also entirely focused on exposing negative liberal elements, but doesn't reveal any of the Trump requests to Twitter while they were in the white house. It also doesn't reveal anything since Elon has been in charge.

The only way you'll get a full picture is to read through articles explaining what is noteworthy about it. Then read through the stuff criticizing it and pointing out all the huge issues with how its been curated and released and what elements they decided to focus on. Then think about it on your own and decide which parts you find convincing from the two viewpoints.
 
Is there a succinct, non-biased summary of the Twitter files anywhere? I can’t stand when people try to convey complex topics over tweets and haven’t seen any tea coverage online that’s not completely one sided on either end.

I don't think so, and I wouldn't trust a summary coming from any journalist who I feel favors one major party or another. It honestly doesn't take too long to and isn't too unwieldy to read the tweet threads themselves. And most of it has been critical of power rather than who is using it against whom, which is good to see. In fact some of the most interesting reporting has been of a handful of twitter employees pushing back on what they were told to censor, but ultimately being overruled or ignored.

I do know that one of the only requirements journalists had to agree to was that all of their findings would first appear on twitter. I would imagine eventually most of the reporting will make its way to substack articles and such.
 
Its also entirely focused on exposing negative liberal elements
This isn't quite accurate, but I'm not going to get into the left / right aspects that would be needed to explain. That's why I quoted the tweets that I did. People wanting this to be a left / right thing are missing the bigger picture. I will say that some leftists who challenged power absolutely did get censored and had their accounts and tweets limited in terms of discoverability by twitter.

The only way you'll get a full picture is to read through articles explaining what is noteworthy about it. Then read through the stuff criticizing it and pointing out all the huge issues with how its been curated and released and what elements they decided to focus on. Then think about it on your own and decide which parts you find convincing from the two viewpoints.

I'd strongly suggest reading the tweet threads themselves rather than relying on any given reporter, or even the different takes of several reporters. I guess it helps that I was interested in this, and I read threads as they were being released, so it didn't require much effort to see for myself.
 
Last edited:
Old twitter: We will take millions from the government to pay our employees who will censor jokes and satire in the name of saving you from misinformation. We will decide what truth is. We will ban people according to a highly subjective interpretation of our own vague rules, and then force them to say we were right to ban them before they are allowed back.* If we want to ban people who are not breaking the rules, we will make up a new rule so we can ban them. We will gaslight you as to what the definition of shadow banning is, so we can drastically reduce the voices of people we don't like, and claim that we're not doing so. We won't tell our CEO about any of this, or consult him much at all, because he actually believes we shouldn't be doing these things.

New twitter: We will introduce a new view count feature that is a little wonky and inaccurate. In fact, we'll do a lot of stupid things that we'll have to quickly undo, and that we shouldn't have done in the first place, but none of it will be of any lasting consequence.

Yeah, I'm going to have to go with the new one.

* Note that Musk under twitter still does this crap, and I'm still opposed to it.


And here's few words about the twitter files, where much of the above was confirmed after previously being speculation:




The Elon Jet scandal is as corrupt as it gets compared to old twitter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom