• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PR: Nintendo’s Win Confirmed in Patent Case against Mii Characters

Tripon

Member
REDMOND, Wash.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--On April 28, a federal appeals court confirmed that the patent asserted against Nintendo by RecogniCorp should never have been granted. The court’s order resolves a patent infringement lawsuit originally filed against Nintendo in 2011, in which RecogniCorp, LLC claimed that Nintendo’s Mii characters employed the same techniques described in the patent for making police sketches of suspects.


“We are very pleased with the court’s decision,” said Ajay Singh, Nintendo of America’s Director of Litigation and Compliance. “The decision marks another case in which Nintendo’s unique ideas overcame unjustified threats of patent infringement. Nintendo has a long history of developing innovative products and we will continue to vigorously defend all our products from meritless patent lawsuits.”

http://www.businesswire.com/news/ho...do’s-Win-Confirmed-Patent-Case-Mii-Characters
 

Moosichu

Member
Yep, always. Most companies settle, but Nintendo almost always takes them to court.

That's a good tactic actually, if your company has a reputation for going to court and consistently winning - then that is going to deter patent trolls from going after you.
 

Tripon

Member
That's a good tactic actually, if your company has a reputation for going to court and consistently winning - then that is going to deter patent trolls from going after you.

If anything, companies seem to try to go after Nintendo's pretty regularly. I guess they see all that wii money and think it should be theirs.
 

Doorman

Member
After reading this, is anyone else greatly amused by the notion of a police precinct somewhere releasing a Mii to the public as a composite for identification help?

"Do you recognize this man?!"
 
Holy crap these guys have sued a lot of people over this single patent

aaT2u4r.png
 

Daedardus

Member
Small summary I posted in another thread:

The only stuff you can find about that company is all the court documents pertaining to the lawsuit. Upon reading the appeal it seems that they tried to defend the particular way of encoding/decoding images using a composition of facial features. Court denied the patent based on the fact that encoding/decoding is omnipresent in the digital age and the fact they couldn't demonstrate why this particular method was inventive. Just a classic patent troll trying to make some easy money but getting blocked quite easily.
 
Holy crap these guys have sued a lot of people over this single patent

aaT2u4r.png

There are failed companies out there who's last resort is to sue every company who has a product that remotely resembles the concept of theirs. And filing lawsuits becomes their sole purpose of existence until they win one to get back on their feet. Its pathetic
 
Top Bottom