• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PS5 price to increase in select markets

coffinbirth

Member
You are conflating two different arguments into one.
giphy.gif

Ignored.
 
Last edited:

John Wick

Member
So then allow Russia to depose of the Ukrainian government without any repercussions? Hmmm, I wonder how that would turn out for Poland, Romania and the other former Soviet states once Russia sees that they have free-reign to do as they please.
You should keep politics out of console threads. The US is no better than Russia. Plenty of countries can bear witness to that. Just like Russia have no right in invading Ukraine the US has no right either.
If the US wanted peace they would have pressured Zelenski to negotiate a deal. Instead they are prolonging the war. End result is more civilians are being killed. Rather than seeking solutions the West want it to carry on while giving lip service.
 

John Wick

Member
do you know the profits of the whole of Sony as a company?

coarse I know what revenue and profits are, according to you guys Microsoft is loosing money because of gamepass but when we talk about Sony having profits and increasing price of the console its Sony need bigger profits and yes that is quoting you from earlier
It would take Sony 5 years to make the profit MS does in a year. So who is really over charging? The Xbox division is losing money.
 

Zathalus

Member
No, MS announced the price increase for the new gen.

In fact, I remember the conference clear as day since I was all in on Xbox back then. They announced $60 for third party (to cover the $10 licensing fees) and "swore" their first party would never be higher than $50... then Halo 3 happened and they raised their first party to $60 with that game going forward. Which a lot of us said would happen back then.

Why do you do this?
Do you have a source for this supposed 10$ licensing fee that forced third parties to increase prices?
 
You should keep politics out of console threads. The US is no better than Russia. Plenty of countries can bear witness to that. Just like Russia have no right in invading Ukraine the US has no right either.
If the US wanted peace they would have pressured Zelenski to negotiate a deal. Instead they are prolonging the war. End result is more civilians are being killed. Rather than seeking solutions the West want it to carry on while giving lip service.
You can't negotiate a deal with an aggressor state AFTER they have already annexed large swaths of your territory. Would you want the U.S. to negotiate a deal with China in a hypothetical war scenario AFTER they have already occupied and laid claim to California, Oregon, and Washington? It makes absolutely no sense.
 

HF2014

Member
Its 20$ cnd increase, why on earth is it panic mode in this thread? Is there some place the price went up higher?
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Nope, because he made it up. Hilarious thread, really.
You mean that MS let game makers make games for free, and never collect royalties ever? For the goodness of their hearts? That would be a first, since it has always been traditional for console manufacturers to collect royalties from publishers per game sales.
 

Zathalus

Member
You mean that MS let game makers make games for free, and never collect royalties ever? For the goodness of their hearts? That would be a first, since it has always been traditional for console manufacturers to collect royalties from publishers per game sales.
There is a difference between regular console royalties (that every console has) and a mythical extra 10$ licensing fee that you made up.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
microsoft had 10$ licensing fee for disc based games on 360?
I know patches cost a lot of money on 360. Or was it debunked?
I loved the 360. I still think it was the best gen ever
It was real, but it it wasn't only Microsoft. Sony and Nintendo did platform licensing, too. If the platform holder published the game the $10 didn't apply. But if Activision, EA, the developer, etc published they paid a platform license fee.

Pretty good article from when gaming journalism didn't suck.

 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
There is a difference between regular console royalties (that every console has) and a mythical extra 10$ licensing fee that you made up.
It's based on this. $10 on average was well known in gaming back at that time for the console manufacturer to get per unit sold.

It was real, but it it wasn't only Microsoft. Sony and Nintendo did platform licensing, too. If the platform holder published the game the $10 didn't apply. But if Activision, EA, the developer, etc published they paid a platform license fee.

Pretty good article from when gaming journalism didn't suck.

Reaction GIF
 
Last edited:

Zathalus

Member
It's based on this. $10 on average was well known in gaming back at that time for the console manufacturer to get per unit sold.
Yes, regular console royalties. The $60 price increased was pushed by third party publishers and if I recall correctly the excuse given at the time was increased development costs for HD games.

I don't recall a single source at the time stating that Microsoft royalties were so much higher over the previous gen that is was the reason for the increase.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Yes, regular console royalties. The $60 price increased was pushed by third party publishers and if I recall correctly the excuse given at the time was increased development costs for HD games.

I don't recall a single source at the time stating that Microsoft royalties were so much higher over the previous gen that is was the reason for the increase.
I never said it was "so much higher," I said it was one of the many reasons and excuses that was tossed around. That's factored into costs of development as well.
 
Last edited:

coffinbirth

Member
It was real, but it it wasn't only Microsoft. Sony and Nintendo did platform licensing, too. If the platform holder published the game the $10 didn't apply. But if Activision, EA, the developer, etc published they paid a platform license fee.

Pretty good article from when gaming journalism didn't suck.

[/URL]
This misinformation needs to stop.

There was NEVER a $10 flat licensing fee, FULL STOP. It is scaled for production numbers just like it has been since the NES days, sans minimum cart orders. You can dig around for sources and numbers, but you won't find a thing. Anecdotally, I know that Majesco had a $1 licensing fee for a particular title on 360, for reference. The big stink at the time was over title update fees being prohibitively expensive for indie devs....and Konami.

Just think about what you're saying...You believe Microsoft charged Activision, EA, 2K, Take 2 etc. $10 more to publish on 360 and then turned around and charged $10 less for their own games? That would've been suicide.
 

Zathalus

Member
This misinformation needs to stop.

There was NEVER a $10 flat licensing fee, FULL STOP. It is scaled for production numbers just like it has been since the NES days, sans minimum cart orders. You can dig around for sources and numbers, but you won't find a thing. Anecdotally, I know that Majesco had a $1 licensing fee for a particular title on 360, for reference. The big stink at the time was over title update fees being prohibitively expensive for indie devs....and Konami.

Just think about what you're saying...You believe Microsoft charged Activision, EA, 2K, Take 2 etc. $10 more to publish on 360 and then turned around and charged $10 less for their own games? That would've been suicide.
Especially when you consider when the 360 launched it was nowhere near being the market leader. Being the cause of a $10 price increase when actively trying its best to get market share would have been a really dumb move.
 

John Wick

Member
You can't negotiate a deal with an aggressor state AFTER they have already annexed large swaths of your territory. Would you want the U.S. to negotiate a deal with China in a hypothetical war scenario AFTER they have already occupied and laid claim to California, Oregon, and Washington? It makes absolutely no sense.
Your analogy is rubbish. The US and China are more evenly matched. Russia is going to take Ukraine sooner or later. So the end result is the same. The only difference is far more lives will be saved which is the most important part.
 

Reallink

Member
Gotta make back that 4 billion for Bungie somehow if the gaas skin factory doesn't work out. Hope people in affected countries buy Xboxes.
 
Last edited:
Your analogy is rubbish. The US and China are more evenly matched. Russia is going to take Ukraine sooner or later. So the end result is the same. The only difference is far more lives will be saved which is the most important part.
"Ukraine is small and should submit to it's larger and more aggressive neighbors". I sincerely hope that is not really your position. Sheesh, and I thought the world was fucked before.

It's a very fortunate thing most people in the 13 colonies didn't have your defeatist mindset back in the late 18th century, otherwise I'd be eating tea and crumpets for breakfast every day.
 
Last edited:

sachos

Member
Well Microsoft didn't drop the price of the series s and x but Sony just theoretically dropped it for them. Interested to see if Microsoft follow suit. Could be big if they don't.
Dude imagine in MS came out saying Series S is 250 and Series X is 450 just to fuck with Sony, technically they can eat the cost right?
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
The Xbox division is losing money.
Citation needed.

https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/6/2...tware-services-revenue-apple-epic-games-trial

“The gaming business is a profitable and high-growth business for Microsoft,” says a Microsoft spokesperson. “The console gaming business is traditionally a hardware subsidy model. Game companies sell consoles at a loss to attract new customers. Profits are generated in game sales and online service subscriptions.“
 
Gamers keep spending money like it's going out of fashion so why not? I hear people are struggling, cost of living soaring, business going bust yet most gamers have shifted to digital paying crazy amounts for new and older games.

Ratchet Clank Rift Apart is £70 on PSN still, you can get used copies on ebay for ~£20. It's possible to buy it, complete the game and get your money back easily but barely anyone wants save money.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
And to think Sony's gaming division has been banking record high profits past few years.

- $70 games
- $10 next gen upgrades
- PS Now (full feature set including PC streaming) is now a forced bundle within PS Premium, instead of previously where you can buy PS+ and PS Now separately
- Forcing PS5 gamers to buy Spiderman MM to get Spiderman Remastered. The news Spiderman Remastered would be a separate download soon after was scrapped
- High PC port prices or old games

Add: PS5 consoles increasing in price about 10% in many regions

Anything I miss?
 
Last edited:

Dolodolo

Member
And to think Sony's gaming division has been banking record high profits past few years.

- $70 games
- $10 next gen upgrades
- PS Now (full feature set including PC streaming) is now a forced bundle within PS Premium, instead of previously where you can buy PS+ and PS Now separately
- Forcing PS5 gamers to buy Spiderman MM to get Spiderman Remastered. The news Spiderman Remastered would be a separate download soon after was scrapped
- High PC port prices or old games

Add: PS5 consoles increasing in price about 10% in many regions

Anything I miss?
And what did you want to say with this post?
That Sony is an ordinary capitalist company that, being the market leader in home consoles, takes advantage of its position?
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Why don't they show the numbers? How much do they earn per quarter?
What's the problem with this?
Apple is super profitable. They don't disclose profits per product line either. All their Macs, iPhones, tablets and watches get their profits bundled into a vague profit line.

So going by that, Apple is unprofitable since they dont want to disclose exact profits per product?
 
Last edited:

DaGwaphics

Member
This is hilarious. If MS do an advertisement about how they're not raising prices then I'm dead.

They could run ads in the effected markets about still only being priced at X.

Imagine if companies marketed like politicians, I can see some of those B&W ads with the heavy voice over talking about Sony's record profits and this price increase. :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 

Dolodolo

Member
Apple is super profitable. They don't disclose profits per product line either. All their Macs, iPhones, tablets and watches get their profits bundled into a vague profit line.

So going by that, Apple is unprofitable since they dont want to disclose exact profits per product?

How much profit did they lose in the last quarter, with a 7% decline in revenue?
 

fallingdove

Member
They were breaking even at launch. Costs go down every year. The $250 Nvme SSDs in 2020 are now going for $100. Sony orders in bulk and in two years since launch, they have reduced the BOM and should be making money on each PS5 sold.
You don’t think chip shortage, supply chain, and global inflation had any impact on on profitability? I imagine they were having to pay a premium for these components in order to produce PS5s with some consistency.

This doesn’t track as some sort of greed related price hike.
 
Top Bottom