Quote
Member
It's black and white for both sides. He did/didn't get paid, they did/didn't pay him. If this was just about anything besides unpaid wages then there would certainly be gray area.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Marty ODonnell being paid $95,019.13 by Bungie in settlement, Halo has grossed $3.4B
- Thread starter Nirolak
- Start date
Auto-Reply
Member
Not bad, still wonder what caused the split though.
"Unpaid labor, vacation time, damages and legal" is not simply "unpaid labor."
Last generation was a golden era, in that there were so many franchises that exploded and sold huge amounts. Going forward, I'm not so sure it's going to happen again. Destiny has a shot, and I think Fallout will explode but that's it IMO.
LapinAgile
Member
Why are they idiots? Can you specify the circumstances as to why he was let go an d Bungie is wrong here? People get too emotional over business... thats all it is. Marty is not your friend nor is Bungie. They sell you products.
The Lamonster
Member
I am interested in why he was booted in the first place.
However, I am way more interested to see what he does next. Hopefully he stays in the video game industry. Would love to see him continue to work on sci-fi, maybe with Bioware or 343, but he'd be more than competent scoring a fantasy game as well.
However, I am way more interested to see what he does next. Hopefully he stays in the video game industry. Would love to see him continue to work on sci-fi, maybe with Bioware or 343, but he'd be more than competent scoring a fantasy game as well.
anexanhume
Member
Obviously they judged it better money wise and potentially reputation wise to not have a trial that could expose inner details of what happened.
Prophet Steve
Member
Actually you may be right, I was not aware he also directed the voiceovers. Can't find a confirmation now since I am on my phone.
Quote
Member
Its damages for unpaid labor/vacation. So, yes, I do think its simply "unpaid labor." Do you think the damages amount is coincidently the same amount as the unpaid labor/vacation?
Its weird that there is a field for damages when I just want simple unpaid labor!
DC1
Member
Have you heard the Destiny beta sound track?
the title is misleading being worded this way then. at the very least there should be a period and not a comma between the sentences. better yet, new thread for new news right? makes no sense to have both items in the title of this thread, especially the way it is composed.
i dont really see what one has to do with the other anyways. im sure Marty was paid for his work, and now he got what he was owed after the firing. how much Halo grossed has nothing to do with what he got paid, especially in a settlement after being fired.
AstroNut325
Member
I will miss you Marty! Your scores was one of the top reasons I loved the Halo series so much!
I don't think Bungie realizes what they have lost!
I don't think Bungie realizes what they have lost!
GitarooMan
Member
That's true of both sides here most likely
Why do people keep saying this. If anybody's in a position to know what they "lost", it's them.
I'm not sure where you're going with this... double damages means double damages. They doubled what they believed was owed to him. i.e. the second $38,385 was not simply "unpaid labor" it was damages in addition to unpaid labor. And the remaining $18,249.13 in attorneys fees and "interest" which also isn't unpaid labor.
Again, to my original point; even if Bungie believed they fired with cause, never agreed to pay anything to Marty as he states in the suit, and had provisions to withhold certain benefits/etc.. he's suing for considering he was terminated and didn't resign, it's still much cheaper to settle this way than to spend thousands more to defend themselves even if they eventually won.
molnizzle
Member
If that is in fact the case... then good call, Bungie.
The Elite
BOSS
Saw him talking about playing the Beta on Twitter.
SEGAvangelist
Member
Hey look. Hindle is back. I missed that smiling avatar!
Quote
Member
Its just as likely that one of the groups can't win so they're settling now, which I personally think is more likely the case. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
Triggerhappytel
Member
Most likely means $3.4 billion at retail.
Visualante2
Member
I wonder if it will be as insufferable as the "why won't X developer hire Grant Kirkhope to work on Y game"
Portugeezer
Member
Now I really want confirmation about this, should be interesting.
DarkoMaledictus
Tier Whore
Cheap fuckers that's why...
Yeah, bullshit that he had to go to court. Come on bungie, thought you were better than that.
Son of Sam
Banned
what if he was fired for saying bad things about Peter Dinklages voice acting in Destiny?
totally out there i know but just a thought
totally out there i know but just a thought
Mysterious
Banned
The Lamonster
Member
Oh shit. This is getting interesting. Bungie looking scummy by the minute.
If his shares were vested and there was not a clause in the employment contract for O'Donnell to forfeit them upon termination, then I don't see how Bungie could reclaim them. At that point they belong to him. Losing unvested shares upon separation is normal. There is probably a lot more to the story, but the reasoning provided in the article - Marty would be a pest at board meetings - is an awfully weak reason for stripping him of his voting shares and status.
Wish we could see the actual document.
Interesting.
The most interesting tidbit in my reading so far is the explicit reference to Destiny being a five-part series.
Edit: no real legal counter argument from Bungie in that order. Just that O'Donnell would be obnoxious at board meetings and they wanted to re-allocate his shares as they saw fit later on. Bungie management does not come out of this looking good.
Wind's Howling
Member
Well, Bungie. You fucked up in this regard. Not only did you loose and had to double the payment but you also have some bad publicity on your hands.
Oh, yes. Thanks, kept clicking the link but nothing happened.
Kept reading that as Arbiter.
Yes, that stuck out to me. The original contract was for four or eight parts, depending on how you count the expansion packs.
MrGreencastle
Member
OccamsLightsaber
Regularly boosts GAF member count to cry about 'right wing gaf' - Voter #3923781
He deserves half of that 3m. Seriously though, is that settlement unfair?
Duxxy3
Member
And lost their composer while just barely getting the first part of a series out the door.
Chill Penguin
Member
It's a shame. The music and sound was such a huge part of what made Halo Halo. He's going to be a big asset for whoever scoops him up.