• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vroadstar

Gold Member
Man how did this post even warrant a "LOL"?? @Doncabesa

jDfN22U.jpg

Surprise!!

UsZlrHU.png
 

ruvikx

Banned
I'm more surprised that Sony would go ahead on this sort of release strategy for such a big game knowing it would lead to this kind of backlash.

Right now they seem to be providing Microsoft with a tonne of free ammo that they will use against them! Sure they have a huge lead going into next-gen but we're already seeing signs on the gaming forums some are getting tetchy with Sony. Microsoft are also courting the game media and YouTube influencers hard while in the meantime Sony have almost completely retracted from engaging with them so far.

In any case it looks like even if I want PS5 I probably won't get one until after launch as it stands so I'll just observe how this plays out for the next few weeks.

I'm an entirely selfish gamer. I don't care about supporting one particular manufacturer over another, I just care about the here & now. The way I see it is Sony has the one game I can see I'll enjoy (a lot) in the initial six month release window of these consoles, aka Demon Souls remake. I've also been curious to finally get Death Stranding as well (which I hope will have backwards compatibility which takes advantage of the ps pro version, not the base ps4 version).

But, I can also see that down the line Sony has two huge problems: their games are too expensive versus gamepass (80 euros in Europe is a bit comical), and when stuff like The Elder Scrolls VI & Fallout 5 land (& other regular zenimax stuff like Doom, Rage, Prey, Dishonored etc.) & those games are Xbox/PC exclusive (& on Gamepass). Well, oops. Not good for Sony.

Especially in this economy.
 
Last edited:

Rea

Member
No Sony has said all games they publish will have that logo on it.
No dude, PS Studio Logo represents all the 1st party studios at Sony's Playstation brand just like Xbox games studio. When a game has it, means that game is made by 1st party studio from Playstation brand and it's exclusive for Playstation. Demon soul's remake has it probably because of involvement of Japan Studios which is 1st party and bluepoint is 2nd party just like Insomniac before Sony acquire them. I'm 99% sure, if demon souls Ps5 sell well, Sony will acquire Bluepoint just like Insomniac.
 

kyliethicc

Member
No dude, PS Studio Logo represents all the 1st party studios at Sony's Playstation brand just like Xbox games studio. When a game has it, means that game is made by 1st party studio from Playstation brand and it's exclusive for Playstation. Demon soul's remake has it probably because of involvement of Japan Studios which is 1st party and bluepoint is 2nd party just like Insomniac before Sony acquire them. I'm 99% sure, if demon souls Ps5 sell well, Sony will acquire Bluepoint just like Insomniac.
No. Sony will use that logo for any game they publish. Thats what 1st party means.
Sony owns the game, funds it, publishes it. Its theirs. Everything else is 3rd party.

"Alongside games developed by Sony's first-party studios -- such as Naughty Dog, Insomniac, Santa Monica Studio, Media Molecule and Guerrilla Games -- the PlayStation Studios brand will also apply to games made by work-for-hire developers under Sony's direction."

""If our studios are managing the production of these games and working with an external developer, it will still come out under the PlayStation Studios brand," Lempel details. "It doesn't mean that we outright own the developer, but it just means we brought it up as a first-party. In a lot of cases we don't own the developer." - Eric Lempel, SIE"




Also, 2nd party doesn't really exist, according to devs like Insomniac.

MxsUsJz.jpg
 
Last edited:

Redlight

Member
No. Sony will use that logo for any game they publish. Thats what 1st party means.
Sony owns the game, funds it, publishes it. Its theirs. Everything else is 3rd party.

"Alongside games developed by Sony's first-party studios -- such as Naughty Dog, Insomniac, Santa Monica Studio, Media Molecule and Guerrilla Games -- the PlayStation Studios brand will also apply to games made by work-for-hire developers under Sony's direction."

""If our studios are managing the production of these games and working with an external developer, it will still come out under the PlayStation Studios brand," Lempel details. "It doesn't mean that we outright own the developer, but it just means we brought it up as a first-party. In a lot of cases we don't own the developer." - Eric Lempel, SIE"




Also, 2nd party doesn't really exist, according to devs like Insomniac.

MxsUsJz.jpg
I still think 'second party' is a handy description. We all know it means a third-party studio making a game exclusive to one platform, it's the only term that describes that situation in a simple and transparent way.
 

kyliethicc

Member
I still think 'second party' is a handy description. We all know it means a third-party studio making a game exclusive to one platform, it's the only term that describes that situation in a simple and transparent way.
It means nothing really. People overcomplicate the matter and focus on devs too much.

The developers aren't the "party," its the publisher.

The publisher pays for the game, the publisher owns, controls, and markets the game. They set the price, etc.

1st party game = same publisher as hardware maker. (Sony, Nintendo, Xbox)
3rd party game = everything else

1st party PS4/5 games are published by Sony Interactive Entertainment.
1st party Xbox games are published by Xbox Game Studios.
1st party Switch games are published by Nintendo.

Everything else (even say Minecraft published by Xbox on PS4, or soon to be MLB The Show published by SIE on Xbox) is 3rd party.
 
Last edited:

Bojanglez

The Amiga Brotherhood
No dude, PS Studio Logo represents all the 1st party studios at Sony's Playstation brand just like Xbox games studio. When a game has it, means that game is made by 1st party studio from Playstation brand and it's exclusive for Playstation. Demon soul's remake has it probably because of involvement of Japan Studios which is 1st party and bluepoint is 2nd party just like Insomniac before Sony acquire them. I'm 99% sure, if demon souls Ps5 sell well, Sony will acquire Bluepoint just like Insomniac.

No. Insomniac's Sunset Overdrive was under the Microsoft Studios (now Xbox Game Studios) banner.
320x320.webp


I'm pretty sure these are publishing related, not Dev team.
 

Rea

Member
No. Sony will use that logo for any game they publish. Thats what 1st party means.
Sony owns the game, funds it, publishes it. Its theirs. Everything else is 3rd party.

"Alongside games developed by Sony's first-party studios -- such as Naughty Dog, Insomniac, Santa Monica Studio, Media Molecule and Guerrilla Games -- the PlayStation Studios brand will also apply to games made by work-for-hire developers under Sony's direction."

""If our studios are managing the production of these games and working with an external developer, it will still come out under the PlayStation Studios brand," Lempel details. "It doesn't mean that we outright own the developer, but it just means we brought it up as a first-party. In a lot of cases we don't own the developer." - Eric Lempel, SIE"




Also, 2nd party doesn't really exist, according to devs like Insomniac.

MxsUsJz.jpg
Yes, it's also represents the 1st party studio. For the 2nd party, i understood what's the meaning, it's technically doesn't exist but it's meaning the same.
 

kyliethicc

Member
No. Insomniac's Sunset Overdrive was under the Microsoft Studios (now Xbox Game Studios) banner.
320x320.webp


I'm pretty sure these are publishing related, not Dev team.
Exactly. Developers do not make consoles. 1st/3rd party refers to the publisher and the platform holder (console maker.)

Sunset Overdrive was a 1st party Xbox One game. Published by Microsoft.
Spider-Man was a 1st party PS4 game. Published by Sony.

Both developed by Insomniac.
 
Last edited:

Zero707

If I carry on trolling, report me.
Will never happen. Seagate only forever. Thats how proprietary storage works. Its designed to have no competition so the price never has to drop.
Nah i think xbox talked about allowing other manufacturers in the future to make these SSD for Xbox.

then Again this is also up to the manufacturers to make these SSDs or Not

MS is using unpopular Form factor M.2 2230 Nvme SSD as far i know only toshiba make these type of SSDs


NtWnEbL.jpg
NtWnEbL.jpg
 
Last edited:

Zero707

If I carry on trolling, report me.

"Seagate will be the exclusive launch partner for these expansion cards, too. “At launch, the Seagate Storage Expansion Card for Xbox Series X will be the only Expansion Card available,” reveals a Microsoft spokesperson to The Verge. “We look forward to sharing more details in the future.” It’s not clear whether Microsoft will have its own branded expansion cards or just how many other third-party drive makers will be able to create expansion cards."
 
Last edited:

kyliethicc

Member

"Seagate will be the exclusive launch partner for these expansion cards, too. “At launch, the Seagate Storage Expansion Card for Xbox Series X will be the only Expansion Card available,” reveals a Microsoft spokesperson to The Verge. “We look forward to sharing more details in the future.” It’s not clear whether Microsoft will have its own branded expansion cards or just how many other third-party drive makers will be able to create expansion cards."
Ehh, don't get your hopes up. But thanks for the source.

I doubt Seagate would bother accepting the deal without being given the manufacturing exclusivity by Xbox.
 

Zero707

If I carry on trolling, report me.
I think creating Adapter or external shell for third party SSDs is easiest solution but the problem here is the cooling these Third party SSDs will get hot
 
Last edited:

kyliethicc

Member
I think creating Adapter or external shell for third party SSDs is easiest solution but the problem here is the cooling these Third party SSDs will get hot
I doubt the Xbox OS would let them work. They can disable any other drives being accepted via the system software. It'll be the 1 card slot, and only Seagate cards, or the internal. Until/unless Xbox change their minds.

PS4 didn't even allow external USB HDDs until 2016. They patched the OS.

Like how for years, iOS blocked file transfers from flash drives. Then eventually Apple changed their mind and updated the software, allowing it.
 

kyliethicc

Member
Worth noting that the Pro models are the enterprise versions, so should be priced higher than the Evo model.
Actually the new 980 Pro uses the same type of NAND flash as the 970 Evo, and has the same write endurance ratings. They "downgraded" to cut costs by $120.

Speculation is there might not be a 980 Evo. But we shall see. If there is a 980 Evo, and its slower, then it might not be fast enough for the PS5.
 

Redlight

Member
It means nothing really. People overcomplicate the matter and focus on devs too much.

The developers aren't the "party," its the publisher.

The publisher pays for the game, the publisher owns, controls, and markets the game. They set the price, etc.

1st party game = same publisher as hardware maker. (Sony, Nintendo, Xbox)
3rd party game = everything else

1st party PS4/5 games are published by Sony Interactive Entertainment.
1st party Xbox games are published by Xbox Game Studios.
1st party Switch games are published by Nintendo.

Everything else (even say Minecraft published by Xbox on PS4, or soon to be MLB The Show published by SIE on Xbox) is 3rd party.
I think gamers, quite rightly, are more interested in the developer than the publisher.

1) Platform Owned Developer - First Party
2) Independent Developer working on exclusive game - Second Party
3) Independent Developer working on wide release - Third Party

Each of those situations is unique, the term 'third-party' doesn't accurately describe both 2 and 3. Removing the term 'second-party' only serves to remove clarity and has zero benefit.
 

kyliethicc

Member
I think gamers, quite rightly, are more interested in the developer than the publisher.

1) Platform Owned Developer - First Party
2) Independent Developer working on exclusive game - Second Party
3) Independent Developer working on wide release - Third Party

Each of those situations is unique, the term 'third-party' doesn't accurately describe both 2 and 3. Removing the term 'second-party' only serves to remove clarity and has zero benefit.
Cool but thats made up by you. The terms in the industry actually refer to publisher. Real game developers say so.

hPIJ4tr.jpg
 
Last edited:

Zero707

If I carry on trolling, report me.
USE Cold Storage if you don't have a spare arm and leg lying around.
you can wait for 15 minutes - 20 minutes for games transfer, make it your bathroom break.
 
Last edited:

MastaKiiLA

Member
Actually the new 980 Pro uses the same type of NAND flash as the 970 Evo, and has the same write endurance ratings. They "downgraded" to cut costs by $120.

Speculation is there might not be a 980 Evo. But we shall see. If there is a 980 Evo, and its slower, then it might not be fast enough for the PS5.
Huh. I did not know that. I've bought 3 Evos, and always steered clear of the Pros. The 970 Evo Plus has excellent performance parity with the Pro model, but worse warranty and drive life. If they're using the same flash chips in the 980, then gains must be on the controller side. Impressive, if so. Also, I wonder if they figured the write life of the 970 NAND is plenty good enough for servers. 18TB written in the past year, and probably haven't made a dent in the life of the drive. Hopefully a 980 Evo Plus can have the same parity as the 970s.
 

kyliethicc

Member
Huh. I did not know that. I've bought 3 Evos, and always steered clear of the Pros. The 970 Evo Plus has excellent performance parity with the Pro model, but worse warranty and drive life. If they're using the same flash chips in the 980, then gains must be on the controller side. Impressive, if so. Also, I wonder if they figured the write life of the 970 NAND is plenty good enough for servers. 18TB written in the past year, and probably haven't made a dent in the life of the drive. Hopefully a 980 Evo Plus can have the same parity as the 970s.
The 1 TB 980 Pro is rated for 600 TB written. I guess the 970 Pro was 1200 TB. But the 1 TB 970 Pro launched at $350, while the 980 Pro 1 TB is only $230 but 7 GB/s. Seems well worth it. Has a 5 year warranty, should be great for PS5 expansion.

It does have its own custom controller, ARM chip Samsung 8nm. It uses TLC NAND like the 970 Evo.

In depth review article here

 
Last edited:

Redlight

Member
Cool but thats made up by you. The terms in the industry actually refer to publisher. Real game developers say so.

hPIJ4tr.jpg
I made up the term 'second party'?

Sure, OK. I'll take credit for it then. Think of me whenever someone uses it*.

The term is both very widely used and understood which is why Greg Miller used it in your example. I really don't care if developers use it, it's a term that's helpful in describing the relationship between developer and platform holder for any particular game.





*Pro tip, you'll be thinking of me a lot.
 

kyliethicc

Member
I made up the term 'second party'?

Sure, OK. I'll take credit for it then. Think of me whenever someone uses it*.

The term is both very widely used and understood which is why Greg Miller used it in your example. I really don't care if developers use it, it's a term that's helpful in describing the relationship between developer and platform holder for any particular game.





*Pro tip, you'll be thinking of me a lot.
Cool. The point is any game Sony publishes is 1st party. They treat them all the same. Doesn't matter if its God of War or Bloodborne. Both are Sony 1st party games. They just don't own From Software. But they own Bloodborne, same as God of War.

Thats why you'll see PlayStation Studios logo for all games Sony publishes. They're all 1st party PS5 games.

Sony will use the PS Studios logo on all 1st party PS5 games as a seal of quality, building brand trust with buyers. Doesn't matter if its Destruction Allstars, Demon's Souls, or Miles Morales. All the same logo on the box. They don't want to communicate to buyers "we own or don't own this developer" they want to communicate to the buyer "this is a PlayStation game." Thats the point of the logo, the branding, and the idea of 1st party vs 3rd party.

If you use the term 2nd party, I obviously understand what you mean, but its a distinction without a difference for how the game is treated and made, really.
 
Last edited:

zaitsu

Banned
My friend told my that Zenimax being bought by MS was kept secret, and Sony probably didn't know before us. God imagine those talks. They wanted to buy Starfield exclusivity and MS bought whole company right in front of them. I really think that wise people (not Jim) has now reevaluating strategy. Xbox has been greenlighted to waste huge amount of money just to look more pro consumer with free "smart delivery" - its free even if its only higher fps and resolutions ( spiderman remaster is much more than that thats why you need to pay for it ).

In short term own PS mistakes has more impact than Zenimax being taken by MS. But clearly zenimax was important part of 3party Sony strategy - we are getting two timed exclusives from them and they wanted to secure Starfield.

So MS really will keep PS in check this generation. And that's good for us. Worst case scenario we would also buy XSX in 2023. But strong competition will make Sony better for free.
 

Rea

Member
No. Insomniac's Sunset Overdrive was under the Microsoft Studios (now Xbox Game Studios) banner.
320x320.webp


I'm pretty sure these are publishing related, not Dev team.
Yes you are correct, but there is still involvement of studios owned by the publisher, for example like Quality control, equipment supports, games engine etc. Doesn't necessarily means xbox or Sony just only publish.
Edit: in case of Sony, previously about before 2020, Sony doesn't have PS Studio logo. That's why GOT and Last of Us don't have the Logo. They just recently decided to do like Xbox Game Studio logo. In other words, they copied xbox. LoL
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom