• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

First Halo 3 Reviews

Status
Not open for further replies.
GhaleonEB said:
I'm going to wait for the unbiased reviews. I have already concluded, having not played the game, that it is over-rated and should score no more than the equivalent of an 8.5 on any scale. Any other score is moneyhattedbiased.

Yeah, people only like Halo cause Microsoft virtually forces it upon us with all the manufactured hype and marketing
halolex9.gif
 
So who's going to make the "Bad things about Halo 3- Fans Beware!" thread on Tuesday?

Cause I heard that the Spiker Grenade is REAL cheap!
 
Mojovonio said:
So who's going to make the "Bad things about Halo 3- Fans Beware!" thread on Tuesday?

Cause I heard that the Spiker Grenade is REAL cheap!


The Spiker grenade is only cheap indoors. Its blast radius is a lot smaller than the regular grenades. I would make that thread, but I will be too busy playing Halo 3 to care about GAF at that time.
 
Opus Angelorum said:
How does that score relate to your magazine in general?

HALO was given a ten, HALO 2 got 9.5 / 10 (we had two reviews). So it's quite good, but there's a bad a tendency here in Central-Europe: our ratings are higher than the average score globally.
 
Y2Kev said:
I give Halo 3 a 2/5.

The first level is really annoying. Who decided to make the first level based in an outerspace petting zoo? Really.
we should listen to you why????????
 
Dirtbag 504 said:
:lol

I'm more curious about his lair review.

I think LAIR is shit :lol

Relax, I was mocking the shitty review above mischaracterizing Halo's first level.

edit: What's wrong with my HS review? I didn't even score it, so you can't call me fat!
 
We all know it's going to get nothing but 9's and 10's from the usual suspects, i'm more curious how people will rate the game a few months after the fact (see: Halo 2).
 
Either halo 3 gets uniformly good reviews or uniformly bad reviews or else the forum would be unreadable for a few month.
 
Proelite said:
Either halo 3 gets uniformly good reviews or uniformly bad reviews or else the forum would be unreadable for a few month.


Then be prepared to pick up a book. I'm sure someone, somewhere will come up with a low score (or what would be considered low around here) for H3.
 
Hitler Stole My Potato said:
Then be prepared to pick up a book. I'm sure someone, somewhere will come up with a low score (or what would be considered low around here) for H3.

I'm expecting an 8.9 from Gamespot, I don't think it will receive anything lower (in the regarded review circle).
 
Hitler Stole My Potato said:
Then be prepared to pick up a book. I'm sure someone, somewhere will come up with a low score (or what would be considered low around here) for H3.

The question is whether or not it'll be deserved. Shoe/1Up's going to give it a 10 no matter what, that's not in question.
 
Opus Angelorum said:
I'm expecting an 8.9 from Gamespot, I don't think it will receive anything lower (in the regarded review circle).

Their reviews go up in .5's now so it'll be 8.5 or 9.0 (you choose:D )

I know they're giving it 9.5
 
Stinkles said:
There are no autoturrets, invisibility or invincibility on the first level. None.
Excuse me, but please do show me where I claim that those are to be found on the first level? BUt that sort of confirmas that those ARE in te game.
 
_leech_ said:
The question is whether or not it'll be deserved. Shoe/1Up's going to give it a 10 no matter what, that's not in question.

It's kinda disappointing when you know for a fact that a site's gonna give it a 10. It's just.. (need a word)

I'm not saying it won't be worthy of a 10, but when you know certain sites are giving it out before you read it if you get me.
 
Dr.zs said:
Excuse me, but please do show me where I claim that those are to be found on the first level? BUt that sort of confirmas that those ARE in te game.


You should read your own posts, then stop drinking.
 
Dr.zs said:
Excuse me, but please do show me where I claim that those are to be found on the first level? BUt that sort of confirmas that those ARE in te game.

Dr.zs said:
The first level is pretty straight forward A-B stuff, nothing really surprising. The only new idea in the first level is the implementation of various things you do with the x-button. The bubble shiled we know, but you have auto-turrets, invisble cloaking device, invicebility and so on.

Even if I read that incorrectly, it would still say the same thing.
 
FF_VIII said:
It's kinda disappointing when you know for a fact that a site's gonna give it a 10. It's just.. (need a word)

I'm not saying it won't be worthy of a 10, but when you know certain sites are giving it out before you read it if you get me.
It's the same for other places like Gamespot, which, arguably, rates games lower to get hits on their site, according to GAF. I'm not saying whether they do or not. But I know there are some review sites/magazines that will rate Halo 3 lower than everything else to get some controversy.
 
derder said:
Are any of these reviews going to actually change if you're going to buy it or not?

Not for me. The main problems I had with Halo 1 and 2 was the horrible level design and repetitive combat. If Halo 3 is more of the same then it doesn't matter to me what reviewers score it because, like i've said, it's going to get 9's and 10's from everyone anyways. I'm hoping desperately that Bungie's fixed these issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom