James Scott
Banned
Miyamoto keeps name dropping that Sheik game, seems very likely to happen.
I'd like to see it.
I'd like to see it.
We know that ... which is why we are asking for a FEMALE REINCARNATION OF LINK, THE OWNER OF THE TRIFORCE not Zelda as the protagonist
Yeah, not in a mainline game. Since that's what most asking for playable Zelda mean. Fairly certain no one's asking for Zelda's Mean Bean Machine, though there are those who would be satisfied with that.
the balance of the triforce would apparently snap if Link was a girl, can't have two girls in the triforce.
The Mario series is a Donkey Kong spin-off, so that's not exactly an indication they'll be low effort crap or anything.
Ive been amazedfor years now how Nintendo has seemingly gotten a free pass from the diversity argument. Thy are like the grandpa you just let be with their "Tradition"
wait for it
wait for it
but Metroid!
Proposal: Mario Kart and Metroid Prime.Sure it will probably be a good game, but it just doesn't carry the same weight. And one wildly successful spin-off that's over 30 years old doesn't really inspire confidence for the future.
Wario ware and Luigi's Mansion are great series but they're not exactly the same thing nor lighting up the charts.
Link is ambidextrous, so is MiyamotoIsn't that why Link is often portrayed as lefty?
My problem with this is that you've assumed that's how the reincarnation of Zelda works when the evidence in the games says otherwise. Art style differences aside Link looks roughly the same everytime he reincarnates so the general idea of reincarnation doesn't work here. There has to be something special about it. Not to mention Link imo, is very clearly a character and not an avatar. Like you said with James Bond. That is who he is and you wouldn't change it. Link is still Link and always has been.There are some series where people call for a female version of a character and I think it's just ridiculous. I mean, people were calling for a female James Bond. WTF? JAMES BOND IS JAMES BOND. Just because a character has been played by different actors doesn't mean they aren't all playing the same person and that the character's gender is fluid.
On the other hand, Zelda is one series where a female version of the protagonist makes sense, because with a few exceptions (Zelda II, LA, etc.), the protagonists of the games are all different people who are reincarnations of the Hero of Time. Different heroes in the same role could and should be both men and women. The only thing standing in the way is the Link-Zelda dynamic, but hey, it's not like they often give the two any kind of explicit romance, anyway. And even if they did with two females, that's cool, too. It's only old Japanese men and MRA douches who have a problem with an adventure game with two women as the main characters.
Has naughty dog patched in the option to play as nathania drake yet?
Or is it still the developers' choice how they present their protagonist?
Do people really want a female lead crammed into the traditional Zelda series? There's nothing to gain. A unique Sheik game set in the same universe sounds exciting and fun to me. Juggling the secret of being a ninja like warrior and a government figurehead is awesome. A shit ton more awesome than "I'm the chosen hero to do whatever and this time I'm a girl even though that changes nothing because the Zelda series has never explored gender in any real way so I'll do the exact same crap Link did the end"
I guess that's true. I'm just of the opinion that spin-offs can be more exciting and prove to be as successful as the mainline games depending on quality. Tons of other franchises bred great new games from spin-offs, so that's why I'm alright with it.
Why do you keep implying it would be a puzzle game?
Not even talking about an action game (like Miyamoto hinted and what Hyrule Warriors was), but there has been Final Fantasy spinoffs that still were RPGs for example.
Sheik is ninja Zelda. She can also be normal Zelda as well, probably gives you more gameplay optionsI sometimes feel like I'm the only one who would rather play as regular Zelda as opposed to Sheik..
All they ever needed to say. At this point, Link is the character and he is male, and honestly, I prefer it that way. A Sheik spin-off would be great though.
Why do you keep implying it would be a puzzle game?
Not even talking about an action game (like Miyamoto hinted and what Hyrule Warriors was), but there has been Final Fantasy spinoffs that still were RPGs for example.
Given that Aonuma always gives wacky answers while Miyamoto has given two very straightforward answers in a row, I'm pretty sure Miyamoto ruled that Link should stay as a guy and be the main protagonist of Zelda games, and Aonuma was just trying to present a reasoning beyond "Well Miyamoto said no."
He's also heavily implying here that he's the one that went and asked the Zelda team to think about a Sheik game, presumably because he wants to give something to all the people demanding a female lead in Zelda, even though he doesn't want to change Link's role in the series.
For the mainline games, the only possibility I would even see on the table is if they implement multiplayer like Aonuma was implying and didn't have you play as 3 to 4 copies of Link, but I'm assuming you'd only have that choice when playing with more than one player to assert that Link is the primary character.
I sometimes feel like I'm the only one who would rather play as regular Zelda as opposed to Sheik..
I don't know where this outcry for an iconic characters gender to be changed came from, but there's clearly a vocal demand. I would think a game focused on Zelda and Sheik is much better and I think would be better than making Link a female. Why can't the princess be a badass hero that we get to control?
Sure, a female Link would be interesting, but if they'd rather keep his "reincarnation" male and start another female series, that's great too. No reason to be upset.
Edit: A gender choice doesn't strike me as a great idea for Zelda for some reason. I'd rather have a set gender per character.
Sure it will probably be a good game, but it just doesn't carry the same weight. And one wildly successful spin-off that's over 30 years old doesn't really inspire confidence for the future.
Wario ware and Luigi's Mansion are great series but they're not exactly the same thing nor lighting up the charts.
It's amazing how you guys have cherry picked Zelda for years because it's the ONLY Nintendo game where you could conceivably play as a female character and can't. I don't see you mention the fact that the recent Mario games allow you play as female characters now (or that some od the older ones did), or how Splatoon's marketing was focused in the Squid girl, or Xenoblade Chronicles X having Emma essentially be the main character, or FE now having a character creation, etc. It goes on, but keep clinging to Zelda as if it represents all Nintnedo games
I'm pretty sure Miyamoto secretly hates women.
Gender swapped with no gain/impact. Let's cram a female into this role unaffected by gender in the first place to get the same result.I'm just not a fan of spin offs, they are almost never good imo.
What exactly do you mean by crammed into?
You know...i'd honestly like to see a Crisis on Infinite Hyrules where we get to play as many different kinds of Links.
Young Links, Old Links, Female, different species, personalities, etc. Could be really interesting with the series based around time and how it doesn't usually flow in one direction.
I get that he's an "avatar" but I think it's fair to say at this point that the audience sees Link as the character and not just an avatar. Besides, how much of the female player base is asking for/demanding a female Link?No, Link is an avatar to the player and AT LEAST 20% of the player base is made of women, so it is only fair that AT LEAST 20% of the playable Links are girl Links
We know that ... which is why we are asking for a FEMALE REINCARNATION OF LINK, THE OWNER OF THE TRIFORCE not Zelda as the protagonist
What's it matter?
Link is the main protagonist of an ACTION focused game because he has the triforce of COURAGE
Zelda has the triforce of WISDOM, therefore puzzle focused spinoff
We know that ... which is why we are asking for a FEMALE REINCARNATION OF LINK, THE OWNER OF THE TRIFORCE not Zelda as the protagonist
I don't know where this outcry for an iconic characters gender to be changed came from, but there's clearly a vocal demand. I would think a game focused on Zelda and Sheik is much better and I think would be better than making Link a female. Why can't the princess be a badass hero that we get to control?
Gender swapped with no gain/impact. Let's cram a female into this role unaffected by gender in the first place to get the same result.
If gender has no bearing on what's happening in a story, who cares what it is? I'd prefer new stories with interesting characters. Sheik is a fascinating character. I'd much prefer to see her in a new game than Link being made female and in the same type of story again. Maybe it's because I'm a older player but I'd like to see the Zelda mythos expanded beyond "the chosen one" type stories. Gender swapping Link won't do that. Giving the spotlight to Sheik will.
Gender swapped with no gain/impact. Let's cram a female into this role unaffected by gender in the first place to get the same result.
If gender has no bearing on what's happening in a story, who cares what it is? I'd prefer new stories with interesting characters. Sheik is a fascinating character. I'd much prefer to see her in a new game than Link being made female and in the same type of story again. Maybe it's because I'm a older player but I'd like to see the Zelda mythos expanded beyond "the chosen one" type stories. Gender swapping Link won't do that. Giving the spotlight to Sheik will.
I don't know where this outcry for an iconic characters gender to be changed came from, but there's clearly a vocal demand. I would think a game focused on Zelda and Sheik is much better and I think would be better than making Link a female. Why can't the princess be a badass hero that we get to control?
Sheik is ninja Zelda. She can also be normal Zelda as well, probably gives you more gameplay options
I think it would be disappointing if she actually looked like a guy, but modern Sheik is pretty clearly Zelda in a rather effeminate costume and often transforms back into her normal appearance.
It's just completely dishonest and even worse for this character to imply that she can only be in puzzle games, even more when it's coming from people that wanted her to be a protagonist.
Super Princess Peach didn't become a franchise because it wasn't a good game and didn't sell well.
Hyrule Warriors, a game with a mostly female roster, already got another entry on 3DS and will probably get a second game down the line.
If people buy games they are clamouring for, of course developers and publishers look at the demand.
No, Link is an avatar to the player and AT LEAST 20% of the player base is made of women, so it is only fair that AT LEAST 20% of the playable Links are girl Links
Link is the main protagonist of an ACTION focused game because he has the triforce of COURAGE
Zelda has the triforce of WISDOM, therefore puzzle focused spinoff
While Link isn't your most defined character ever, he isn't your generic hero either.
I never bought that Link would be an avatar of the player because he has his own traits. It's not like Mass Effect where I can create any kind of character I want.
For someone with the triforce of wisdom, those arrows she shoots should hurt pretty badly.
The spinoff could be a regular Zelda game with exploring, puzzles and combat. I don't think they would make a puzzle focused game.
I don't see any strong reason why Link -needs- to be the star of mainline games.
Miyamoto: Link will always be malehe is androgynous tho, so you can pretend Link is a woman
I think something like that would have been his honest answer.
Link is about the only one where it'd make sense, to be fair.
Still, I think I'd rather have a Zelda spin off as well.
What is your gender identity?
Mine is female, and when we play as Link we rescue Zelda and the kingdom, playing as a female avatar (Link) I still would want to rescue Zelda. Making Zelda the MC defeats the goal point of the game, and that is saving Zelda (and the kingdom) too me.
SPP was a good game though, for a spinoff.
And what about the implications of saying Zelda can't be the hero of a mainline Zelda game? Which is worse and/or has more significance: my (sardonic) implication, or the implication made by the creator of the series?