• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

RTX 50 Super Series back in development

We are so back boys. I'd love to have a 5080Super over my 5080. 50% more ram will be dope for local AI.

Source on Lisa Su saying they're cutting RDNA4 shipments?

No one cares about AMD GPUs except console gamers and that's because they can't have anything better on PS5 not Xbox.

How is it too late, it's not like RDNA5 or Intel Celestial is coming anytime soon (hell rumors are celestial isnt coming at all). It's not like anything else better is coming anytime soon and what we have now is worse.

No 5060TI 16GB is clamshelled up. Just remove the 2GB chips and replace them with 3GB chips without setting them up in clamshell configuration. Same chip, same memory bus but now with 12GB of memory.

Jensen is providing the best gaming experience as he always has, Sony and Microsoft stuff is massively inferior because they're stuck using cheap AMD GPUs and AMD gets obliterated by Nvidia. Yes chips are more expensive but that goes for all consumer HW using dram and Nand including the PS5 Xbox and Switch 2. You want a cheap card buy a 5050, 3060 or 3050.

There's this thing called "multi-quote".
 
Source on Lisa Su saying they're cutting RDNA4 shipments?

20% Less gaming revenue + Higher ASPs = Significantly lower shipment counts.

And this is compared with AMD that had 5-7% share LMAO.

Don't worry though, no one wants RDNA4 so it will remain abundantly available as the existing inventory isn't selling.
 
I've kind of lost interest now that consoles are going back to the whole exclusives thing. I'm waiting for the ps6, but if I can't hold out, I might grab a ps5.
 
with 6000 series next year, i'll happily wait it out on my 5080. zen 6 with 6080 next year will be all i need to play GTA6 in its full glory :)
I suspect Super release means 2028 for 6000 series, which is also ok. I have a 5080 as well and it's not going to be worth it trying to sell the thing and upgrade for just more VRAM.
 
in modern games, RTX20 beat the GTX10 easily

Here we see 2080Ti 48% faster than 1080Ti.
By estimation, it would make 2080S at least ~30% faster than 1080Ti


I think in new games even 2070 beats 1080ti.

Turing was first nvidia modern architecture designed to use DX12 in a good way (Maxwell and Pascal sucked with async for example), even 16xx Turing cards (that don't have RT and DLSS support) outperform Pascal cards (too bad they are vram limited).
 
No 5060TI 16GB is clamshelled up. Just remove the 2GB chips and replace them with 3GB chips without setting them up in clamshell configuration. Same chip, same memory bus but now with 12GB of memory.
That would be taking the 8GB 5060ti and just changing the four 3GB memory chips and leaving the back unpopulated.

As I replied to someone else. I'm taking about the "move to 9GB" on the 5050/5060. That would require going to just three 3GB chips. Which is only a 96-bit memory interface versus four memory chips on a 128-bit interface.


in modern games, RTX20 beat the GTX10 easily

Here we see 2080Ti 48% faster than 1080Ti.
By estimation, it would make 2080S at least ~30% faster than 1080Ti

I guess if you consider sub 30 fps on the 2080ti at 1080p being playable.

NVIDIA backported raytracing to GTX 10. So games with it can run, but they are terrible compared to GPUs with dedicated hardware to handle it. The fact that the 1080ti is neck and neck with the 2070 for things it was never designed to run is even more impressive.

IMO, the point still stands. RTX 20 didn't offer anything to compel people to upgrade from the GTX 10 card. The 3080ti is a 50% increase in performance over the 2080ti on that game you linked. Yet still below the 60fps most PC games want at 1080p. If you are going for what games can you get going on ancient hardware, there are many surprises. But you are comparing 8 year old hardware to 10 year old.

Of course we also need to look at how the game performs on modern hardware, and well it's not looking good. The 5070ti is 60fps... at 1080p. Go to 1440p and you are sub 50fps. Looks like an unoptimized turd to me.
 
looks like AI bubble is bursting now!

broadcomm earnings forecast is very downbeat on AI growth. The selloff begins...

Seems like Jensen saw it coming hence the supers are back on the menu.
COPE LMAO.

The reason this is happening is because Jensen, in his infinite wisdom, decided to reduce NVL VR200 Memory usage.

It went from 21TB HBM4 + 55TB LPDDR5X to 21TB + 27.5GB LPDDR5X.

The AI spending/ Nvidia revenue itself hasn't changed, but rather Nvidia will ship more systems at lower prices and memory demand has decreased.

The decision was made partly because 55TB was overkill for most use cases but mostly because Jensen decided that gamers deserved to exist. Even though prices aren't that high below 5070 Ti, Gamers are complaining about RAM/SSD prices. And those complaining gamers are derailing his narrative.

If Jensen had for example increased it to 74TB LP5X, you'd be lucky to get an 8GB dGPU lmao.
 
Last edited:
Launches a new video card > releases totally poorly optimized games to justify the investment >>> games look the same with an inferior card... NVIDIA can no longer hide the "scam" 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡
 
Doubt they would release Super at this point, unless the DDR price comes down.

I'm going to ride my 5090 till I can, the reason I bought it was to brute force every damm unoptimised game for the next few years at 4K DLSS 4.5 Performance.
 
Last edited:

20% Less gaming revenue + Higher ASPs = Significantly lower shipment counts.

And this is compared with AMD that had 5-7% share LMAO.

Don't worry though, no one wants RDNA4 so it will remain abundantly available as the existing inventory isn't selling.
I suppose it'll be similar to RDNA3. Tbh I think RDNA has always been absolute trash compared the RTX but I would be happy to see people buy 9060s and 9070s simply because they are affordable.
 
Top Bottom