Here's what he means: stuff that I think should've been in the game in the first place.Source?
And if he means characters then lol
Here's what he means: stuff that I think should've been in the game in the first place.Source?
By all accounts, Naruto is not hurting for content in the base game by any stretch, nor is it missing any standard features.
Is this not normal? There were alot of SFIV (and various SF HD's) games last gen, ditto for Naruto. Did SF outsell those each time?
Good luck communicating that to people right now though. Just about every major media outlet is laser focused on the Division right now, as well as a good chunk of YouTube.
Now bring back the Clash of Ninja series please.
If this post http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=198118441&postcount=936 doesn't confirm him bragging about the subject at hand and this thread being the product of that I don't know what is.
This thread is basically him reiterating to the world that he called it.
If this post http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=198118441&postcount=936 doesn't confirm him bragging about the subject at hand and this thread being the product of that I don't know what is.
This thread is basically him reiterating to the world that he called it.
It's a little different as Sony already put their cash in.That will be on Sony, they'll need to be on point with the marketing for future content; a decent bundle, promotion, etc.
If Drive Club was able to claw its way to 2+ million sold last year (before the PS+ Edition), then SFV will probably succeed too.
I'd like to see what happens post EVO. V isn't selling great now but EVO will make sure they spotlight the fuck out of it.
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the game still sell bad even with the rise of popularity with Marvel movies?
That will be on Sony, they'll need to be on point with the marketing for future content; a decent bundle, promotion, etc.
If Drive Club was able to claw its way to 2+ million sold last year (before the PS+ Edition), then SFV will probably succeed too.
If this post http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=198118441&postcount=936 doesn't confirm him bragging about the subject at hand and this thread being the product of that I don't know what is.
This thread is basically him reiterating to the world that he called it.
I've seen this statement before. Do we have actual sales data on post EVO to show that it spikes significantly compared to the front loaded nature that videogame releases have proven year after year?
I get that EVO is big in the FGC, but is it big enough beyond that to have impact? Spotlighting V at EVO seems a lot like advertising the hell out of a Pokemon game at a Pokemon tournament, or in other words preaching to the choir.
It's a little different as Sony already put their cash in.
But SFV isn't a Sony game. It's all on Capcom's court now.Yep you are right. DC launched in a way rougher state than SFV ever did. Despite the rough start, and probably way worse press than SFV got, it eventually made it to where it is now.
I've seen this statement before. Do we have actual sales data on post EVO to show that it spikes significantly compared to the front loaded nature that videogame releases have proven year after year?
I get that EVO is big in the FGC, but is it big enough beyond that to have impact? Spotlighting V at EVO seems a lot like advertising the hell out of a Pokemon game at a Pokemon tournament, or in other words preaching to the choir.
『Inaba Resident』;198120195 said:Oh, I was referring to Storm 4s DLC, some of which is really scummy.
But SFV isn't a Sony game. It's all on Capcoms court now.
It will have legs with the FGC, but will other audiences also bite, or did they fail to reel them in?Regardless, SFV will have legs, via its "games-as-a-service" nature.
It will be only version of the game to release this gen, per Capcom, so it won't have future iterations cannibalizing its own sales.
They're good at locking in the hardcore crowd, so they'll be aiming for casuals this year and beyond.
Sure it does. Capcom isn't first party. They don't have that added luxury like Evolution. The rest of the game production is on Capcom and Sony cannot force Capcom's hand like they could with their 1st party studios.That distinction doesn't mean anything.
Their partnership for this game doesn't come to an end upon the release of SFV.
It will have legs with the FGC, but will other audiences also bite, or did they fail to reel them in?
『Inaba Resident』;198120195 said:Oh, I was referring to Storm 4s DLC, some of which is really scummy.
If only they would do an English dub of Op:BB
Would love to hear what Sabo and Bart sound like already.
Doesn't change the fact that the original poster claimed capcom was charging for something while ignoring storm does the same.The point is that there's really nothing in Naruto that points to it being either lacking in features or in content. DLC pricing and availability doesn't change the fact that you get a lot of bang for your buck at $60 without paying a cent extra.
Capcom is charging the same price for SF5, which doesn't even come close to comparing in either features or content. The promise of free updates isn't going to change the fact that it's missing some absolute bare essentials.
SFV was never going to sell at the levels of SFIV. Looking at Ultra Street Fighter 4 sales would be more indicative of the type of sales it was going to do.
Capcom didn't think so.
To be honest, I feel we should be more concerned over Capcom because without Monster Hunter, they'd probably be dead right now. This deal was the only way SFV could even get made.
The point is that there's really nothing in Naruto that points to it being either lacking in features or in content. DLC pricing and availability doesn't change the fact that you get a lot of bang for your buck at $60 without paying a cent extra.
Capcom is charging the same price for SF5, which doesn't even come close to comparing in either features or content. The promise of free updates isn't going to change the fact that it's missing some absolute bare essentials.
The rest of the game production is on Capcom and Sony cannot force Capcom's hand like they could with their 1st party studios.
Right, and they were foolish to think that.
Diff:80.6k
The problem is, the longer those substantial updates take, the weaker its retail presence becomes. They've already said they're not bringing another retail package after this one. So this was it. The chance to make the big impression.SFV is only 65% a game, once the updates come, hopefully sales should pick up.
To mention nothing of other fighters /SIGH
SF4 sold 849k on the PS3+360 back in Feb 2009, so it fell by a lot. Naruto has never done that well at launch.
Guess this is a rare case of extremes! SFV being a skeleton of a game and Naruto 4 apparently being a series finale. I hope SFV doesn't turn out ta be the Street Fighter series finale... x.xThey haven't been compared like this before, but I remember that Naruto Storm 4 shipping over a million worldwide was noteworthy enough for a thread, so the expectation is that SF would sell more than it.
Apparently the Naruto series is at over 12 million worldwide, but thats between PS2/PSP/PS3/PC. Dunno how much of that can be attributed purely to the last non-PS2 games (since PSP counts as last-gen). I'd guess none of 'em individually hit 3 million though so safe bet vanilla SFIV at least comes out on top amongst each series.Is it? I don't know how well Naruto games did on PS3 specifically. I'd bet on the original release of SFIV being a decent seller since it did over 3m worldwide, but it'd be interesting if one of these outlets could find out more.