SupremeHoodie
Member
That’s ps5.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Leyasu
Banned
Series S flawless 60fps except for the parametric camera option where there is bigger dips.
Seires X has single frame drops plus bigger dips in parametric camera option.
I just watched that part of the video.. Looks like they got to where they could for launch and pushed it out. Nothing that a patch couldn't remove.
Seires X has single frame drops plus bigger dips in parametric camera option.
I just watched that part of the video.. Looks like they got to where they could for launch and pushed it out. Nothing that a patch couldn't remove.
Romulus
Member
Curry looks more realistic on Xbox. MJ looks like a plastic action figure on both. DF not critiqueing the ps5 version because they’re scared of sonygaf.
The lighting looks different for one so the comparison is not like for like. Its invalid. We don't know what quarter it is or anything. We do know when DF showed them back to back that they looked the same though. But DF are Sony trolls right? Just this year though, not last year when they were xbox trolls, showing the X1X wiping the floor with ps4 pro over and over. They weren't "afraid" of sonyGAF back then right?
Last edited:
ChuckeRearmed
Member
It seems XSX has some issues with alpha effects (not for the first time). I guess that one of the problems with the current GDK.
Last edited:
Coulomb_Barrier
Member
DForce
NaughtyDog Defense Force
Romulus
Member
I just saw the video on DF back to back. Its 99% the same. I could care less what some guy posted, he could have posted anything, before a patch, different arenas, anything.
John Wick
Member
Exactly genius but it's explained in the video where it's taken from and why it's at that frame rate.
Perfectly illustrates fangirls jumping the gun.
SupremeHoodie
Member
Perfectly illustrates selective outrage.
SupremeHoodie
Member
Df video doesn’t show a detailed side by side like that other video so you can choose to ignore facts.
Romulus
Member
I mean you're the one clinging on to some guys post weeks back versus digital foundary. You're basically calling DF fake or biased to secure this "win."
DF is suddenly biased when weeks ago they were depicting X1X crushing ps4 pro. Lol.
ethomaz
Banned
That just show PS5 has more horse power to run them... it is even sweat less like expected from the world most powerful console.
Last edited:
Md Ray
Member
Or... The scene is fillrate bound and Series X is struggling more because XSX GPU has 18% less pixel fillrate throughput than PS5 GPU among with triangle rasterization, etc. XSX simply needs a resolution drop through dynamic res scaler here as the processing of final pixel values is dependent on ROPs/pixel fillrate.
Last edited:
Tiptop10
Neo Member
xGonGiveItToYa
Coolwhhip
Neophyte
Someone edit this with Switch on 1, PS5 on 2 and XboxSerxxsxs on 3. Or PC on 1 if it's about graphics.
Last edited:
ethomaz
Banned
I thought we were ahead the denial phase already lol
retsof624
Member
Well at least he didn’t say they will play best
SupremeHoodie
Member
Leyasu
Banned
Could be. But then then the series S has the same problems with the same camera angle.
Gotta say it though, in all my years of visiting gaming forums, I never heard "fillrate bound". I suppose that each new gen brings new things.. XsX maxed out already at launch. Gonna be the first gen where each succesive year of software gets notably worse instead of better.
Last edited:
reinking
Gold Member
You guys taking shots. Remember when Xbox guys were doing it? I know some of it is good fun but be prepared to eat some Crow when XB wins one of these. I just hope it is not Cyberpunk because that is going to give them a ginormous epeen and they will never shut up about it.
Black_Stride
do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
Everyone uses the parametric camera?
For what?
Next you are gonna tell me everyone plays COD puts their FOV as low as possible so they can focus on the one target infront of them at any time
Agnostic2020
Member
Facts ? U r really delusional it seems.This video was posted a month ago to begin with . If it is to believe it was correct , it is not the case anymore. He mentioned games run on exact same setting .
Last edited:
Md Ray
Member
Series S seems to do a bit better than Series X because the res is very low 1080p (compared to native 4K). Hence the "GPU related drops" on XSX.
Mr Moose
Member
PS5 beating Series X without even breaking a sweat, nice.
Don't use that guys videos, he's always wrong.
Edit: I might be thinking of another guy, who uses the same graphics on their videos.
Last edited:
You might want to check your tag while in DF threads ribbing people.
Leyasu
Banned
Yeah it doesn't have the same 1fps dip in normal play. But I was talking about the other camera angle
Last edited:
SupremeHoodie
Member
Why would it not be the case anymore? There hasn’t been some huge update patch on the consoles for graphical fidelity for this game.
Last edited:
Zadom
Member
ethomaz
Banned
Wut?
I know how the DF threaded the PS5 reveal.
Now they are just reaping what they planted.
They were basically a MS marketing tool but hey you can't do that anymore if your game can't show that.
Even so they are very late with game comparisons.
Last edited:
Dibils2k
Member
Pro using last gen visuals...Summary:
NBA 2K21 brings a huge leap in realism for next-gen consoles
It's been a long time since we've covered sports titles at Digital Foundry, but with the arrival of NBA 2K21 on the new…www.eurogamer.net
PS4 Pro at native 4K and Series S at native 1080p....
Last edited:
Md Ray
Member
I know you were talking about the parametric camera angle. Series X has slightly more inconsistent fps dips than Series S due to it rendering 4x more pixels than S. The X just needs to scale down res below PS5 to clean up those fps drops.
Oh wow those color differences are real. And the sweat shader on Curry is far more noticeable on XSX.
Leyasu
Banned
What you don't think that the devs could have removed them? Especially as they are present on both consoles XsX and XsS. Which would imply more of something on their end (the devs) as opposed to "pixel fillrate" No? A bug or a little bit of extra optimisation..
Agnostic2020
Member
Oh I see u r in denial phase of grief. Ps5 is just slightly better . It is what it is .hopefully u get to acceptance soon.
a single frame advantage (rare) at the same price without gamepass ..incredible !
Last edited:
Neo Blaster
Member
DForce
NaughtyDog Defense Force
Sweat is dynamic.
The more the player is fatigued, the more the player is going to sweat.
Curry has more sweat on his face in your comparison video. There's also more examples in this video.
Md Ray
Member
I'm seeing a pattern here. In multiple games now that have the same resolution on both, PS5 performs ever so slightly better. I don't think every game is bugged. In AssCreed when the resolution is similar (1440p) on both, XSX performed worse than PS5. XSX required an aggressive res scaler to clean up those fps dips. Pixel fillrate on XSX: 116 Gpix/s, PS5: 142.7 Gpix/s. As I said, the unit inside the GPU that handles the final pixel values is clearly much faster in PS5. There are other units like the vector ALU and TMUs that are faster in XSX.
Last edited:
HAL-01
Member
It’s called “comparison was made at two different points in the game”. He obviously got footage from the ps5 first, then had to wait on the Xbox for curry to make a similar face so they could be somewhat comparable. It’s not rocket surgery
Captain Toad
Banned
This is reminding me of PS3 vs 360 where PS3 was clearly the more powerful hardware in theory, but in practice, the results were usually flipped for a variety of reasons.
Captain Toad
Banned
"Just don't use certain in-game camera angles."?
That reminds me of, "Just sit further away from the TV."
