Support NeoGAF

[Jason's Ultimatum]

90% of the regions oil flows through the straight, while 50% of the worlds oil does so.

It would cause the world economy to go into beast mode. And Iran doesn't have the power to enforce a blockade.

Nothing but saber-rattling, folks.

 

[[Nintex]]

Iran is going to test some long-range missiles tommorow. This is going to be fun:

Iran will escalate tensions in the Persian Gulf on Saturday by test-firing a barrage of long-range missiles just days after it threatened to hold the world's economy to ransom by sealing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital energy waterway.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...US.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

 

[el retorno]

Isn't there always a US Navy presence near the Strait of Hormuz? It shouldn't be a shock to Iran. Also, I imagine hiding a supercarrier isn't easy to do.

The news came from the Iranian news agency. I´d imagen its purpose is more domestic.

Binyahim Netanyahu's own intelligence chief caught undermining his "crazy mullah" bullshit.

nuclear-armed Iran wouldn't necessarily constitute a threat to Israel's continued existence, Mossad chief Tamir Pardo reportedly hinted earlier this week.
This is the second Mossad chief to say this. Ehud Barak has said it too.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/mossad-chief-a-nuclear-iran-isn-t-necessarily-a-existential-threat-1.404227
while the "irrational, suicide state" theory and allusions to Hitler was always vulgar propaganda for European and American consumption, it's nice to hear Israeli heavyweights dismiss it time and time again.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/12/28/u-s-israel-discuss-triggers-for-bombing-iran-s-nuclear-infrastructure.html

This isn´t really new. And I think Bibi listens more to these guys than he lets on. He´s playing the politics game using Iran to make himself look strong. Remember he hasn´t really flashed Israeli´s army much. Cast Lead was under Olmert. He has to live up to his right-wing persona. I think their more mad that people are downplaying in Iran as a threat for Iran in public. There´s been the Israeli is going to attack Iran tomorrow for the last, what, 3 years?

 

[el retorno]

Iran´s called for new talks

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAN_NUCLEAR?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

 

[speculawyer]

Another message for Iran

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States has reached a deal to sell $3.48 billion worth of missiles and related technology to the United Arab Emirates, a close Mideast ally, as part of a massive buildup of defense technology among friendly Mideast nations near Iran.
Pentagon spokesman George Little announced the Christmas Day sale on Friday night. He said the U.S. and U.A.E. have a strong defense relationship and are both interested in "a secure and stable" Persian Gulf region.

The deal includes 96 missiles, along with supporting technology and training support that Little says will bolster the nation's missile defense capacity.

The deal includes a contract with Lockheed Martin to produce the highly sophisticated Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, weapon system for the U.A.E.

Tom McGrath, vice president and program manager for Lockheed Martin's THAAD program in Dallas, said in a statement it was the first foreign military sale of the THAAD system.

We need to keep Iran around . . . it provides us with a nice export market for one of the few remaining things we are good at manufacturing.

http://news.yahoo.com/us-seals-3-48b-missiles-technology-sale-uae-034722886.html

 

[theignoramus]

US President Barack Obama has signed into law tough new sanctions against Iran's central bank and financial sector, marking the sharpest economic confrontation between Washington and Tehran yet and potentially stoking tensions in the Gulf.

Saturday's measures, meant to punish the Islamic Republic for its nuclear programme, were contained in a $662 billion defense bill, which officials said Obama signed despite concern it could complicate his bid to build an international front against Tehran.

The sanctions require foreign firms to make a choice between doing business with Tehran's oil and financial sectors or central bank or the mighty US economy and financial sector.

Foreign central banks which deal with the Iranian central bank on oil transactions could also face similar restrictions under the new law, which has sparked fears of damage to US ties with nations like Russia and China.

Obama said in a statement issued as he signed the bill that he was concerned the measure would interfere with his constitutional authority to conduct foreign relations by tying his hands in dealings with foreign governments.

The bill, which passed with wide majorities in Congress, did reserve some wiggle room for Obama, granting him the power to grant 120 day waivers if he judges it to be in the national security interests of the United States.

Senior US officials said Washington was engaging with its foreign partners to ensure the sanctions can work without harming global energy markets, and stressed the US strategy for engaging with Iran was unchanged by the bill.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2011/12/20111231204613268574.html

Nothing remotely positive will come of this and it practically guarantees something uglier will happen down the road.


Still, if oil prices soar in the next year, it will only be a right and proper consequence of this. All of Iran's enriched uranium is under the surveillance of IAEA inspectors and until that changes, penalizing countries that do business with Iran's central bank is a wildly disproportionate bully move. I hope the Knesset clones in Congress enjoy the inevitable backlash.

edit:
if I sound emotional about this, it's because I am. If you want to go down the warpath with another country, one of the best ways of doing that is crippling their economy.

 

[RevDM]

I asked my mom what her family (in Iran) thinks about everything going on right now. She clasped her hands and said "I would not dare ask (her sister) about it." she said the government has silenced the country from discussing the situation. If anyone is caught discussing it, something terrible would happen to them. I don't know how true this is, I think she could be exaggerating a bit. Can anyone confirm or deny this?

 

[Pollux]

So whats the deal with iran blockading the strait of hormuz? They doing it or not?

 

[[Nintex]]

So Obama signed those oil export sanctions into law and Iran tested a Nuclear fuel rod:
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/01/world/meast/iran-nuclear-rod/index.html

Tehran, Iran (CNN) -- Iran succeeded in building and testing the country's first nuclear fuel rod, the semiofficial news agency FARS said Sunday.
The rod, containing natural uranium, was successfully tested and is being "radiated in the core of the Tehran research nuclear reactor," the news agency said, citing Iran's atomic energy agency website.
Natural uranium is used to fuel reactors.

I say we're way past the point of no return now.

 

[Tapiozona]

So whats the deal with iran blockading the strait of hormuz? They doing it or not?

They're not doing it. A few days after the US said they would not tollerate any blockade of the straight, Iran said it was all a misunderstanding, etc.

 

[Dreams-Visions]

We will all lose in this dick-measuring contest between Iran and the West. Surely they understand how serious we are about them not obtaining nuclear weapons. Surely we understand how serious they are about it without coming out and saying they are.

Bombs will fall in the next couple of years.

 

[Archer]

I asked my mom what her family (in Iran) thinks about everything going on right now. She clasped her hands and said "I would not dare ask (her sister) about it." she said the government has silenced the country from discussing the situation. If anyone is caught discussing it, something terrible would happen to them. I don't know how true this is, I think she could be exaggerating a bit. Can anyone confirm or deny this?

my gf is from tehran, and she discusses it with her family via skype, telephone calls via calling card, and facebook all the time.

 

[Jenga]

who cares, we have big dicks

 

[PhoenixDark]

I'm not voting for Obama if we attack Iran this year. This is ridiculous

 

[Tapiozona]

I'm not voting for Obama if we attack Iran this year. This is ridiculous

Your options on the other side are even worse. They'll drop a whole lot more bombs than Obama would. Perry at least has stated multiple times that he would not tollerate Iran and would take action if he were elected.

 

[Gaborn]

So Obama signed those oil export sanctions into law and Iran tested a Nuclear fuel rod:
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/01/world/meast/iran-nuclear-rod/index.html



I say we're way past the point of no return now.

Iran is entitled to a peaceful nuclear program under international law.

 

[PhoenixDark]

Your options on the other side are even worse. They'll drop a whole lot more bombs than Obama would. Perry at least has stated multiple times that he would not tollerate Iran and would take action if he were elected.

I wouldn't vote for any republican. If anything I'd write in someone, or contemplate a Gary Johnson protest vote.

 

[Tapiozona]

Iran is entitled to a peaceful nuclear program under international law.

Just curious. Do you honestly think those are their end goals for their nuclear program? Civilian nuclear power and not nuclear weapons? Seems multiple people say the same thing. Seems silly to me. It's like the people who actually believe Barry Bonds didn't know he was using steriods.

 

[Wazzim]

Iran is entitled to a peaceful nuclear program under international law.

Nobody cares about International Law unless it's in their favor.

Just curious. Do you honestly think those are their end goals for their nuclear program? Civilian nuclear power and not nuclear weapons? Seems multiple people say the same thing. Seems silly to me. It's like the people who actually believe Barry Bonds didn't know he was using steriods.

That's not the point really, because then you could put out sanctions against every country you think is suspicious. That's obviously not the way to go and will ultimately result in more nuclear weapons instead of less.

 

[PhoenixDark]

Just curious. Do you honestly think those are their end goals for their nuclear program? Civilian nuclear power and not nuclear weapons? Seems multiple people say the same thing. Seems silly to me. It's like the people who actually believe Barry Bonds didn't know he was using steriods.

I think it's clear they want nuclear weapons, and they certainly have ties to terrorism - we also know they arm insurgents in Iraq. But attacking Israel would ensure their total destruction, and given how isolated they are from the rest of the ME I can't see other countries having a problem with that.

A nuclear Iran ensures the US doesn't attack them, why wouldn't they want a weapon?

 

[Dreams-Visions]

I wouldn't vote for any republican. If anything I'd write in someone, or contemplate a Gary Johnson protest vote.

Unfortunately, such a move could indirectly aid in a much worse situation. don't let your frustration cloud your judgment and critical thinking. Things are not great, but things could be MUCH worse.

A nuclear Iran ensures the US doesn't attack them, why wouldn't they want a weapon?

not a safe assumption. at all.

 

[Tapiozona]

Because they have extremists in power who talk about using them. I understand they have a right to them just like the US and so many other countries did when they developed their own. Even if Iran does get them I can't imagine a single scenario where they'd use them, but all the death to Israel, death to Saudi Arabia, death to America, death to non-muslim rhetoric is a bit scarey when they have nuclear weapons in their hands.

 

[Gaborn]

Just curious. Do you honestly think those are their end goals for their nuclear program? Civilian nuclear power and not nuclear weapons?

I honestly think until they start violating international law it would be incredibly dangerous to bomb a country merely for doing what they were entitled to do. Is it possible they want a nuclear weapon? Sure, it's possible but they've done nothing wrong with their nuclear program so far.

Seems multiple people say the same thing. Seems silly to me. It's like the people who actually believe Barry Bonds didn't know he was using steriods.

What alternative is there? What would YOU do if you were President confronted by a country that DARES to test a nuclear fuel rod for a nuclear power plant?

 

[Ether_Snake]

It's pretty much 100% certain that whatever happens, eventually someone will intervene to prevent Iran from making nukes.

 

[Gaborn]

It's pretty much 100% certain that whatever happens, eventually someone will intervene to prevent Iran from making nukes.

I wonder if Obama would ask for congressional authorization this time.

 

[Dreams-Visions]

Because they have extremists in power who talk about using them. I understand they have a right to them just like the US and so many other countries did when they developed their own. Even if Iran does get them I can't imagine a single scenario where they'd use them, but all the death to Israel, death to Saudi Arabia, death to America, death to non-muslim rhetoric is a bit scarey when they have nuclear weapons in their hands.

To be fair, Iran hasn't been the aggressor in a conflict in...a looong, loooooooooong time.

Fears that they will suddenly be emboldened to invade its neighbors seems comically misplaced.

 

[Ether_Snake]

I wonder if Obama would ask for congressional authorization this time.

He would get it.

 

[Al-ibn Kermit]

Because they have extremists in power who talk about using them. I understand they have a right to them just like the US and so many other countries did when they developed their own. Even if Iran does get them I can't imagine a single scenario where they'd use them, but all the death to Israel, death to Saudi Arabia, death to America, death to non-muslim rhetoric is a bit scarey when they have nuclear weapons in their hands.

No, I don't anybody in the government has ever come out and said to use a nuclear weapon. The production, stockpiling, or use of nuclear weapons is specifically forbidden by their religious authorities due to it's only real use being attacking civilian centers. There is no way they could swing a nuclear weapons program by their own populace after several years of ruling those weapons as anti-Islamic. But then there is no way they could use nuclear weapons as a deterrent unless they publicized the existence of such a program.

I personally think they should have full freedom to pursue nuclear technology within the constraints of IAEA regulations, which they have kept within. I just hope something comes from Iran's gesture yesterday for another round of talks.

 

[Gaborn]

He would get it.

I'm not questioning that, I'm asking if he'll bother to ASK this time.

 

[Ether_Snake]

No, I don't anybody in the government has ever come out and said to use a nuclear weapon. The production, stockpiling, or use of nuclear weapons is specifically forbidden by their religious authorities due to it's only real use being attacking civilian centers. There is no way they could swing a nuclear weapons program by their own populace after several years of ruling those weapons as anti-Islamic. But then there is no way they could use nuclear weapons as a deterrent unless they publicized the existence of such a program.

I personally think they should have full freedom to pursue nuclear technology within the constraints of IAEA regulations, which they have kept within. I just hope something comes from Iran's gesture yesterday for another round of talks.

Please, don't use religion to support rationality.

 

[Carlbeego]

When does this movie come out?

 

[el retorno]

To be fair, Iran hasn't been the aggressor in a conflict in...a looong, loooooooooong time.

Fears that they will suddenly be emboldened to invade its neighbors seems comically misplaced.

Taking hostages in an embassy doesn´t count? Funding terrorists?

They haven´t started wars because they never were able.

 

[Al-ibn Kermit]

Please, don't use religion to support rationality.

.....I was being pretty clear and concise I thought. The government's entire authority in the country is based on their religious authority, therefore invalidating the religious laws is not something they can really do, at least not so overtly.

 

[Ether_Snake]

.....I was being pretty clear and concise I thought. The government's entire authority in the country is based on their religious authority, therefore invalidating the religious laws is not something they can really do, at least not so overtly.

Suicide is also forbidden in Islam..............

 

[Al-ibn Kermit]

Suicide is also forbidden in Islam..............

And most Muslims believe that, look at the extraordinarily low suicide rates in Muslim countries. Even talk about suicide is taboo, you see it implied rather than shown in Iranian cinema for example.

 

[nib95]

Taking hostages in an embassy doesn´t count? Funding terrorists?

They haven´t started wars because they never were able.

Isignificant in comparison to the US's aggressive and heinous actions in the region as of late. Unless you're horribly jaded and have taken in to US propaganda wholly, it's pretty obvious who the aggressor is here. Only in the US can you spin a captured spy drone as an act of aggression by the country who's air space was invaded. US has been run by a bunch of murderers and crooks for the longest time now, and I don't mean of a small calibre, but of grotesque proportions, that make even 9/11 seem timid in terms of the number of civilian deaths.

It's all getting out of hand now.

 

[Pollux]

Suicide is also forbidden in Islam..............

Tell that to the people who are blowing themselves up.

 

[Dreams-Visions]

Taking hostages in an embassy doesn´t count? Funding terrorists?

You're comparing taking hostages and funding some small terrorist groups to BEING THE AGGRESSOR IN FULL-SCALE WAR? Is this real life?

They haven´t started wars because they never were able.

lol

 

[eudaemonic]

And most Muslims believe that, look at the extraordinarily low suicide rates in Muslim countries. Even talk about suicide is taboo, you see it implied rather than shown in Iranian cinema for example.

Wait... is there a loop hole that if you have a bomb around your chest it's okay then?

Might need to add that to my list under "hole in the sheet".

 

[Tawpgun]

I say go ahead with the nuclear launching. I could use an atomic winter. Winter in New England is lacking this year.

 

[Alpha-Bromega]

Taking hostages in an embassy doesn´t count? Funding terrorists?

They haven´t started wars because they never were able.

Yeah man, we sort of overthrew their President before that.

and then had Iraq invade them.

etc. etc.

but hey, the Iranians took hostages!

 

[Osietra]

I say go ahead with the nuclear launching. I could use an atomic winter. Winter in New England is lacking this year.

You obviously listen to Infowars, and those big jars of vitamins won't really be much use when the Internet dies. As the government will use the forthcoming war with Iran to restrict internet access to the populace, unless it's 'something really important'.

 

[Gaborn]

You obviously listen to Infowars, and those big jars of vitamins won't really be much use when the Internet dies. As the government will use the forthcoming war with Iran to restrict internet access to the populace, unless it's 'something really important'.

Such as Sasha and Malia doing their homework.

 

[Meadows]

I say go ahead with the nuclear launching. I could use an atomic winter. Winter in New England is lacking this year.

 

[Buba Big Guns]

Because they have extremists in power who talk about using them. I understand they have a right to them just like the US and so many other countries did when they developed their own. Even if Iran does get them I can't imagine a single scenario where they'd use them, but all the death to Israel, death to Saudi Arabia, death to America, death to non-muslim rhetoric is a bit scarey when they have nuclear weapons in their hands.

Fear mongering at its finest.

 

[ThoseDeafMutes]

The production, stockpiling, or use of nuclear weapons is specifically forbidden by their religious authorities due to it's only real use being attacking civilian centers.

Huh?

 

[DOBERMAN INC]

Iran 'test-fires medium-range missile' in Gulf

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16377185

 

[Pctx]

good OP as i read through all of it. I'll point out a couple of my beliefs on this issue:

1) 2012 will be the year of no bullshit politics. People in all parts of the world in all forms of government are going to be forced to act. The EU is going to have to figure out if they have balls or not to do the right thing about their currency with this issue with Iran brewing. On the flip side, our so far moronic president will actually have to own the sanctions bill due to go into effect in July.

2) We, the US should not even begin to think about military action in Iran. We do not have the money, we do not have the time and we do not have the right to attack Iran. Right now i feel like we are Rome. How many years have we know peace? It is not our responsibility to be the world police; however it is the responsibility of the world for all of us to look out for each other. In other words, the world is not ready for world war 3 over the price of oil and Iran continuing to posture.

3) Depending on if the sanctions go into effect and if gas prices go up, then Obama won't see a 2nd term which I'm sure he fears. Truth is though, its scary to think what war mongerer we'll have in office this next year. If we do this, we must start the energy race, like the space race, to find a true alternative, renewable and cheap replacement for oil.

tl;dr
No shouldn't go to war
Yes protect people
Lets find a new product to end dependence on oil.

 

[Al-ibn Kermit]

Huh?

You can't directly target civilians.

 

[Enco]

Wait... is there a loop hole that if you have a bomb around your chest it's okay then?

Might need to add that to my list under "hole in the sheet".

No loop hole because terrorism isn't part of the religion. Just crazy people.