I love this show. Have zero interest in the whodunnit aspect tho.
Funny, the writer says he doesn't have any interest in that either. Lol.
I love this show. Have zero interest in the whodunnit aspect tho.
Funny, the writer says he doesn't have any interest in that either. Lol.
Interview or article on this? Plz.
"You can probably tell I don't give a ... about serial killers, and I certainly don't care to engage in some sort of creative cultural competition for who can invent the most disgusting kind of serial killer," he said. "This is just a vehicle. You could have engaged the same obsessions in a doughnut shop. But the show probably wouldn't have sold."
I do think the unifying theme of season one of the show is the damage that men do - to themselves and particularly to women and children. But, within this, I do think I'm always just as concerned with how people wait out darkness, with courage and hope and love. I think, in the end, the total piece points toward a kind of optimism that's hard-earned and redemptive.
I think my serial killer’s personal pathology is wrapped in very culturally relevant symbols that may not be immediately apparent. Not just hunting, but the idea of woman as trophy to be stuffed and displayed. The idea of prayer, and one of the necessities of the prayer pose being the blindfold: in order to effectively pray you’re going to have to ignore some very basic facts about the world.
So to me it’s not just that Cohle and Hart are hunting for their savage id or their most destructive portion. It’s that the killer has some resonance in the kinds of shows we’re talking about. We only have the one murdered woman at the crime scene in the entire series. It’s not an unrelenting horror show. It’s meant to stand in for the universal victim in this type of drama. Because while I think we’re doing a good job of telling the story that this genre demands, I think we’re also poking certain holes in it and looking at where these instincts begin, both in the type of men that Hart and Cohle represent—and in ourselves as an audience.
THE ONION RING!!!!!!!
The real question though, assuming that the guy slit his wrists because someone threatened him about his info on the Yellow King, is, how was the "lawyer" informed about the guy in jail? Someone from either outside the interrogation room or the two cops that were escorting on him tattled to the Yellow King.
This is awesome. Love reading pieces about how there are hints that point to underlying themes, not really interested in pieces pointing out clues to "solve" the mysteryhttp://www.latimes.com/entertainmen...ective-20140108,0,6934835.story#axzz2tf1EqkMY
http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/true-detective-writer-nic-pizzolatto-tells-tall-tales-20140113
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...-mind-of-true-detective-s-nic-pizzolatto.html
It's clear he has no real interest in the mystery itself in the conventional sense, only so much as there being a sort of mystery that unfolds allows him to tell a story about these two men, who they are, what they did, and the world around them. It's very much a character study piece about two detectives caught in solving a crime that is more than what it seems, rather than a traditional whodunnit with a heavy focus on the killer and the crimes.
That second quote....I already feel bad about whatever's gonna happen to Marty's daughter.http://www.latimes.com/entertainment...#axzz2tf1EqkMY
http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/...tales-20140113
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...izzolatto.html
It's clear he has no real interest in the mystery itself in the conventional sense, only so much as there being a sort of mystery that unfolds allows him to tell a story about these two men, who they are, what they did, and the world around them. It's very much a character study piece about two detectives caught in solving a crime that is more than what it seems, rather than a traditional whodunnit with a heavy focus on the killer and the crimes.
Yeah, I really don't see the father in law angle. I agree with you that it was just a set up scene to show that they don;t particularly like one another.Honestly, I feel like the scene we saw with Marty's father-in-law was more to set up their relationship, so when he lays into Marty on the phone, it's not completely out of left field. I don't remember the scene very well, but I remember thinking it was more to contrast how the outside world views these horrible crimes versus how the cop investigating them sees the world.
My Theory:
The yellow king is Marty's father in law, or someone who is connected to him. I believe it's the father-in-law who has been abusing Marty's daughter, or the reason behind her doing those drawings. He is also a wealthy lawyer and perhaps connected to more important people who help bury the murders. Remember the lawyer who called the the guy in custody, who slit his wrists? Marty's father-in law. A lawyer.
Holy shit, since when could McConaughey act? Just watched ep 1, and only watched for Harrelson... but I got to admit, Mr Failure to Launch is actually putting forth a more than decent performance.
I'm stunned, and hooked! Gonna watch more...
Holy shit, since when could McConaughey act? Just watched ep 1, and only watched for Harrelson... but I got to admit, Mr Failure to Launch is actually putting forth a more than decent performance.
I'm stunned, and hooked! Gonna watch more...
Holy shit, since when could McConaughey act? Just watched ep 1, and only watched for Harrelson... but I got to admit, Mr Failure to Launch is actually putting forth a more than decent performance.
I'm stunned, and hooked! Gonna watch more...
Also, couldn't help but notice TV's greatest detective playing a reverend in ep 1.
Holy shit, since when could McConaughey act? Just watched ep 1, and only watched for Harrelson... but I got to admit, Mr Failure to Launch is actually putting forth a more than decent performance.
I'm stunned, and hooked! Gonna watch more...
Also, couldn't help but notice TV's greatest detective playing a reverend in ep 1.
As regards Marty's daughter I think there's something rather off about this idea that her sexual interest must somehow be a resultant of sexual abuse. Her behaviour is more likely down to Marty not necessarily putting the time and effort into instilling personal values and self worth into his daughter Vs worrying about himself and getting his beer on. The very fact that the tiara stays in the tree all those years and is never dislodged is kind of indicative that Marty probably softballed his daughters over getting it down, just as he did when he had to tackle the sexual sketches.
Holy shit, since when could McConaughey act? Just watched ep 1, and only watched for Harrelson... but I got to admit, Mr Failure to Launch is actually putting forth a more than decent performance.
I'm stunned, and hooked! Gonna watch more...
Also, couldn't help but notice TV's greatest detective playing a reverend in ep 1.
The Lincoln Lawyer, Dallas Buyers Club and I have yet to see Mud probably Magic Mike buts his role was a bit minimal
You're in for a ride.
You haven't seen nothing yet
ЯAW;101269244 said:MM has always been great actor, go watch his early movies, the talent has always been there. His decision to bank with the romcoms costed the label of good actor from him, but now he has been of fire since Lincoln Lawyer.
That's good to know. Honestly, the only hype I've been hearing[I may or may not have been living under a rock] was about how cool the first ep was.
I didn't like him in Lincoln Lawyer[that the one with sam jackson?], didn't like him in Contact, Sahara... but he's good in this for sure.
I feel like, this is the first time I've seen him not trying to be adorable.
The one with Sam Jackson was A Time To Kill, 1996. Lincoln Lawyer is from 2011.
It's more the dolls that concern me. It seemed like either a gang-bang or worse a gang-rape. That seems rather disturbing for such a rather young child and in my eyes better explained by something else then Marty not putting enough time in the relationship with his daughter. Not saying it's necessarily abuse, but it could be she witnessed something.
1993Holy shit, since when could McConaughey act?
Anybody else notice that the jail guards, where Guy Francis commits Suicide, one is named Childress? In first episode we heard about the Fontenot family and the old Sheriff Childress who may have covered it up
Pay attention lol
Anybody else notice that the jail guards, where Guy Francis commits Suicide, one is named Childress? In first episode we heard about the Fontenot family and the old Sheriff Childress who may have covered it up
Pay attention lol
That's because you're looking at it through adult eyes. As someone else mentioned earlier on that scene takes place after Cohle talked about his daughter getting run over to Maggie, and the girls happened to be there at the time. The girls were essentially play acting the scene (something kids often do when told a story). Children are not small adults, they're children. They don't think or rationalise or inhabit the same mind space as adults, so projecting adult thinking onto them is a mistake. Given their ages I'd be surprised if 'rape' is a concept either of them are familiar with, least of all able to process.
So you think the doll scene is play acting the car-accident of Cohle's daughter? I didn't get that, but I tend to miss things sometimes in this show.
It may or may not be, but they did say something about a car accident as Marty opened the door.
I need subtitles with this show![]()
So you think the doll scene is play acting the car-accident of Cohle's daughter? I didn't get that, but I tend to miss things sometimes in this show.
It may or may not be, but they did say something about a car accident as Marty opened the door.
Can someone post a pick of Tuttle? Isn't he the police boss of Marty and Rust.
very interesting reading this thread
Based on the evidence you guys have deduced.. the yellow king involves 4 dudes:
-Tuttle
-Marty's father in law
-Priest guy who was with the castrated mentally handicap guy
-Governor?
guy on mower also involved
Holy shit, since when could McConaughey act?
There's only one reason why someone who has been successfully living off the grid for almost a decade would do something so randomly banal as register his car, and that's because he wanted to be found by someone who he thinks is looking for him and who has access to state databases.So chole, who has been off the grid, suddenly re enters the state, registers his car under his own name and hangs out at one of the murder scenes?
That is too clumsy for rust if he is the killer. Why register the car under your name, why hang out at the murder scene?
My new theory is: rust finds enough evidence to think it was Tuttle. He kills him but makes it look like a suicide. Then he comes back onto the grid and there is a new murder. This is why rust looks so angry in the photo at the crime scene. It dawns on him that Tuttle may have been involved but obviously wasn't the one that killed the women. I now agree that the father in law being the killer makes sense as he was a lawyer and had access to Marty's daughter, so could have abused her.
Also, the scene where Marty is speaking to the father in law, I'm pretty sure that the father in law asks how the case is going. Why would he care specifically about the case?
![]()
Reverend Tuttle, we meet him at the PD in Episode 2 (?), exiting the Captain's office.
Chole chastises the two interrogating detectives for being company men and that they should actually do some police work. Possible hint that Chole never stopped trying to solve the case and was doing exactly that when he was off the grid.
Thing that keeps be going back to Tuttle is that he is a sort of well known actor," well known for just appearing twice" Something is fishy about him.
If anything these modern day detectives will team up with Rust and Marty to solve the case.What if the current day detectives end up doing what Rust and Marty couldn't do which is solve the case.