About what I expected.
Why are people upset at 8s?
It's a little surprising some people are putting down GTA V to prop up Infamous. Infamous could learn a thing or two from Rockstar. GTA V was a master class in open world design, and the standard to which all other open world games will be judged.They improved just about every aspect of gameplay, especially shooting/vehicle handling, the interiors, few though they were, were stunningly realized and detailed, as was the entire state of Los Santos, you could switch between 3 characters super fast on the fly and even switch between them during live missions, you could decide how you wanted to plan your heists down to the people you wanted to bring, and although the online portion took a while to come together, it was still impressive having an entire separate experience aside from the single player.
It's just a damn well realized open world game, and nothing so far I've seen from next gen at all comes close to matching it in terms of that aspect.
Oh shit wow. Yeah those are in fact the powers. No one read the eurogamer review if you don't want to be spoiled.
Yes, that review is a spoiler-fest. :-(
Nope. Halo was a revolutionary game. Call of Duty 4 was a revolutionary. They brought a new feel to their respective young generations, with various gameplay innovations that have defined the genre on their platforms for the entire generation.
Not just mine, but everyone's opinion on Gaf means something.
Tons of people got the game early like me and I've only seen two people say they don't really like the game.
It's a fantastic game and I would argue that the impressions people have of the game here are more important than reviews.
So around 80ish metacritic?
Seems about inline with the second game
Very good score. It's good to see the ps4 get a quality retail exclusive after launch
Am I missing something here? Is 81 a bad score? I don't get how people are knocking this game like it's the worst thing to ever hit the system. I'm so confused, guys.
They improved just about every aspect of gameplay, especially shooting/vehicle handling, the interiors, few though they were, were stunningly realized and detailed, as was the entire state of Los Santos, you could switch between 3 characters super fast on the fly and even switch between them during live missions, you could decide how you wanted to plan your heists down to the people you wanted to bring, and although the online portion took a while to come together, it was still impressive having an entire separate experience aside from the single player.
It's just a damn well realized open world game, and nothing so far I've seen from next gen at all comes close to matching it in terms of that aspect.
Am I missing something here? Is 81 a bad score? I don't get how people are knocking this game like it's the worst thing to ever hit the system. I'm so confused, guys.
I will not be purchasing this due to the questionable reviews.
Damn it, thanks guys. I only read one power before closing the tab and to be honest I don't understand it without context but I avoided so much media and previews for this game only to be semi spoiled the day before release. This shit happens to me so often.
Avoid Eurogamers review if you care about spoilers.
Sessler review is the worst review of 2014
All that yapping in the beginning was pathetic
Sorry but titanfall has nothing to do with a infamous review thread. It console war bullshit. If you want to make comparisons make a new thread about it.
Still, for the most part, Second Son is wholly gratifying stuff. Each of the powers feel fully formed and separate, though unified via a shared control scheme - pressing Circle, for example, is going to make Delsin move quickly, but whether he surges forward in a cloud, sprints as a [REDACTED], or grows [REDACTED] is dependent on the equipped power. Combat can be tricky, especially once more powerful DUP agents show up, and a number of opponents are more frustrating than enjoyable to deal with, but overall it's a huge laugh to roll up to a group of soldiers and choke, stab, or stealth-kill them, especially once you've whittled the opposition down to one lone DUP agent, who'll often throw his hands up in surrender - allowing you to deal with him as you wish.
It should be said that Second Son is a thoroughly gorgeous game to look at. Lighting is incredible, each of the powers are brimming with spectacular special effects, and reflections on passing vehicles are particularly stunning. Despite talk of visual downgrading since its first public reveal, Second Son delivers in the visual department. The same holds true for audio, with an impressive soundtrack that kicks in at just the right moments, and that aforementioned brilliant voice cast.
People think 8s are bad now? Seriously?
I fail to see the logic behind this..
Just so everyone knows these reviews mean nothing.
This game is so god damn awesome and everyone should pick it up tomorrow.
It's the most fun I've had with a video game in a long time.
But inFAMOUS is actually fun.It's a little surprising some people are putting down GTA V to prop up Infamous. Infamous could learn a thing or two from Rockstar. GTA V was a master class in open world design, and the standard to which all other open world games will be judged.
I seriously can't believe how many people are upset by this lol. It's literally just a number. It's even a high number!Because the people who think like this have an IQ of a peanut.
I really don't get it. Every single next gen exclusive has been getting 7-8s so far, yet we have these meltdown in every single thread about "man, reviewers don't know shit!"About what I expected.
Why are people upset at 8s?
Obligatory
![]()
Last time i checked 8/10 (80%) was pretty damn good.
When did this become a bad score?
GTA3 (2001) - GTA5(2013) = 12 yrsPlease.
Compare GTA3 to GTA5 and then inFamous 1 to inFamous: Second Son. GTA5 managed to maintain what people loved about GTA3 but really push everything forward in terms of narrative, gameplay, open world, graphics, etc. It felt fresh and new yet still was a "GTA" game.
A lot of people are using TF to point out a double standard in some reviewers which is relevant to the discussion.
Jim Sterling review actually damn good to me.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/art...121-inFAMOUS-Second-Son-Review-The-Good-Son.2
Damn it, thanks guys. I only read one power before closing the tab and to be honest I don't understand it without context but I avoided so much media and previews for this game only to be semi spoiled the day before release. This shit happens to me so often.
Avoid Eurogamers review if you care about spoilers.
More than credibility sake, it's the fact that if they blow all the 10/10 at the beginning of the gen, it will get stale too soon.
Obligatory
![]()
Was definitely true 5 or so years ago, but I don't think it's the case anymore. I know I don't see a score like 7 or 8 in the same light today as I saw it few years ago.8s are bad because modern reviewers are too afraid to go below a 5. An 8 is basically a 6 or so.
Obligatory
![]()
Yeah has me very excited for the game now.It should be noted that he did not like the original infamous as much as everyone else at the time (6/10). A great review for this game
The game's 81 Metacritic average makes it the best reviewed AAA exclusive (discounting Titanfall which is on PC/360 eventually).
Knack at 54, Ryse at 60, Killzone at 73, Dead Rising at 78, Forza V at 80, and now Infamous on top at 81.
Also puts it roughly in line with the 83 of the second game. Sounds fine to me.