twilo99
Member
Yeah but windows is shit and will be slow as shit in a month if you do anything but gaming. If only gaming you at least get 6 months till it slows to a crawl.
You must be referring to Windows 95
Yeah but windows is shit and will be slow as shit in a month if you do anything but gaming. If only gaming you at least get 6 months till it slows to a crawl.
That is because of the utterly shit design that is Windows. The vision of a PC in every house means it should be as maintenance free as a fridge. Or a Mac.This sounds like my parents. They complain that their laptop is slowing down. I go and check and they have like 50 programs opening up during startup, none of them which they use.
I just updated to windows 11, my windows 10 was installed over 3 years ago and ran still fast without issues.
I spent 2.5k CAD for basically FPS and better resolution. Then I turn on HFW Burning Shores and ask myself why most games on PC don’t look this good.Absolutely not, there is nothing next gen about PC other than playing your current games in higher res and fps.
Its the ultimate platform for multi plats and highly customisable experience.
But the next gen isn't and never will be PC you cant push things forward when you have to develop for lowest common denominator or most popular cards.
People like me use my 7900xt PC as a beefy console. I couldn’t careless about whatever else it does.People be here treating PCs like they're only good for gaming.
You do know you can do more things, right? Like make money?
Exactly same boat bro and even the lower res stuff it’s still kind of fine for example Jedi Fallen Order sure runs at 1440p 60 but it looks great, good enough to enjoy without thinking “this looks very blurry or low res”.I spent 2.5k CAD for basically FPS and better resolution. Then I turn on HFW Burning Shores and ask myself why most games on PC don’t look this good.
Its not about power- its about the care the devs put into a game. Most games nowadays don’t feel that way and just feel rushed, especially on PC with the stuttering and instability of games these days.
People like me use my 7900xt PC as a beefy console. I couldn’t care less about whatever else it does.
Getting good price x performance on a GPU is not exactly hard right now. Very easily achieved with a AMD GPU, for quite cheap even. $370 will net you a GPU almost 30% faster then a PS5 with 12GB VRAM. If you are adamant for Nvidia, then yes, the $599 4070 is the only option worth considering, but that is 80% faster with way, way better RT and DLSS.I'M PC guy, but I'm pretty much done with PC gamer as it is today, I'm trying to upgrade my GPU with reasonable perf x cost but its very hard, the games are plagued with stutters, shader compilation and other BS. I bought a PS5, the graphics are at a level that I find very good, PS5 exclusives are very competitive with the best PC can offer and I'm playing everything at 60fps with competitive stuff at 120.
Yes PC is more powerful, and I do love PC gaming, but I think I had enough for a while, I'll just wait for a GPU launch that wasn't a ripoff and to the games to mature a bit more on DX12Ultimate. If anything, they need to get rid of F*ckin shader compilation issues. Until that happen, I'll primarily play games on the PS5 and keep my PC to lightweight gaming and emulation.
Well that was my experience, I don't like AMD GPU's, I want DLSS and good RT performance. For raster games I'm okay with the PS5.Getting good price x performance on a GPU is not exactly hard right now. Very easily achieved with a AMD GPU, for quite cheap even. $370 will net you a GPU almost 30% faster then a PS5 with 12GB VRAM. If you are adamant for Nvidia, then yes, the $599 4070 is the only option worth considering, but that is 80% faster with way, way better RT and DLSS.
As for stutter issues, they are widely overblown, of the most recent 20 multi-plarform games reviewed by Digital Foundry a grand total of 3 are worse on PC, with 2 of those being patched already. The other 17 (up to 19 now) are better on PC. Remarkably so in several cases such as Forspoken, Dead Space, RE4, Callisto Protocol, and Returnal.
Frankly, issues with PC gaming appear to be widely overblown, which is backed up by Steams continuous user growth.
Which version of Windows are we talking about?Yeah but windows is shit and will be slow as shit in a month if you do anything but gaming. If only gaming you at least get 6 months till it slows to a crawl.
Dude, update that celeron already, that hasn't happened to me in more than a decade and I haven't even had any high end CPU, just medium and even low-end (counting a 4C4T Ryzen CPU I had before this current 6C12T)... Or I probably don't click on all those "Check these horney milfs around your location" banners, idk...Yeah but windows is shit and will be slow as shit in a month if you do anything but gaming. If only gaming you at least get 6 months till it slows to a crawl.
In my parent's defense they don't speak english very well so half the time they have no idea what the PC is saying. And if they want to install some software they need and the software says "hey you also want this additional software and also this additional anti virus to be installed too?" they usually don't realize to uncheck those boxes.That is because of the utterly shit design that is Windows. The vision of a PC in every house means it should be as maintenance free as a fridge. Or a Mac.
Nothing more annoying than when nerds teehee that somebody’s PC is exploding in slow motion because the owner is not interested in tech and therefore hasn’t been manually updating registry entries every night and reinstalling their operating system on a regular basis.
A PC is supposed to be a tool for everyday use. Even cars need less babying than a windows PC ffs.
yeah and crysis launched on the wii.Absolutely not, there is nothing next gen about PC other than playing your current games in higher res and fps.
Its the ultimate platform for multi plats and highly customisable experience.
But the next gen isn't and never will be PC you cant push things forward when you have to develop for lowest common denominator or most popular cards.
When the PS3 launched in 2006, $600 was an intolerable price point. I can see it now with inflation, but that extra 100 bucks in value has to show up in the console. It can't just be a new version of the same thing for more money.The PS5 has shown that a launch price of $500 is more than tolerable, or even a bargain judging by sales. So I wouldn’t be surprised about $600 for the standard model next time. $700 might be too rich considering there is competition.
There is nothing next gen about PC other than playing your current games in higher res and fps.