If you're asking for a female Link, you are huh
Is it better or worse than Miyamoto putting Zelda on the backburner?
Why do you want iconic game characters replaced? Do you want Harry Potter to become Mary Potter, James Bond to become Jane Bond, Super Mario to become Super Mariana? What's the problem with creating new series or spinoffs instead of replacing the protagonists?
And I'm even acknowledging that a Link with some kind of disability could bring some interesting gameplay and story elements, whereas I have trouble seeing how a female Link would change much.
It's funny how Miyamoto can't consider the idea of a female link. It's literally inconceivable to him.
It's funny how Miyamoto can't consider the idea of a female link. It's literally inconceivable to him.
What were the ramifications of Thor being a woman?
It's funny how Miyamoto can't consider the idea of a female link. It's literally inconceivable to him.
What did Wind Waker being cel-shaded change?
Comic books have had this happen to? What were the ramifications of Thor being a woman?
Nintendo makes the world and the lore, they decided how the reincarnation works, so there's nothing to debate over whether or not it makes sense.
It's funny how Miyamoto can't consider the idea of a female link. It's literally inconceivable to him.
Ugh...
"Plenty" just means a sizable amount, it doesn't specify if it's the larger or smaller amount.
Also
considering Aonuma said he talked to his team and they decided that Zelda would be the simplest option for a female character, it's not that much of stretch to extrapolate from that that the team prefers the idea or rather considers the idea of playing as Zelda as more viable.
Likewise, nothing truly matters if we want to get metaphysical so I don't see why we're still talking about this. No one has provided a valid reason why it should happen though which makes it seem like something that within the context of the series, that isn't necessary. Simiarly explain to what would be fundamentally wrong with Samus being turned into Sam Aran via Chozo magic.
So far? You and others wrongly expecting that the same situation would certainly occur in other specific mediums and character situations.
He created the character.
He has more say than anyone else on this earth. I'm flabbergasted how people on the internet seem to think they have a god given right to demand these things.
Those people's opinions matter, but in my eyes, the people who have been supporting the series since day one, the people that like Link, the people, the male, female, trans, and so many more types of fans that made the Link amiibo the best selling amiibo in the us for three years straight matter more, as they have something to lose in this. The people who want to change Link don't have anything to lose. Still a batgirl like character, Linkle, or a similar compromise that isn't a gender select as Link is a character wouldn't hurt.So if plenty of people want male Link that's reason enough to keep him male, but if plenty of people want a female Link it doesn't matter since it's not necessary? Do I have that right or am I missing something?
I can also extrapolate from my personal experience with corporate culture and assume that no one would want to directly contradict something a superior said and that any comments that come from the team through management should be taken with a huge grain of salt.
Didn't mean to get metaphysical, just curious as to why you're so opinionated on something that really doesn't have any effect on you. If it doesn't matter if Link is a girl why are you spending so much time defending the decision to keep him male?
Who are you guys to tell a creator of a character in game what that char should look like?
I feel like this forum is falling apart, maybe do a new subforum for political things in a game? Let games be games.
Sadly many would love that.Who are you guys to tell a creator of a character in game what that char should look like?
I feel like this forum is falling apart, maybe do a new subforum for political things in a game? Let games be games.
It's hard to understand because your reasons don't make any sense.Those people's opinions matter, but in my eyes, the people who have been supporting the series since day one, the people that like Link, the people, the male, female, trans, and so many more types of fans that made the Link amiibo the best selling amiibo in the us for three years straight matter more, as they have something to lose in this. The people who want to change Link don't have anything to lose. Still a batgirl like character, Linkle, or a similar compromise that isn't a gender select as Link is a character wouldn't hurt.
Also, it matters to me as I like Link, I don't want him changed. I don't want a fem Mario and I don't want a male Judy Hopps, that's all there is to my stance, I don't get why that's hard to understand.
That'd be a pretty boring forum if people weren't allowed to express any discontent with anything.
Or would grievances that you agree with be allowed?
Sadly many would love that.
Critical thought is for some reason detested in gaming.
I think a Tetra game could work. Shes one of the few Zeldas that does stuff while Link is saving the world/Hyrule.
Plus shes cooler then Sheik
That'd be a pretty boring forum if people weren't allowed to express any discontent with anything.
Or would grievances that you agree with be allowed?
It's hard to understand because your reasons don't make any sense.
We know that ... which is why we are asking for a FEMALE REINCARNATION OF LINK, THE OWNER OF THE TRIFORCE not Zelda as the protagonist
Those people's opinions matter, but in my eyes, the people who have been supporting the series since day one, the people that like Link, the people, the male, female, trans, and so many more types of fans that made the Link amiibo the best selling amiibo in the us for three years straight matter more, as they have something to lose in this. The people who want to change Link don't have anything to lose. Still a batgirl like character, Linkle, or a similar compromise that isn't a gender select as Link is a character wouldn't hurt.
Also, it matters to me as I like Link, I don't want him changed. I don't want a fem Mario and I don't want a male Judy Hopps, that's all there is to my stance, I don't get why that's hard to understand.
You're discontent with a game because the creator doesn't want to change the main character that they've had for 30 years?
Sheik would probably have all the gameplay designed around the fact that they're pretty much a magical ninja.
Would be interesting to see Nintendo tackle that type of game.
This thread should be about the cool possibilities of a Sheik game,
instead it's back to changing a character that Nintendo doesn't want to change.
...a character they like would be changed. How is that hard to understand? The series staying the same doesn't change a 30 year old character, the opposite does. It's a simple point.What does anyone have to lose? That's what I don't understand. Your post reads like satire to me. "They have something to lose in this." And what is that, exactly?
I feel like we keep getting off the same page because people on both sides are lumping all of the other sides opinion together and putting words in each others' mouths, but I agree that a Zelda-focused game or a game with Linkle or some other character would be equivalent to a female Link. If people specifically want a female Link and wouldn't be satisfied with anything else, I agree that that's ridiculous.
But the reason I specify "female Link" in my posts is because that's what I would want it to feel like. A Legend of Zelda game with a female lead. Not a handheld game, not a spinoff with different gameplay, but a proper, mainline Zelda with a playable woman.
And just for the record I can't wait to play Breath of the Wild, and the main character's gender will never be a deciding factor for whether or not I'll play a Zelda game. I do think that a female character could be a cool breath of air depending on how it's handled though (for example the idea someone posted of the main character being a Gerudo with Ganon still being the only remaining male could be really interesting), and I truly fail to see why anyone is getting defensive over the idea.
...a character they like would be changed. How is that hard to understand? The series staying the same doesn't change a 30 year old character, the opposite does. It's a simple point.
... So what? How does that affect them? If I move to a new home I have something to lose because I may miss my old home. If I play games all night instead of studying I have something to lose because I may compromise my future prospects. If I fall in love I have something to lose because the feelings may not be mutual, or may change over time.
What do I have to lose if a game character is a girl?
... So what? How does that affect them? If I move to a new home I have something to lose because I may miss my old home. If I play games all night instead of studying I have something to lose because I may compromise my future prospects. If I fall in love I have something to lose because the feelings may not be mutual, or may change over time.
What do I have to lose if a game character is a girl?
That opens a different can of worms. Link has moved far beyond a player character and is likely not even namable in this game. Giving the player agency over his design is like giving the player agency over Marios design.Not to mention, most people wanting this just want it as a mere option. No one is getting replaced.
That'd be a pretty boring forum if people weren't allowed to express any discontent with anything.
Or would grievances that you agree with be allowed?
What does anyone have to lose? That's what I don't understand. Your post reads like satire to me. "They have something to lose in this." And what is that, exactly?
.
:l
Brah, stop reading in-between the lines. This is a thirty year old character that people have literally grown up with. Him being changed won't cause anyone to have a stroke but it does and could effect people. Just because it wouldn't effect them to the utmost extreme doesn't mean the opinions and feelings of those who prefer Link stay the way he is should go unheard.
What does anyone have to lose? That's what I don't understand. Your post reads like satire to me. "They have something to lose in this." And what is that, exactly?
I feel like we keep getting off the same page because people on both sides are lumping all of the other sides opinion together and putting words in each others' mouths, but I agree that a Zelda-focused game or a game with Linkle or some other character would be equivalent to a female Link. If people specifically want a female Link and wouldn't be satisfied with anything else, I agree that that's ridiculous.
But the reason I specify "female Link" in my posts is because that's what I would want it to feel like. A Legend of Zelda game with a female lead. Not a handheld game, not a spinoff with different gameplay, but a proper, mainline Zelda with a playable woman.
And just for the record I can't wait to play Breath of the Wild, and the main character's gender will never be a deciding factor for whether or not I'll play a Zelda game. I do think that a female character could be a cool breath of air depending on how it's handled though (for example the idea someone posted of the main character being a Gerudo with Ganon still being the only remaining male could be really interesting), and I truly fail to see why anyone is getting defensive over the idea.
I will patiently wait for Zelda to be the hero of her namesake series. Nintendo doesn't need my money and I don't need their tired design staples.
So to what extent would it effect them? I don't get your point.
We can't make this change! It would effect people!
But don't be ridiculous, it wouldn't REALLY effect them.
It would effect them just enough that Link should always be male, but at the same time isn't really that big a deal in the grand scheme of things. If only it affected people slightly less, we wouldn't have this huge argument about the whole thing.
Miyamoto's active hostility towards growing or evolving Nintendo IPs continue.
...
Sometimes I feel like the only changes are made in spite of his efforts.
I will patiently wait for Zelda to be the hero of her namesake series. Nintendo doesn't need my money and I don't need their tired design staples.
I absolutely do not understand this way of thinking. The new Zelda looks to be the freshest and most original game in the series yet, and you are avoiding it because Zelda isn't playable or Link isn't a girl?
Your loss.
People wouldn't fall over and die if Sam Aran was a thing either you know. That's not a justification of such a change though.
How would a female Link bring a fresh breath? Because before I read that Link is just an avatar who doesn't speak. With the Gerudo thing I could see at least the gameplay change, but with a female Link all I see is a cosmetic change, just because a vocal minority suddenly demands it in a "I want red to be called green" manner. But what's the relation between a female Link and a German as a main character?
Though I also don't see how anyone has anything to lose if Link was to become female. I just don't see any reasons for a change apart from gender agenda.
I would rather see a completely new Zelda spinoff with a proper female lead instead of just changing an established character. With a proper budget and all.
I'm still angry I cannot play as Metroid in the respective titles. Damn those ignorant people at Nintendo.
Why does the change need justification? Again, what was the justification of cel-shading since you believe justifications are necessary?
Oh wait, cel-shading doesn't count because you don't personally have an issue with that. Only stylistic changes you personally don't appreciate get that level of scrutiny.
Why does the change need justification? Again, what was the justification of cel-shading since you believe justifications are necessary?
Oh wait, cel-shading doesn't count because you don't personally have an issue with that. Only stylistic changes you personally don't appreciate get that level of scrutiny.
Miyamoto's active hostility towards growing or evolving Nintendo IPs continue.
...
Sometimes I feel like the only changes are made in spite of his efforts.
I will patiently wait for Zelda to be the hero of her namesake series. Nintendo doesn't need my money and I don't need their tired design staples.
Why does the change need justification? Again, what was the justification of cel-shading since you believe justifications are necessary?
Oh wait, cel-shading doesn't count because you don't personally have an issue with that. Only stylistic changes you personally don't appreciate get that level of scrutiny.
I strongly disagree with your revisionist assessment of the Metroid series.
Link is a male and will always be the Hero of time. The creator of Zelda, the president of Nintendo, and almost everyone involved with the series has spoken on it. Give it up. Link has 30+ years now as a male and his story is interconnected.
You can keep asking but at this point it honestly feels like pissing in the wind.
That opens a different can of worms. Link has moved far beyond a player character and is likely not even namable in this game. Giving the player agency over his design is like giving the player agency over Marios design.
Why does the change need justification? Again, what was the justification of cel-shading since you believe justifications are necessary?
Oh wait, cel-shading doesn't count because you don't personally have an issue with that. Only stylistic changes you personally don't appreciate get that level of scrutiny.
Except for that time there was a real world one and one made of paper running around together.It doesn't open any can of worms, you enjoy the male Link and the canon you choose, while others will play as female Link. You won't be affected.
Again, Mario is always the same Mario, not comparable.
It doesn't open any can of worms, you enjoy the male Link and the canon you choose, while others will play as female Link. You won't be affected.
Again, Mario is always the same Mario.