Captain Blood
Member
AnEternalEnigma said:It's the most unabashed shady DLC shit I've seen this gen.
Fuck it dude just hop on RE5 and play some of its multiplayer modes.........o wait.
AnEternalEnigma said:It's the most unabashed shady DLC shit I've seen this gen.
GhaleonEB said:You can play most gametypes available in matchmaking without downloading for-pay maps. Meanwhile, those who did download them have a set of playlists they can depend onto get some mileage out of their purchase. It's a hard situation made even harder by Microsoft's refusal to let the Legendary maps go free, but that's their call, not Bungie's. But the level of hyperbole in your outrage grossly overstates the situation. No one is blocked from matchmaking if they don't have the premium content. Most of the playlists don't require them.
It really is a shitty situation, but I think you underestimate Microsoft's involvement. Bungie was for a long time a first party developer, MS naturally would have made many of the pricing decisions (And they did). Even now while Bungie is independent, Microsoft still wields a large amount of control over Halo 3 and the franchise itself. Bungie hasn't exactly kept quiet about who decides when or even if stuff becomes free. Shuffling around playlists won't fix it, not now.AnEternalEnigma said:Starting in June, there's only going to be about 3 or 4 playlists that won't require the Legendary or Mythic maps. The most played playlist, Team Slayer, is going to be locked out from non-Legendary/Mythic owners. That decision has nothing to do with Microsoft.
Don't even pretend that's not a fucking dirty thing to do.
I understand that Microsoft controls the DLC pricing on games that they publish. I totally get that. But that Bungie does with these playlists is 100% up to them. Completely pissing on the non-DLC owners like what they plan to do in June is really sad considering this is the same company who, pre-Halo 2, wanted to keep all their DLC free.
I guess greed is contagious.
KevinRo said:Man, I was arguing this point myself like a month ago.
DLC requirement in matchmaking is a fraud for people who bought this game for $60.
Watch out, BDF on the WAYYYYYY!!!!
Nutter said:Just because you tell people to stop being cheap and buy the damn maps does not mean you are part of the BDF. Though ill happily be part of it. I do not have a problem with the playlists. I want to play My *purchased* DLC in Ranked Playlists. I think Bungle should perhaps make social playlists not require the maps, while have the ranked ones required.
Nutter said:Just because you tell people to stop being cheap and buy the damn maps does not mean you are part of the BDF. Though ill happily be part of it. I do not have a problem with the playlists. I want to play My *purchased* DLC in Ranked Playlists. I think Bungle should perhaps make social playlists not require the maps, while have the ranked ones required.
MS doesn't handle what and what doesn't get required for the playlists in today's Halo 3 setup. They do control the pricing, and that hasn't been a secret. I haven't heard people moaning about the prices of maps for a while, and that's because since Halo 2's multiplayer map packs, they've been quite fair. Now then you discuss, does substance equal quality? Are maps like Foundry worth it? Are maps like Standoff or Orbital worth it? That's after your decision to purchase the said map packs.Botolf said:It really is a shitty situation, but I think you underestimate Microsoft's involvement. Bungie was for a long time a first party developer, MS naturally would have made many of the pricing decisions (And they did). Even now while Bungie is independent, Microsoft still wields a large amount of control over Halo 3 and the franchise itself. Bungie hasn't exactly kept quiet about who decides when or even if stuff becomes free. Shuffling around playlists won't fix it, not now.
Having said that, it's still an enormously shitty way of doing business and I hope one day Microsoft's wallet suffers because of it.
I realize that, but like I said, he was underestimating Microsoft's involvement in this. Bungie might have found a solution to avoid this problem before release, after the release date their options became much more limited (Thanks in large part that they can't change many parts of the game). Playlist shuffling might help, but it's not going to be a solution any of the people complaining will be happy with (I wouldn't happy with it either, I believe this bullshit model should have been shot down when it was first suggested!). Any overhauls of the playlists themselves would introduce their own potentially huge negatives (waiting 15 minutes for your game to find people to populate a single match comes to mind). I'm not a fan at all of forcing players to have the DLC to play the old playlists, but it seems like Bungie may be backed into a corner here. Don't do it, and the people will protest with their wallets and wait for abysmal sales to force the prices down. Do it, and you'll bump up the number of players in those playlists with your new maps. Don't do it, and your DLC may get barely any playtime in the playlists, decreasing incentive to get them in the first place.Striker said:MS doesn't handle what and what doesn't get required for the playlists in today's Halo 3 setup. They do control the pricing, and that hasn't been a secret.
yikes.KevinRo said:![]()
:lol :lol :lol :lol
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:lol
:lol
:lol
Before the update you could play your *purchased* DLC in Ranked Playlists. So your argument is invalid. If you wanted to play your purchased DLC more often then blame Bungie for not making the maps free or more enticing to buy aka make better fucking maps then Blackout and Orbital. Oh, and I remember playing Left4Dead the other day with a new mode and a new map that I *cough* DID NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR.
This whole hide behind M$ is a cop-out. If you can't see this now that they(BUNGIE NOT M$) is now requiring people to buy DLC to play in Matchmaking then you are just plain blind.
mood said:Get over it you broke ass chumps. Buy the maps if you want to play the best playlists in a 2 year old game. I'm tired of you welfare babies forcing us to play Isolation for the umpteenth time.
Dani said:A few disgruntled folks popping on a non-Bungie forum, hoping to bitch directly at Bungie employees because they happen to post here is both pathetic and not reflective of the overwhelming majority of online Halo 3 players' opinions and attitudes.
AnEternalEnigma said:So the people that don't want to buy the maps get fucked because Bungie is too stupid to figure out how to integrate it? Call of Duty 4 and Call of Duty: World at War have no problem having the DLC maps show up in regular playlists seamlessly without completely fracturing playlists into the DLC/non-DLC mess that Bungie has.
Shit, even the mess that is Gears of War 2 has figured out how to integrate DLC maps into regular playlists.
But of course, since Bungie can't figure it out, they'll just try and swindle people out of more money.
You don't know that. It's obvious MS can say what kind of integration DLC maps get as they've tied it to Legendary.Striker said:MS doesn't handle what and what doesn't get required for the playlists in today's Halo 3 setup.
Deputy Moonman said:BDF garbage
Deputy Moonman said:People keep forgetting that Matchmaking is only one part of Halo3. You still have the campaign, online coop, customs, and the ability to do some of the matchmaking on Xbox-live, without having to buy any of the new content. The argument that says, "I shouldn't have to fork over more money after paying 60 bucks to keep my product functional," is not exactly correct. It's not like you went out and bought a baseball bat. There's a lot more involved in the upkeep of online games.
Can Blizzard keep the sheer number of people it has playing World of Warcraft without constantly making fixes and updates to the game? If not, do you feel that they're justified in charging a monthly fee? If you answered yes, then you have to take into consideration the amount of work that goes into keeping Halo3 a fun game over the internet, too.
The one thing no one can argue is that businesses are in the business of trying to make money. It's bad salesmanship if you're not trying to milk the dollar. Whether anyone likes it or not, I don't know why anyone should expect differently.
FTWer said:Since this is bumped, did Bungie change it so I can play ranked 16 player games without having to buy DLC or are they still limiting 8-12 players max on every playlist for people who haven't bought the DLC?
Eye of the Tiger training montage incoming?Deputy Moonman said:EDIT: On a side note, I was just playing some games on team mythic and two guys were trying to convince me to let them boost my account to 50. Basically, they claimed they just wanted to play team doubles and that using a lower account made it more fun for them. But there is still the whole, "having to give them your account information" thing too. And I wouldn't get to play while they were doing it. I left their party. Some day I'll hit 50, and when I do it will be because I made it to 50 and not someone else for me.
:lol Haha I'll get on that right awayZeouterlimits said:Eye of the Tiger training montage incoming?
When the bickering and moaning starts is when I leave the thread, just let it get it out of the system.Shake Appeal said:Finding it harder and harder to read this thread. Just constant back-and-forth squabbling. Maybe if I played with some of you, but as it is it's just a flow and ebb (and mostly flow) of bile and bickering. I'm surprised the Bungie staffers come here.
Ignore lists help...somewhat.Shake Appeal said:Finding it harder and harder to read this thread. Just constant back-and-forth squabbling. Maybe if I played with some of you, but as it is it's just a flow and ebb (and mostly flow) of bile and bickering. I'm surprised the Bungie staffers come here.
ohhhh, that's what Shake Appeal meant by 'flow'Grimm Fandango said:HaloGAF is on its period again.
Domino Theory said:Call of Duty 4 doesn't even have a map pack playlist! It showed up once when the maps originally came out then went away. It showed up again for one DBLEXP weekend, and it's gone. The maps only show up when everyone in the room has them, that's not "figuring it out", that's just how ALL MP games with maps as DLC work, even Halo 3.
Microsoft put Bungie in this position. Microsoft controls the pricing of the DLC, not Bungie.AnEternalEnigma said:There's a reason they don't need the playlist. I and my friends see the DLC maps all the time in regular playlists Call of Duty 4. Infinity Ward didn't fucking fracture the user base, keeping non-DLCers out of certain playlists like Bungie is doing/about to do.
So tell me, if Halo 3 can do this, why are they about to lock out non-DLC owners from these playlists?
:lolDax01 said:Microsoft put Bungie in this position. Microsoft controls the pricing of the DLC, not Bungie.
Strider2K99 said:I would so be down for Halo 2.
EazyB said:You know what I hate? Bad things. They suck.
Who's with me?
Never said Bungie didn't have a say.Nutter said::lol
Im sure M$ (am I doing it right?!?) is the main culprit, but to say Bungie had no say. lol.
Microsoft doesn't decide what playlists make DLC as a requirement. What are you trying to suggest?Dax01 said:Never said Bungie didn't have a say.
Kibbles said:^ Speaking of BuTube...
Render to Video Public Beta... sadface and point requirements. I'll stick to my capture card for now unless I want some HD stuff.
http://www.bungie.net/News/content.aspx?type=topnews&link=RTVPublicBeta